I've confirmed that setting CONFIG_PDC202XX_FORCE=y resolves the
problem.
Package: kernel
Version: N/A; reported 2004-07-27
Severity: serious
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: ia64
Kernel: Linux ovtaia4 2.4.17-mckinley-smp #1 SMP Tue May 14 21:57:05 MDT
2002 ia64
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
I found a problem when running a RPC program built on a
Hi Stuart,
On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 10:45:11PM +0200, Stuart Pook wrote:
> > With a 2.6.8-rc2-bk9 kernel things work fine right now, no CRC
> > errors so far.
>
> This is very interesting as I would really like to be able to use my
> PDC20262. What made you try the 2.6.8-rc2-bk9 kernel? I have h
Ingo Juergensmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Package: binutils
> Version: 2.15-1
> Severity: serious
>
> After updating binutils to 2.15-1, building a new kernel results in an
> error:
>
> CC arch/ppc/kernel/ppc_htab.o
> AS arch/ppc/kernel/l2cr.o
> arch/ppc/kernel/l2cr.S: Assemble
Package: binutils
Version: 2.15-1
Severity: serious
After updating binutils to 2.15-1, building a new kernel results in an
error:
CC arch/ppc/kernel/ppc_htab.o
AS arch/ppc/kernel/l2cr.o
arch/ppc/kernel/l2cr.S: Assembler messages:
arch/ppc/kernel/l2cr.S:110: Error: Unrecognized opcod
On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 10:45:11PM +0200, Stuart Pook wrote:
> Could you also attach the config (.config) file that you used to compile
> the kernel?
Attached is my kernel config. Since I don't know what exactly fixed the
problem, I will also give a complete list of patches that were applied
to my
Subject: kernel-image-2.6.7-powerpc: Early G4 Xserve does not init ide
Package: kernel-image-2.6.7-powerpc
Version: 2.6.7-4
Severity: important
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (600, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: powerpc (p
What is discussed here, should not this apply to kernel 2.4.27 wich is soon
out the door as well, also has had a looong test run, yes know it`s summer,
but 2.6 and 2.4- what`s comming seems like better than 2.4.26 and 2.6.7, and
yes one can always go on and say the next will be better d`oh, but
What is discussed here, should not this apply to kernel 2.4.27 wich is soon
out the door as well, also has had a looong test run, yes know it`s summer,
but 2.6 and 2.4- what`s comming seems like better than 2.4.26 and 2.6.7, and
yes one can always go on and say the next will be better d`oh, but
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 10:28:55AM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> I hope very soon; I have OOM killer fixes (purely functional issues,
>> i.e. refcounting mm's) waiting for 2.4.28-pre1.
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 08:37:40PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> anything more precise than soon ? We need
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 10:28:55AM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 05:20:09PM +, Thomas Skybakmoen wrote:
> >> Here goes the forth 2.4.27 release candidate.
> >> It includes a dozen of USB fixes, JFS update, IA64 fixes,
> >> networking update, amongst others.
> >>
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 05:20:09PM +, Thomas Skybakmoen wrote:
>> Here goes the forth 2.4.27 release candidate.
>> It includes a dozen of USB fixes, JFS update, IA64 fixes,
>> networking update, amongst others.
>> 2.4.27 final should be out soon.
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 07:29:34PM +0200, Sven
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 05:20:09PM +, Thomas Skybakmoen wrote:
> What is discussed here, should not this apply to kernel 2.4.27 wich is soon
Well, i (and probably the rest of the debian-kernel team) care only little
about 2.4 kernels, but sure you have a point.
> out the door as well, also h
close 262390
thanks
Hi,
Troy Benjegerdes writes:
> This can be closed.
Okay, thanks.
> > Does the iPod work when you load the modules manually?
>
> If I load sbp2 manually, its fine FYI, when you plug firewire
> disks in, and sbp2 loads, how do you tell sbp2 to 'log out' of a
> firewire d
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 262390
Bug#262390: kernel-image-2.6.7-powerpc: firewire broken (sbp2 module does not
see ipod)
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Troy Benjegerdes <[EMAIL
PROTECT
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 10:52:44AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Aug 2004 09:09:56 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> >
> > With proper cooperation from the ftp-masters, this could happen much
> > faster. I
> > have asked in the past that the kernel packages get the same favorite
> > trea
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 09:32:44AM +0200, Jens Schmalzing wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Troy Benjegerdes writes:
>
> > kernel-image 2.6.7-4 seems to fix the problem with the ipod.
>
> Does this mean the bug can be closed? Or downgraded?
This can be closed.
