Bug#256374: Installation hangs on Compaq Presario 1220 while loading module 'ide-cd' during hardware detection for the CD-ROM drive (beta4, i386, linux26)

2004-07-01 Thread Robin Blondon
Per Olofsson wrote: On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 21:22 -0300, Robin Blondon wrote: If I choose to detect network hardware a second time without restarting cardmgr it still fails to find the card. I need to either restart cardmgr or reinsert the card. I think that this problem is specific to be

Bug#257215: kernel-image-2.6.6-2-686: BANDRIDGE USB to Serial adapter - kernel oops

2004-07-01 Thread Chris Higgins
Package: kernel-image-2.6.6-2-686 Version: 2.6.6-2 Severity: normal PL2303 USB module oops on unload usbcore: deregistering driver pl2303 drivers/usb/serial/usb-serial.c: USB Serial deregistering driver PL-2303 PL-2303 ttyUSB0: PL-2303 converter now disconnected from ttyUSB0 usbserial 1-1:1.0: de

Bug#256374: Installation hangs on Compaq Presario 1220 while loading module 'ide-cd' during hardware detection for the CD-ROM drive (beta4, i386, linux26)

2004-07-01 Thread Per Olofsson
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 21:22 -0300, Robin Blondon wrote: > If I choose to detect network hardware a second time without restarting > cardmgr it still fails to find the card. I need to either restart > cardmgr or reinsert the card. I think that this problem is specific to beta4. Could you try a

Processed: Re: Bug#256374: Installation hangs on Compaq Presario 1220 while loading module 'ide-cd' during hardware detection for the CD-ROM drive (beta4, i386, linux26)

2004-07-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 256374 kernel Bug#256374: Installation hangs on Compaq Presario 1220 while loading module 'ide-cd' during hardware detection for the CD-ROM drive (beta4, i386, linux26) Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `kernel'. > retitle

Bug#257129: kernel-image-2.4.26: Does not mount filesystems specified by label

2004-07-01 Thread Michelle Konzack
Am 2004-07-01 13:32:24, schrieb Michal Suchanek: >Package: kernel-image-2.4.26-1-686 >Version: 2.4.26-2 >Severity: normal >File: kernel-image-2.4.26 > >When the kernel boots something says it cannot check root because it is >not mounted ro, then it continues with errors like >"No such device: LABEL

Bug#257038: kernel-image-2.6.6-1-686: Does not mount HFS+ volume

2004-07-01 Thread Sven Luther
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 02:01:24PM +0200, Michal 'hramrach' Suchanek wrote: > On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 07:07:59AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 07:47:12PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote: > > > Package: kernel-image-2.6.6-1-686 > > > > > > 192:~# mount -t hfsplus /dev/hdc5 /mnt

Bug#257120: kernel-source-2.4.26: Kernel panic with NFS traffic over IPsec

2004-07-01 Thread Cristian Mezzetti
Hi, Matthias Urlichs wrote: > The actual panic message would be helpful. I've previously hand-dumped the console message, I don't know what's the better way to do this type of work (kernel debug options, tools, etc..). At this moment I don't have access to the kernel .config options of the mac

Re: kernel-patch-usagi

2004-07-01 Thread Sven Luther
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 07:32:13PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > I intent to adopt the kernel-patch-usagi package. > > I think I will atleast need to split it up in 2 packages, one for > 2.4 and one for 2.6. So I'd get kernel-patch-usagi-2.4 and and > kernel-patch-usagi-2.6. > > Or should I make a

Re: kernel-patch-usagi

2004-07-01 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 07:32:13PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > I intent to adopt the kernel-patch-usagi package. > > I think I will atleast need to split it up in 2 packages, one for > 2.4 and one for 2.6. So I'd get kernel-patch-usagi-2.4 and and > kernel-patch-usagi-2.6. > > Or should I make a

Bug#257093: marked as done (kernel-image-2.6.6-2-686: kernel will not load file system)

