Mediation not Politics (Re: removal of svenl from the project)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Abstract "Please can't we all just get along?" Ok, I'm not quite that naive, but I would like to see (or proof of previous attempts at) conciliation before such a highly political approach as a formal expulsion request to a personnel issue. Further

Bug#357193: linux-image-2.6.15-1-686: Kernel oops when syncing Palm Zire 21

Package: linux-image-2.6.15-1-686 Version: 2.6.15-8 Severity: normal I'm getting a kernel oops when using this stock kernel, trying to hotsync my Palm Zire 21 with my computer. The text of the oops from dmesg is attached. Once the oops occurs, the /dev/pilot device (created by udev) and the /dev/

Bug#357191: linux-image-2.6.15-1-k7-smp not recognizing keyboard mouse

Package: linux-image-2.6.15-1-k7-smp Version: 2.6.15-8 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system after I install of linux-image 2.6.15-1-k7-smp (or 2.6.15-1-k7 or even 2.6.15-1-486) and reboot i can no longer use keyboard or mouse. I must log in from ssh. this is very problema

Bug#355580: Bug 355580: output of fdisk

Thanks for writing. Here's the answers you requested. My RAID1 and LINEAR-based system had the following line in /etc/modprobe.d/md: install md_mod /sbin/modprobe sata_promise; /sbin/modprobe --ignore-install md_mod how did that line get added? none of my raids uses that nor does it seem to

Re: timeline for next kernel update round

Hi Moritz, On Wednesday, 15 Mar 2006, you wrote: > Hi Moritz, > > On Wednesday, 15 Mar 2006, you wrote: > > Frans Pop wrote: > > > On Wednesday 15 March 2006 00:15, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > > > The update is built and tested, it'll appear soon. It contains three > > > > ABI changing security

Re: timeline for next kernel update round

Hi Moritz, On Wednesday, 15 Mar 2006, you wrote: > Frans Pop wrote: > > On Wednesday 15 March 2006 00:15, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > > The update is built and tested, it'll appear soon. It contains three > > > ABI changing security fixes, so the ABI will be bumped. I can't speak > > > for d-i.

Re: removal of svenl from the project

#include * [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Wed, Mar 15 2006, 01:32:41PM]: > I have no dog in this fight, and I do not take sides, but Debian > needs good developers it seems that some developers want to drive > as many people out of Debian as possible. At this rate Debian will > cease to be revelant, just

Bug#352460: marked as done (linux-image-2.6-k7: it821x driver needed in the initrd image)

Your message dated Wed, 15 Mar 2006 23:50:46 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#352460: linux-image-2.6-k7: it821x driver needed in the initrd image has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Processed: Re: Bug#355580: initramfs-tools: fails to load required modules, boot fails

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 355580 normal Bug#355580: initramfs-tools: fails to load required modules, boot fails Severity set to `normal'. > tags 355580 moreinfo Bug#355580: initramfs-tools: fails to load required modules, boot fails Tags were: patch Tags added: moreinf

Bug#355580: initramfs-tools: fails to load required modules, boot fails

severity 355580 normal tags 355580 moreinfo stop On Mon, 06 Mar 2006, Moshe Yudkowsky wrote: > Three problems: no installation of module; no loading of "linear" module > in md; using mdrun in scripts/local-top/md give incorrect md modules. ok. > The hook function "manual_add_modules" uses modp

Re: removal of svenl from the project

On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 10:59:46AM -0500, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > So far, I have never took the time to study the detail of the expulsion > process, so sorry if this mail is inappropriate. But be sure that I will > do everything I can as a DD to stop Sven's expulsion. Here another DD that

Re: removal of svenl from the project

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear Friends, First of all i apologise for my poor english (portuguese :-)) I follow de dev lists of debian for several months now, my knowlege in linux whas not so good so i never applyed to be a developper and also my time isnt much :-(. (maybe

Bug#354458: Kernel panic after upgrading initramfs-tools

hello manuel, On Wed, 15 Mar 2006, Manuel Bilderbeek wrote: > > if lilo doesn't work out for you use from knoppix (adapt to your device) > > grub-install --root-directory=/mnt/hda1 /dev/hda > > I'll first try with lilo if you can confirm that I should indeed run > udev as you said, ignoring the

