Not really. That licence doesn't allow Debian to distribute whatever
it is that's being licenced. There's only permission for personal use.
Hmm. My initial reading was that you could
(1) create, test and provide programs for use with ALTEON network cards
(2) license the object code of such a
Package: kernel-image-2.6.9-1-686
Version: 2.6.9-3
Severity: important
Tags: experimental
I recompiled the original 2.6.9 kernel with the patches from
http://www.stanford.edu/~sanjiv/thinkpad/thinkpad.html. ACPI of my
laptop works well.
J Zou
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 18:47:37 +0100, Juan Cespedes [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 12:11:47PM +0900, Horms wrote:
reassign 284116 kernel-package
Package kernel-package already has an option to include vmlinux in
the images (install_vmlinux, which fixed Bug#243927), so I still
Hi,
Here is more information about the problems I mentioned in last bug
report. I have tried Linux kernel-image-2.6.8-1-686 and
kernel-image-2.4.27-1-686 from sarge on my IBM Thinkpad T41. However
1) my laptop can not power off or standby after I type shutdown -h now.
It hangs before completlely
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 285168 kernel
Bug#285168: Regression for Revoltec USB 2 CD burner 2.6.7 - 2.6.9
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-package' to `kernel'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 08:03:15AM -0800, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Being able to inspect the kernel variables and the kernel content
with:
gdb /boot/vmlinux /proc/kcore
I disagree. People who want the bare vmlinux can use the
configuration option install_vmlinux to get the
reassign 285168 kernel
thanks
Hi,
On Sat, 11 Dec 2004 00:00:18 -0500, Ian Gulliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Package: kernel-package Version: 8.115 Severity: normal
My Revoltec CD burner breaks from 2.6.7 - 2.6.9. This is an
external CD/DVD burner labeled Mad Dog Multimedia Dominator USB
Rejected: Rejected: kernel-image-power3-smp_2.6.9-2_powerpc.deb: old version
(100) in unstable = new version (2.6.9-2) targeted at unstable.
Rejected: Rejected: kernel-patch-powerpc-2.6.9_2.6.9-2_all.deb: old version
(2.6.9-3) in unstable = new version (2.6.9-2) targeted at unstable.
Rejected:
Package: kernel-patch-debian-2.6.9
Version: 2.6.9-3
Severity: normal
Hi,
The smbfs patches introduced in 2.6.9-3 cause the following funny
phenomenon: I can create and erase files, but not write to them.
More specifically, if I do echo xxx yyy in an smbfs filesystem, it
blocks, and after
Package: kernel-patch-debian-2.6.9
Version: 2.6.9-3
Followup-For: Bug #282234
Long version:
The modular-vesafb patch makes the line
module_init(vesafb_init);
which was unconditional, conditional upon compilation as a module.
As this is the only reference to vesafb_init, which registers the
kernel-image-2.6.9-amd64_2.6.9-4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kernel-image-2.6.9-amd64_2.6.9-4.dsc
kernel-image-2.6.9-amd64_2.6.9-4.tar.gz
kernel-headers-2.6.9-9_2.6.9-4_i386.deb
kernel-headers-2.6.9-9-em64t-p4-smp_2.6.9-4_i386.deb
kernel-latest-2.6-amd64_100_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kernel-latest-2.6-amd64_100.dsc
kernel-latest-2.6-amd64_100.tar.gz
kernel-headers-2.6-amd64-generic_100_i386.deb
kernel-image-2.6-amd64-generic_100_i386.deb
kernel-headers-2.6-amd64-generic_100_i386.deb
to
pool/main/k/kernel-latest-2.6-amd64/kernel-headers-2.6-amd64-generic_100_i386.deb
kernel-headers-2.6-amd64-k8-smp_100_i386.deb
to
pool/main/k/kernel-latest-2.6-amd64/kernel-headers-2.6-amd64-k8-smp_100_i386.deb
(new) kernel-headers-2.6.9-9-amd64-generic_2.6.9-4_i386.deb optional devel
Linux kernel headers 2.6.9 for generic x86_64 systems
This package provides kernel header files for version 2.6.9 on all x86_64
systems, for sites that want the latest kernel headers. Please read
On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 12:59:24AM +0100, Tomasz Malesinski wrote:
Why hasn't the bug #266882 (CAN-2004-0554 i387.h in kernel: asm
volatile(fnclex ; fwait);) has not been fixed in 2.4.18 for so long?
That and a host of others. Security-Team, Is there ever going to be a
new kernel for Woody?
kernel-image-2.6.8-amd64_2.6.8-8_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kernel-image-2.6.8-amd64_2.6.8-8.dsc
kernel-image-2.6.8-amd64_2.6.8-8.tar.gz
kernel-headers-2.6.8-9_2.6.8-8_i386.deb
kernel-headers-2.6.8-9-amd64-generic_2.6.8-8_i386.deb
Accepted:
kernel-headers-2.6.8-9-amd64-generic_2.6.8-8_i386.deb
to
pool/main/k/kernel-image-2.6.8-amd64/kernel-headers-2.6.8-9-amd64-generic_2.6.8-8_i386.deb
kernel-headers-2.6.8-9-amd64-k8-smp_2.6.8-8_i386.deb
to
On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 09:46:56PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 05:20:08PM +0100, Thomas Hood wrote:
The original report (#284356) was submitted by Joey Hess and made no
reference to proprietary modules. This affects modules shipped by
Debian too.
The problem is that
18 matches
Mail list logo
