Re: Root on LVM bug

On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 08:35:08PM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > I recently installed etch on an amd64 box which previously had Fedora. > It had a small ext2 /boot and large LVM, so I shrunk Fedora's volume and > made a new one for Debian, where I installed everything. I included the > LVM modu

Re: [etch] driver updates for 2.6.18?

On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 04:53:15PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote: > I would like to update a few drivers in 2.6.18 for the next point > release of etch: I have a large update for xen. It is taken from the 3.1 branch, which seems to work fine with the xen in etch (better than the released version

Bug#439219: linux-2.6: Update to forcedeth driver

Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-13etch1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Attached find a patch series to update the forcedeth driver in 2.6.18.dfsg.1-13etch1 to the version found in upstream kernel 2.6.22.3. Although the initial reason for this patch vanised by an bios update I am still

Processed: tagging 419197

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 > tags 419197 + pending Bug#419197: CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND is experimental and breaks applications There were no tags set. Bug#419198: kooka seems to be scanning, but isn't Bug#419199: kook

Processed: tagging 439020

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 > tags 439020 + pending Bug#439020: Please could CONFIG_TCG_TPM be set to 'm' There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me

Processed: tagging 435257

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 > tags 435257 + pending Bug#435257: linux-image-2.6.22-1-686 doesn't detect Samsung ML-2010 USB printer There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping processin

Bug#439224: CVE-2007-2172 kernel-source-2.4.27

Package: kernel-source-2.4.27 Version: 2.4.27-10sarge5 out of bounds bug also exists in kernel-source-2.4.27 I suggest to use dn_fib-out-of-bounds.patch from linux-patch-debian-2.6.18 to fix the problem. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C

Bug#439225: CVE-2007-2172 kernel-source-2.6.8

Package: kernel-source-2.6.8 Version: 2.6.8-16sarge7 out of bounds bug also exists in kernel-source-2.6.8 I suggest to use dn_fib-out-of-bounds.patch from linux-patch-debian-2.6.18 to fix the problem. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont

Bug#439188: marked as done ()

Your message dated Thu, 23 Aug 2007 13:57:46 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#439188: has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reop

Processing of initramfs-tools_0.90a_i386.changes

initramfs-tools_0.90a_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: initramfs-tools_0.90a.dsc initramfs-tools_0.90a.tar.gz initramfs-tools_0.90a_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "un

Some of your Debian packages might need attention

Dear Debian kernel team, The following possible problem(s) were detected in the package(s) you maintain in Debian: === linux-2.6: = This package has 10 RC bug(s) more than 30 days old: - #242866 drivers containing firmware blobs - #243022

initramfs-tools_0.90a_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: initramfs-tools_0.90a.dsc to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.90a.dsc initramfs-tools_0.90a.tar.gz to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.90a.tar.gz initramfs-tools_0.90a_all.deb to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.90a_all.deb Override entries

Processed: reopening 439188

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7 > reopen 439188 Bug#439188: Bug reopened, originator not changed. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system ad

Re: Root on LVM bug

On Thu, 2007-08-23 at 11:41 +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 08:35:08PM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > > I recently installed etch on an amd64 box which previously had Fedora. > > It had a small ext2 /boot and large LVM, so I shrunk Fedora's volume and > > made a new one

Re: initramfs-tools / cryptoroot

hello Daniel, On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, Daniel Reichelt wrote: > I'm administering several linux hosts, which are all set up to boot from a > luks-encrypted partition (which partly live in LVM). I was hacked off to have > to go down to the basement and enter the passwords manually on each and every >

Bug#439242: ipw3945-modules-2.6.21-2-686: Older prebuilt package takes precedence over newer package built with m-a

Package: ipw3945-modules-2.6.21-2-686 Version: 1.2.2-1+2.6.21-6 Severity: normal The versioning info of the prebuilt packages seems to be different from the versioning used by module-assistant, so that after auto-install'ing the ipw3945-1.2.2-1 kernel module, aptitude wants to "upgrade" it to Debi

Re: Root on LVM bug

maximilian attems wrote: lvm2 is prone to data corruption with empty vg. Is this recorded in the BTS? -- Alexander E. Patrakov -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [etch] driver updates for 2.6.18?

