Hello,
I built backported versions of udev and kernel-package which would allow to
build and use linux-2.6 2.6.12 inside sarge. This should allow to install
linux-2.6 2.6.12-6 from sid directly even, i believe, without need to rebuild.
I am currently building powerpc kernel packages, and will upl
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 08:54:09AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> Now that linux 2.6.12-6 is ready to enter testing, (just waiting an RM
> override for the hppa flavour rename)
I don't see any reason here for the release team to override the
out-of-date hppa packages. Removing them is an ftp team t
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 02:32:34AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I don't see any reason here for the release team to override the
> out-of-date hppa packages. Removing them is an ftp team task, not a
> release team task.
Why are they listed as out-of-date? There is no version in testing.
Bastia
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 05:19:07PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 07:43:31AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Not a good idea. Why clutter the namespace of versions in order to adapt to
> > non-debian needs. ? What is it you intent to do anyway ?
>
> My intent is to be able
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 07:43:31AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> Not a good idea. Why clutter the namespace of versions in order to adapt to
> non-debian needs. ? What is it you intent to do anyway ?
My intent is to be able to tell the "branch" of the kernel based on
`uname -r` (per subject). So if
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 05:33:29PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> Sure, i am not stupid, i perfectly noticed that, now my question is why do you
> want to know that ?
That's for the klive project, I added two links in the first email just
check it again.
> Sure, it is a debian system, running a debi
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 Horms wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 04:50:03PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > This breaks the accounting format, so it's a change that needs a lot
> > of thought.
>
> I agree, though it is curious that it is enabled on alpha and hppa.
> Does that imply that it works wit
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 05:57:12PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 05:33:29PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Sure, i am not stupid, i perfectly noticed that, now my question is why do
> > you
> > want to know that ?
>
> That's for the klive project, I added two links in th
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 05:57:12PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 05:33:29PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Sure, i am not stupid, i perfectly noticed that, now my question is why do
> > you
> > want to know that ?
>
> That's for the klive project, I added two links in th
Hello,
I have made available backport packages of the linux-2.6 common kernels for
powerpc for sarge. You will find all that is needed at :
http://people.debian.org/~luther/kernel
or the apt source :
deb http://people.debian.org/~luther/kernel ./
These packages include :
1) backported k
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 08:02:38PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 05:57:12PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 05:33:29PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > Sure, i am not stupid, i perfectly noticed that, now my question is why
> > > do you
> > > want to
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 11:16:38PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I'm trying to detect a debian kernel from uname -r.
>
> My suggestion would be to add a "-debian" at the end of the localversion
> of kernels _patched_/modified by debian, and to leave the localversion
> compl
Hello:
Using the netinst CD , I'm trying to install the stable version of debian,
(i386)
The PC has an Realtek onboard network card, I faced some errors installing,
so, I decided to desactivate it an added a 3com905 network card, with this
one the card's configuration procces passed whito
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 05:35:56PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> Quite honestly, I don't think we deviate enough from the mainline kernels
> enough to warrant such a thing. The main patches we include are the stable
> kernel patches, misc fixes backported from linus' git repo, architecture
> patc
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 09:42:17PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 08:02:38PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 05:57:12PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > > On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 05:33:29PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > Sure, i am not stupid, i perfe
Hi,
Since version 9.006 of kernel-package it supports building of the separate
kernel-manual package, which will contain all the manual pages, included
in kernel documentation. Accordingly, these manual pages will be dropped
from kernel-doc/linux-doc package. Since different versions of the ke
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 03:04:06AM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 09:42:17PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 08:02:38PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 05:57:12PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 0
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 02:54:47AM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 05:35:56PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> > Quite honestly, I don't think we deviate enough from the mainline kernels
> > enough to warrant such a thing. The main patches we include are the stable
> > kerne
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 08:08:45PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 12:18:50PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Sven Luther wrote:
> > > So, the installer needs to be fixed ASAP.
> > Getting a useable kernel into testing is a prerequsite for making the
> > installer use it, not the o
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 11:52:53AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 02:32:34AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > I don't see any reason here for the release team to override the
> > out-of-date hppa packages. Removing them is an ftp team task, not a
> > release team task.
> Wh
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 02:32:34AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 08:54:09AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > Now that linux 2.6.12-6 is ready to enter testing, (just waiting an RM
> > override for the hppa flavour rename)
>
> I don't see any reason here for the release tea
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 04:14:36AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 11:52:53AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 02:32:34AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > I don't see any reason here for the release team to override the
> > > out-of-date hppa packages
Sven Luther wrote:
> (CCing debian-release, as this may concern them, or they might have input, so
> i hope they will also pick up the hppa flavour rename hint above, oh, and we
> should kill all 2.6.8 and 2.6.11 packages from etch and sid now).
No, existing kernels that are a) sources of udebs of
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 11:09:45AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > (CCing debian-release, as this may concern them, or they might have input,
> > so
> > i hope they will also pick up the hppa flavour rename hint above, oh, and we
> > should kill all 2.6.8 and 2.6.11 packages from
Sven Luther wrote:
> So, the installer needs to be fixed ASAP.
Getting a useable kernel into testing is a prerequsite for making the
installer use it, not the other way around.
In other words, the changes you recently made to base-installer for
powerpc to make it install the new kernel that is no
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 12:18:50PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > So, the installer needs to be fixed ASAP.
>
> Getting a useable kernel into testing is a prerequsite for making the
> installer use it, not the other way around.
sure, will happen as soon as it gets hinted in.
>
26 matches
Mail list logo