>
> > However, hotplug finds and loads sbp2 when
On Mon, 02 Aug 2004 09:09:56 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> With proper cooperation from the ftp-masters, this could happen much faster. I
> have asked in the past that the kernel packages get the same favorite
> treatment as the d-i packages, but nobody ever bothered to react on this.
>
This is
Hello all,
Would it be possible that the OSD for AV7110 multimedia dvb card can be set to ON by default in the kernel options.
This
option is under device driver, multimedia devices, digital video broadcasting
devices, AV7110 OSD support
This
would be useful as the DVB users (using vd
On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 11:13:23AM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 31, 2004 at 06:02:19PM +0200, Jens Schmalzing wrote:
> > Package: kernel-source-2.4.26
> > Version: 2.4.26-4
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Subject says it all. The apply and unapply scripts doesn't work at
> > all.
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 02:40:57AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 11:16:34AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > Planning to violate the release schedule is not encouraged.
>
> > No, but let's be realist. The woody release schedule was also announced in a
> > hurry (of the no i
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 11:16:34AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Planning to violate the release schedule is not encouraged.
> No, but let's be realist. The woody release schedule was also announced in a
> hurry (of the no info for month, and then we freeze tomorrow), and then we
> waited almost t
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 01:57:50AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 09:09:56AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > After chatting w/ some of the -boot people on IRC, I'm unconvinced that 2
> > > weeks is enough time. We're talking about 4 and a half weeks total before
> > > the p
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 09:09:56AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > After chatting w/ some of the -boot people on IRC, I'm unconvinced that 2
> > weeks is enough time. We're talking about 4 and a half weeks total before
> > the packages enter testing, and that's assuming
> > a) 2.6.8 release happens
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 09:55:02AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 08:54:08AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > the revision or the version is about the same amount of work to get it
> > > being used. So no gain there.
> >
> > And its too late for d-i anyway, was probably
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 08:54:08AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > the revision or the version is about the same amount of work to get it
> > being used. So no gain there.
>
> And its too late for d-i anyway, was probably already last week. Even my
> 2.6.7-4 .udeb kernels didn't make it in.
Well,
Hi,
Troy Benjegerdes writes:
> kernel-image 2.6.7-4 seems to fix the problem with the ipod.
Does this mean the bug can be closed? Or downgraded?
> However, hotplug finds and loads sbp2 when I have the ipod plugged in at
> boot, but not when I plug it in after booting. Is this a hotplug issue?
On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 09:07:09PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> I'm very interested in moving ia64 to 2.6.8, since that kernel should
> work out of the box on SGI's boxes. Normally I start a build as soon as a
> kernel-source and an upstream patch is available; however, there's
> a new ia64 2.6 ma
Hi,
Horms writes:
> Thanks, I have you resolved this or do you want me to look into it?
Please take care of this. I haven't looked at the patches at all,
just worked around the bug locally by disabling the scripts
altogether.
Regards, Jens.
--
J'qbpbe, le m'en fquz pe j'qbpbe!
Le veux aimeb
On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 09:28:46PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Jul 2004 13:52:17 +0200, Jens Schmalzing wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Andres Salomon writes:
> >
> >> There has been some talk on IRC about what kernel to release sarge
> >> with; some people would prefer 2.6.8 (which hasn'
Hi folks,
I've got a problem with loadmodules on the initrd:
AFAICS mkinitrd searches /etc/fstab for the root and the
swap partition. Then it uses the /dev entry for swap (?) to
get a major device number. This number is then mapped to
hardware, i.e. "SCSI" for my SATA controller. Finally it
searche
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 01:51:20AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 04:57:40AM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> >> At some point in the past, I wrote:
> >> >> The 2.6.8 release has been almost exclusively focused on sta
On Sun, 01 Aug 2004 21:54:27 -0700, Stephen Zander wrote:
> While I appreciate the thought, if you're going to add functionality to
> the standard kernel, please don't butcher it just because you feel like
> it.
There's nothing stopping us from removing Herbert's incomplete DM patch
and applying
Is there anything further I can do to help resolve this issue? For now, I
am working around the problem by backing out to an older cdrecord which
doesn't trigger the problem, but I would like to help solve it correctly.
Has anyone else seen this behaviour?
--
- mdz
Package: kernel-source-2.4.26
Version: 2.4.26-4
Severity: important
When the device-mapper patch was edded into the standard debian patch
list for 2.4.26, it was incompletely installed.. This results in other
packages, e.g. kernel-patch-evms, that extend or rely on the
device-mapper patch to f
35 matches
Mail list logo