Bug#356946: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.15-1-686: the power off button does not work anymore)

Your message dated Wed, 15 Mar 2006 22:36:01 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line linux-image-2.6.15-1-686: the power off button does not work anymore has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Re: removal of svenl from the project

martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > also sprach Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.03.15.1512 +0100]: >> It seems that the project is splitting in two groups basically: >> The people that wants to work together and release Etch, and the >> people that with a reason or not wants to

Re: removal of svenl from the project

Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I strongly oppose to such an expulsion. > > It amazes me that people oppose expulsion, but are perfectly happy to > allow the DAMs to decide whether or not a NM is to be let into the > project. Why do we trust the DAM's judgement in one scenario but n

Bug#354458: Kernel panic after upgrading initramfs-tools

Hi, 2006/3/15, maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > ok so that's the bug you hit, it's closed by 0.55b > lilo doesn't grog that the initd.img changed without beeing rerun > grub is much friendlier in those regards. So I've read. > yes you need > a) proc from outside the chroot or maybe it's

Bug#354458: Fwd: Kernel panic after upgrading initramfs-tools

On Wed, 15 Mar 2006, Manuel Bilderbeek wrote: > Hi, resending because of wrong address. thanks sorry for the typo > 2006/3/15, maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > do you use lilo? > > Yes I do. ok so that's the bug you hit, it's closed by 0.55b lilo doesn't grog that the initd.img chan

Re: timeline for next kernel update round

Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > Hi Moritz, > > On Wednesday, 15 Mar 2006, you wrote: > > Frans Pop wrote: > > > On Wednesday 15 March 2006 00:15, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > > > The update is built and tested, it'll appear soon. It contains three > > > > ABI changing security fixes, so the ABI will

Bug#354458: Kernel panic after upgrading initramfs-tools

Hi, I'm getting rather desperate: would it be useful to do a apt-get install --reinstall linux-image-2.6.15-1-k7 from the chroot? 2006/3/15, Manuel Bilderbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi again, > > Some more info: > > 2006/3/15, maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > if yes fetch 0.55 from inco

Bug#354458: Kernel panic after upgrading initramfs-tools

Hi again, Some more info: 2006/3/15, maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > if yes fetch 0.55 from incoming.debian.org or unstable. Unstable has 0.53c and in incoming.debian.org I only see one file "REPORT". So, I have no idea how to get it. -- Grtjs, Manuel PS: http://manuel.msxnet.org/

Bug#348782: linux-image-2.6-686: [aha152_cs] BUG: soft lockup detected on CPUU#0!

On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 11:00:43PM +0100, Philippe Bourcier wrote: > Package: linux-image-2.6-686 > Version: 2.6.15-8 > Followup-For: Bug #348782 > > > hi all, > > debian 2.6.15-8 doesn't resolve: > > I have a scsi tower (2*dd, cdrom reader, cdrom burner) connected to my > laptop with a pcm

Re: removal of svenl from the project

On Wednesday 15 March 2006 08:40, Andres Salomon wrote: > The DAM has accepted the request; please send seconds directly to > [EMAIL PROTECTED], cc'ing me as well. > > For the people who seem to think that there are more constructive > ways of dealing w/ this issue rather than the expulsion process

Bug#354458: Kernel panic after upgrading initramfs-tools

Hi, 2006/3/15, maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > do you use lilo? Yes I do. > if yes fetch 0.55 from incoming.debian.org or unstable. But, will it be able to update my initrd.img via the chroot? As you have read, I'm having loads of trouble with that. > did you get dropped to a shell,

Bug#354458: Kernel panic after upgrading initramfs-tools

Hi Running the latest Knoppix with a 2.6.12 kernel doesn't help. Please let me know what I can do to get my system booting again... Thanks in advance. -- Grtjs, Manuel PS: http://manuel.msxnet.org/