2004-07-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 1 Jul 2004 19:57:39 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line kernel-image-2.6.6-2-686: kernel will not load file system has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

initrd-tools_0.1.71_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2004-07-01 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: initrd-tools_0.1.71.dsc to pool/main/i/initrd-tools/initrd-tools_0.1.71.dsc initrd-tools_0.1.71.tar.gz to pool/main/i/initrd-tools/initrd-tools_0.1.71.tar.gz initrd-tools_0.1.71_all.deb to pool/main/i/initrd-tools/initrd-tools_0.1.71_all.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists

kernel-patch-usagi

2004-07-01 Thread Kurt Roeckx
I intent to adopt the kernel-patch-usagi package. I think I will atleast need to split it up in 2 packages, one for 2.4 and one for 2.6. So I'd get kernel-patch-usagi-2.4 and and kernel-patch-usagi-2.6. Or should I make a version for each kernel source package in debian and then name them for in

Bug#257093: kernel-image-2.6.6-2-686: kernel will not load file system

2004-07-01 Thread Jason Dorje Short
Andreas Metzler wrote: The version of module-init-tools you are running currently has this bug fixed, but you might still have the old broken version on the initrd which is generated at installation of the kernel-image package. Could you try to regenerate initrd either by running mkinitrd -o /boot/

Processing of initrd-tools_0.1.71_i386.changes

2004-07-01 Thread Archive Administrator
initrd-tools_0.1.71_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: initrd-tools_0.1.71.dsc initrd-tools_0.1.71.tar.gz initrd-tools_0.1.71_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon

Bug#257093: kernel-image-2.6.6-2-686: kernel will not load file system

2004-07-01 Thread Jason Dorje Short
Andreas Metzler wrote: Is this is a new error or have you experienced it for some time now and just could not spatre the time to report the bug until now? I am asking because this sounds like another instance of http://bugs.debian.org/254950 "module-init-tools complains about read only filesystem a

Bug#252466: marked as done (initrd-tools: mkinitrd fails to add via82cxxx module on powerpc/pegasos, and thus there is no ide driver loaded.)

2004-07-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 01 Jul 2004 11:32:06 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#252466: fixed in initrd-tools 0.1.71 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#252464: marked as done (initrd-tools: ext2 module is missing when MODULE=dep on powerpc/pegasos, and running an ext2 root.)

2004-07-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 01 Jul 2004 11:32:06 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#252464: fixed in initrd-tools 0.1.71 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] Re: [patch, 2.6, ppc] some modular framebuffer support

2004-07-01 Thread David Eger
compiling radeonfb as a module works just fine for me in 2.6... I don't see why you need a patch... > linux-fbdev folk, what is your take on this, would it be possible to > somehow get a way to have earlier debug messages, or to bring the > loading of fbdev modules to an earlier point ? If yo

Bug#249564: mkinitrd should not fail when modules are missing

2004-07-01 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-28 20:14]: > > Mkinitrd does not load the qla2300 module (QLogic FC adapter) from a > > separate module package. > > Does this patch help? Torsten, can you confirm that this patch fixed the problem? -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: pending

2004-07-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 252466 + pending Bug#252466: initrd-tools: mkinitrd fails to add via82cxxx module on powerpc/pegasos, and thus there is no ide driver loaded. There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > tags 252464 + pending Bug#252464: initrd-tools: ext2 modul

Re: Open a discussion about bug 253324

2004-07-01 Thread Thibaut VARENE
--- > Hi, > > > I'd like to know how a modularized PCI subsystem can be loaded _AFTER_ > > a PCI dependent FB driver. > > Well, duh, obviously you can't do that. :-/ Heh, I has a feeling that wouldn't be that easy ;) > > What then if the PCI buswalk kills the kernel? > > You w

Bug#252464: please comment

2004-07-01 Thread Sven Luther
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 10:05:11AM -0400, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-01 10:55]: > > Now a question about these patches. Will you mae a new release, or > > should i, as part of the new debian-kernel team make the upload with > > them ? > > I intend to make

Re: Open a discussion about bug 253324

2004-07-01 Thread Sven Luther
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 03:50:28PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote: > Hi, > > > I'd like to know how a modularized PCI subsystem can be loaded _AFTER_ > > a PCI dependent FB driver. > > Well, duh, obviously you can't do that. :-/ > > > What then if the PCI buswalk kills the kernel? > > You write

Bug#252464: please comment

2004-07-01 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-01 10:55]: > Now a question about these patches. Will you mae a new release, or > should i, as part of the new debian-kernel team make the upload with > them ? I intend to make an upload, but if you want to, just go ahead; check them into SVN though. --

cobalt kernel patch for 2.6.x

2004-07-01 Thread Russell Coker
http://www.no-l.org/pages/cobalt-patch.html At the above URL there is a patch against the Debian 2.6.6 kernel to support Cobalt hardware. I have also uploaded a kernel patch package to Debian with it. It seems to work OK, and it would be good if we could get it included upstream... -- http:

Re: Bug#256374: Installation hangs on Compaq Presario 1220 while loading module 'ide-cd' during hardware detection for the CD-ROM drive (beta4, i386, linux26)

2004-07-01 Thread Martin Michlmayr
reassign 256374 kernel retitle 256374 CD problems under 2.6, not under 2.4 thanks * Robin Blondon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-01 10:29]: > I finally got 2.4 to install (with a few PCMCIA/networking snags) and > was able to upgrade to the kernel package kernel-image-2.6.6-1-386. > After rebootin

Re: kernel-patch-amd64

2004-07-01 Thread Sven Luther
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 03:33:06PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote: > Hi, Sven Luther wrote: > > > And sorry, upto now, your only arguments where dogma, white space and the > > monolitic nature of the patch. > > If you s/dogma/experience with handling kernel patches/, all three points > are entirel

Re: Open a discussion about bug 253324

2004-07-01 Thread Thibaut VARENE
--- > Hi, Sven Luther wrote: > > > This is bullshit. I don't think it is a great idea to modularize the > > kernel, and thus lose all the early debugging. We are going to hurt us if > > we go that way, especially as the boot process is now more fragile as it > > used to be, thanks

Re: Open a discussion about bug 253324

2004-07-01 Thread Matthias Urlichs
Hi, > I'd like to know how a modularized PCI subsystem can be loaded _AFTER_ > a PCI dependent FB driver. Well, duh, obviously you can't do that. :-/ > What then if the PCI buswalk kills the kernel? You write these parts of the kernel defensively so that this doesn't happen, and/or you test it

Re: kernel-patch-amd64

2004-07-01 Thread Matthias Urlichs
Hi, Sven Luther wrote: > And sorry, upto now, your only arguments where dogma, white space and the > monolitic nature of the patch. If you s/dogma/experience with handling kernel patches/, all three points are entirely valid reasons to reject a patch. (NB: you want "were".) Split the thing now.

Re: Open a discussion about bug 253324

2004-07-01 Thread Sven Luther
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 03:18:47PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote: > Hi, Sven Luther wrote: > > > This is bullshit. I don't think it is a great idea to modularize the > > kernel, and thus lose all the early debugging. We are going to hurt us if > > we go that way, especially as the boot process is

Re: Open a discussion about bug 253324

2004-07-01 Thread Matthias Urlichs
Hi, Sven Luther wrote: > This is bullshit. I don't think it is a great idea to modularize the > kernel, and thus lose all the early debugging. We are going to hurt us if > we go that way, especially as the boot process is now more fragile as it > used to be, thanks to the initrd thingy, The worka

Bug#257038: kernel-image-2.6.6-1-686: Does not mount HFS+ volume

2004-07-01 Thread Michal 'hramrach' Suchanek
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 07:07:59AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 07:47:12PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote: > > Package: kernel-image-2.6.6-1-686 > > > > 192:~# mount -t hfsplus /dev/hdc5 /mnt > > mount: Not a directory > > > > the same thing with mount /dev/hdc /mnt > > > >

Bug#257129: kernel-image-2.4.26: Does not mount filesystems specified by label

2004-07-01 Thread Michal Suchanek
Package: kernel-image-2.4.26-1-686 Version: 2.4.26-2 Severity: normal File: kernel-image-2.4.26 When the kernel boots something says it cannot check root because it is not mounted ro, then it continues with errors like "No such device: LABEL=Home" while mounting other partitions. When I boot with

Bug#257120: kernel-source-2.4.26: Kernel panic with NFS traffic over IPsec

2004-07-01 Thread Cristian Mezzetti
Package: kernel-source-2.4.26 Version: 2.4.26-2 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system The IPsec backport have some issues with NFS. Using an NFS export over an IPsec channel causes an immediate kernel panic. Scenario: - 2 hosts, debian kernel 2.4.26, one NFS server, one NFS c

VESA-FB in the kernel (built-in, not module, was: Open a discussion about bug 253324)

2004-07-01 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include * Andrew Pollock [Wed, Jun 30 2004, 09:17:59AM]: > Ah yes. Herbert had quite strong views on what should and shouldn't be done > in the kernel, despite the fact that things existed in the kernel here and > now, and to implement the equivalent in userspace would require someone to > actua