Re: Bug#293569: Add megaraid to /etc/mkinitrd/modules doesn't work out

Hi, Do you finally resolve this problem because I have exactly the same problem and searching the solution. Thanks Cécile -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: removal of svenl from the project

On Wednesday 15 March 2006 08:40, Andres Salomon wrote: > The DAM has accepted the request; please send seconds directly to > [EMAIL PROTECTED], cc'ing me as well. > > For the people who seem to think that there are more constructive > ways of dealing w/ this issue rather than the expulsion process

Re: removal of svenl from the project

also sprach Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.03.15.1512 +0100]: > It seems that the project is splitting in two groups basically: > The people that wants to work together and release Etch, and the > people that with a reason or not wants to see it delayed. The > minute after the release tea

Bug#354458: Kernel panic after upgrading initramfs-tools

Hi, I got the same problem again, and it seems it has been caused by yet another update of initramfs-tools, as there's a 0.53c version in my /var/cache/apt/archives The problem is that this time I don't have the other kernel image to boot. So, I'm writing this from a boot from an old Knoppix cd.

Re: removal of svenl from the project

On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 09:40:15AM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote: > The DAM has accepted the request; please send seconds directly to > [EMAIL PROTECTED], cc'ing me as well. > > For the people who seem to think that there are more constructive ways > of dealing w/ this issue rather than the expulsio

initramfs-tools_0.55b_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: initramfs-tools_0.55b.dsc to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.55b.dsc initramfs-tools_0.55b.tar.gz to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.55b.tar.gz initramfs-tools_0.55b_all.deb to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.55b_all.deb Announcing to debia

Re: removal of svenl from the project

On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 05:56:10PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 05:56:05PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > > I was a bit short on you, because you started to make noise about the reason > > for the refusal being a #include being wrongly placed in the patch, and a > > print

Processing of initramfs-tools_0.55b_i386.changes

initramfs-tools_0.55b_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: initramfs-tools_0.55b.dsc initramfs-tools_0.55b.tar.gz initramfs-tools_0.55b_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "un

Re: removal of svenl from the project

On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 05:56:05PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > I was a bit short on you, because you started to make noise about the reason > for the refusal being a #include being wrongly placed in the patch, and a > printk that was not strictly necessary, which i think for someone like you or >

Re: removal of svenl from the project

On 3/14/06, Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I am going through the expulsion process to have Sven Luther removed > from the project. The process is outlined here: > , > and I have already completed step 1. >

Re: removal of svenl from the project

On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 01:00:19PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote: > Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I know Sven may sometimes be a bit overpresent in some trolls, he also=20 > > may answer too quick, without having read the mail he answers to=20 > > correctly enough. But AFAICT, I'

Re: removal of svenl from the project

On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 05:00, Matthew Garrett wrote: > Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I know Sven may sometimes be a bit overpresent in some trolls, he also=20 > > may answer too quick, without having read the mail he answers to=20 > > correctly enough. But AFAICT, I've always seen h

Re: removal of svenl from the project

Le Mer 15 Mars 2006 15:05, Andres Salomon a écrit : > On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 11:25 +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > Le Mer 15 Mars 2006 03:01, Andres Salomon a écrit : > > > Hi, > > > > > > I am going through the expulsion process to have Sven Luther > > > removed from the project. The process is

Bug#356868: does not work with busybox-cvs-static

On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Mar 14, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > What what about initramfs-tools adding the conflict? > > Why? It does nicely with busybox-cvs-static. udev can't deal with > > it. > busybox-cvs-static providing a broken shell could be a good

Re: removal of svenl from the project

Pierre Habouzit writes: > I strongly oppose to such an expulsion. So do I. -- John Hasler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: removal of svenl from the project

On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 09:01:09PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote: > Some might argue that we should just kick him from the channel and > remove his commit access to the debian-kernel project, but that does not > solve the problem of him abusing other teams, as well as his abusive > mailing list posts

Bug#340508: missing modules on s390/s390x

waldi added s390 support to initramfs-tools as of version 0.54. 0.55 is in incoming.debian.org and should be available in unstable soon. klibc-1.2.4-1 has an important s390 fix. so testing those releases are highly welcome. you can rebuild your initramfs after installation of aboves packages with