Bug#255390: module-init-tools /etc/modprobe.conf no longer exists

2004-07-01 Thread Agustin Martin
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 08:12:20PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Jun 30, Agustin Martin wrote: > > > By the way, mkinitrd complained about /etc/modprobe.conf and the one at lib > > dir not being present because of the recent changes in module-init-tools. > > The image built and seems to work, bu

Re: [patch, 2.6, ppc] some modular framebuffer support

2004-07-01 Thread Sven Luther
Let's bring linux-fbdev in the loop, as they probably are the best placed to comment. On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 10:26:18AM +0200, Jens Schmalzing wrote: > Hi, > > the following patch allows some accelerated framebuffers (aty128fb, > atyfb, radeonfb, and rivafb) and framebuffer console support itsel

Re: Open a discussion about bug 253324

2004-07-01 Thread Sven Luther
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 09:54:48AM +0200, Jens Schmalzing wrote: > Hi, > > Bluefuture writes: > > > > The low techie people I came across think that anything beside > > > graphics are "old computing" or recovery broken things... so a > > > bootsplash help they to trust the operating system (the c

Re: Open a discussion about bug 253324

2004-07-01 Thread Marco Amadori
Alle 09:54, giovedì 01 luglio 2004, Jens Schmalzing ha scritto: > Psychology aside, there are two technical reasons for not integrating > this kernel patch. > > One: It works exclusively with vesafb and this sucks. But let's > assume for the moment that we all have nothing but i386 hardware and >

Bug#252464: please comment

2004-07-01 Thread Sven Luther
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 06:15:11PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 03:12:30PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > > > Yep, that worked for ext2. > > Still via82cxxx is missing though, which means no ide driver on > > powerpc/pegasos, > > but this is another bug : > > > > http://

Bug#257093: kernel-image-2.6.6-2-686: kernel will not load file system

2004-07-01 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2004-07-01 Jason Dorje Short <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: kernel-image-2.6.6-2-686 > Version: 2.6.6-2 > Severity: important > When I boot up in this kernel I can not succeed. The eventual problem > is that none of the modules can be loaded because of a "read-only file > system". [.

Bug#252464: please comment

2004-07-01 Thread Herbert Xu
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 03:12:30PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > Yep, that worked for ext2. > Still via82cxxx is missing though, which means no ide driver on > powerpc/pegasos, > but this is another bug : > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=252466 Well this is because you'v

Re: Open a discussion about bug 253324

2004-07-01 Thread Jens Schmalzing
Hi, Bluefuture writes: > > The low techie people I came across think that anything beside > > graphics are "old computing" or recovery broken things... so a > > bootsplash help they to trust the operating system (the computer > > as whole object from their point of view). > > I'm totally agree o

Re: status of 2.6.7 ?

2004-07-01 Thread Jens Schmalzing
Hi, Thiemo Seufer writes: > Everything not needed for boot should already be in modules anyway. It's not that simple. There are lots of drivers in the vanilla kernel that nobody bothered to modularize, plain and simple. Herbert has done a tremenduous amount of this work already, but much remai

Bug#257038: kernel-image-2.6.6-1-686: Does not mount HFS+ volume

2004-07-01 Thread Sven Luther
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 07:47:12PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote: > Package: kernel-image-2.6.6-1-686 > Version: 2.6.6-1 > Severity: normal > > 192:~# mount -t hfsplus /dev/hdc5 /mnt > mount: Not a directory > > the same thing with mount /dev/hdc /mnt > > I can mount /dev/hdc5 /mnt but it is moun

Bug#257093: kernel-image-2.6.6-2-686: kernel will not load file system

2004-07-01 Thread Jason Dorje Short
Package: kernel-image-2.6.6-2-686 Version: 2.6.6-2 Severity: important When I boot up in this kernel I can not succeed. The eventual problem is that none of the modules can be loaded because of a "read-only file system". But why can't a read-only kernel module be loaded? I'd give a better rep

Re: 2.6.7

2004-07-01 Thread Sven Luther
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 10:19:20AM +0900, Horms wrote: > On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 04:01:16PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > [snip] > > > We really need to get 2.6.7 out in the open. How long has it been > > already, two weeks or three maybe ? > > > > Anyway, i am CCing ftpmasters, in hope to get s