Bug#356850: marked as done (initramfs-tools: upon udev upgrade, system becomes unbootable if using lilo)

Your message dated Wed, 15 Mar 2006 06:47:13 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#356850: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.55b has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#355595: marked as done (initramfs-tools - s390 modules)

Your message dated Wed, 15 Mar 2006 06:47:13 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#355595: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.55b has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#355486: marked as done (initramfs-tools: please consider to include sata_mv)

Your message dated Wed, 15 Mar 2006 06:47:13 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#355486: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.55b has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#355162: marked as done ([alpha] DAC960 not included in initrd after installation)

Your message dated Wed, 15 Mar 2006 06:47:13 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#355162: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.55b has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#354708: marked as done (cpio: ./sbin/vgchange: No such file or directory)

Your message dated Wed, 15 Mar 2006 06:47:13 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#354708: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.55b has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#352738: marked as done (initramfs-tools: url to source in copyright file out of date)

Your message dated Wed, 15 Mar 2006 06:47:13 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#352738: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.55b has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#339092: marked as done (initramfs-tools: check if filesystem is already present in kernel)

Your message dated Wed, 15 Mar 2006 06:47:13 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#339092: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.55b has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#330680: cifs: files with large file names are missing

> I use cifs to mount a couple of samba shares and files with long names are not > displayed. When I access the same shares, using LAN Browsing in konqueror, the > files are there. It looks like it has too do with the total length (inclusive > directories) of the filename. for example: > > /incomi

Re: removal of svenl from the project

The DAM has accepted the request; please send seconds directly to [EMAIL PROTECTED], cc'ing me as well. For the people who seem to think that there are more constructive ways of dealing w/ this issue rather than the expulsion process: http://squishy.cc/svenl.txt This is a lot from two weeks ago,

Re: removal of svenl from the project

On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 11:25 +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > Le Mer 15 Mars 2006 03:01, Andres Salomon a écrit : > > Hi, > > > > I am going through the expulsion process to have Sven Luther removed > > from the project. The process is outlined here: > >

Re: removal of svenl from the project

Mike Bird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Your accusation fails to allege sufficient facts to constitute > an allegation of defamation. The facts have previously been discussed elsewhere. I replied merely to point out that Sven does not always apologise for his behaviour. > Rather than wasting lis

Re: removal of svenl from the project

On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 09:01:09PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote: > I am going through the expulsion process to have Sven Luther removed > from the project. The process is outlined here: > , > and I have already completed step 1.

Re: removal of svenl from the project

On Tue, Mar 14, 2006, Andres Salomon wrote: > Hi, Hi! > I am going through the expulsion process to have Sven Luther removed > from the project. Hahaha oh wow. You got it the wrong way, you should only do that _after_ someone posts http://zoy.org/~sam/ftwcal.jpeg to d-d-a. Now I have no ot

Re: removal of svenl from the project

Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I know Sven may sometimes be a bit overpresent in some trolls, he also=20 > may answer too quick, without having read the mail he answers to=20 > correctly enough. But AFAICT, I've always seen him apologies when he=20 > did so (I can provide links if yo

Bug#343463: (no subject)

> I just posted a patch on the linux-usb-devel mailing list. Please > check it out. Nice! In the meantime, I've plugged the keyboard in a PS/2 plug with an adapter I had. It works fine. -- PS: Remove "invalid" from the email address string if you expect a reply. Mathieu Roy + | Thalie

Re: removal of svenl from the project

Le mardi 14 mars 2006 à 21:01 -0500, Andres Salomon a écrit : > Hi, > > I am going through the expulsion process to have Sven Luther removed > from the project. If this is a joke, it's not funny. I happen to prefer Andrew Suffield's humour. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\ : :'

Re: removal of svenl from the project

Le Mer 15 Mars 2006 03:01, Andres Salomon a écrit : > Hi, > > I am going through the expulsion process to have Sven Luther removed > from the project. The process is outlined here: > >, and I have already completed step 1. I st