On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 01:34:26PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 04:53:15PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote: > > I would like to update a few drivers in 2.6.18 for the next point > > release of etch: > > I have a large update for xen. It is taken from the 3.1 branch, which >

Bug#439072: snd-intel8x0 line-in not working in later 2.6.x kernels

On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 08:10:19PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > Hi Adrian, > > On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 04:13:19AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > > > I'm reporting this bug that I have been seeing for a while and which is > > > a regression from a few months/years ago - the line-in input simply > > >

Processed: tagging 439224, tagging 439225

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7 > tags 439224 security Bug#439224: CVE-2007-2172 kernel-source-2.4.27 There were no tags set. Tags added: security > tags 439225 security Bug#439225: CVE-2007-2172 kernel-source-2.6.8

Re: Reorganizing packages

Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > For that matter, if someone in the project decides that they have need for a > different kernel than the one the kernel team wants to ship (for a > particular port, or to support older hardware, or to support a newer > cutting-edge kernel design, or for

Re: [etch] driver updates for 2.6.18?

On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 10:51:01AM -0600, dann frazier wrote: > Each of those sounds like a reasonable thing to fix in a point > release, but such a large change does not. I don't see how we can > demonstrate confidence that such a change will not cause regressions. Known and ignored because of th

linux-latest-2.6_6etch2_ia64.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: kernel-image-2.6-itanium-smp_2.6.18+6etch2_ia64.deb to pool/main/l/linux-latest-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-itanium-smp_2.6.18+6etch2_ia64.deb kernel-image-2.6-itanium_2.6.18+6etch2_ia64.deb to pool/main/l/linux-latest-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-itanium_2.6.18+6etch2_ia64.deb kernel-image-2.6-m

Bug#438617: marked as done (linux-image-2.6-ixp4xx: Still depends on vulnerable kernel image linux-image-2.6.18-4*)

Your message dated Thu, 23 Aug 2007 19:56:15 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#438617: fixed in linux-latest-2.6 6etch2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

linux/types.h <-> glibc interferences

Hi folks linux/types.h exports some POSIX types. It can be asked to stop this with __KERNEL_STRICT_NAMES. features.h defines this. So currently anything works if features.h is included before linux/types.h. This is not properly fixable by the glibc. The attached patch fixes it in linux, but I'm u

Processed: Re: Bug#436166: [Pkg-lirc-maint] Bug#436166: Progress notes

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 436166 lirc Bug#436166: Please ship bttv.h in linux-headers-* Bug reassigned from package `linux-2.6' to `lirc'. > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrat

Bug#436166: [Pkg-lirc-maint] Bug#436166: Progress notes

reassign 436166 lirc stop On Sat, Aug 11, 2007, Stephen Gran wrote: > bttv.h is a 'private' header, and not included in the kernel headers > shipped in Debian. This is why there is an attempt at versioned bttv.h > headers in lirc itself. It's a bad hack, but I'm not sure what else can > be done.

Re: [kernel] r9352 - in dists/etch/linux-2.6/debian: . patches/features/all/drivers patches/series

On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 10:07:32AM +, Frederik Sch??ler wrote: > Author: fs > Date: Thu Aug 23 10:07:32 2007 > New Revision: 9352 > > Log: > Add support for 3ware 9650SE controllers. Where's the bug report for this, and how do you know it doesn't regress anything with other controllers? --

Bug#439072: snd-intel8x0 line-in not working in later 2.6.x kernels

On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 07:04:13PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > While browsing kernel options, I noticed: > > > > Please contact Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> if you had to > > say Y here because your hardware is not properly supported > > by ALSA. > > > > ...in the description of

Re: linux/types.h <-> glibc interferences

On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 10:08:44PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > linux/types.h exports some POSIX types. It can be asked to stop this > with __KERNEL_STRICT_NAMES. features.h defines this. So currently > anything works if features.h is included before linux/types.h. > This is not properly fixable

Re: [etch] driver updates for 2.6.18?

On Thu, 23 Aug 2007, dann frazier wrote: > On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 01:34:26PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > > seems to work fine with the xen in etch (better than the released > > version from Fedora). The summary of the functional changes is > > | 244 files changed, 11100 insertions(+), 6047 dele

Re: linux/types.h <-> glibc interferences

On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 02:46:14PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > Is there some specific reported issue that this change is intended to fix? > I haven't noticed any complaints about the current behavior. #434040 and a hand full of packages on the buildd. > Anyway, it's my understanding that users

Processed: severity of 402562 is important

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7 > # SRM considers lack of hardware support to be important > severity 402562 important Bug#402562: Please support newer 3ware controllers Severity set to `important' from `wishlist' >

Processed: tagging 402562

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 > tags 402562 + pending Bug#402562: Please support newer 3ware controllers Tags were: patch Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you ne

Re: initramfs-tools / cryptoroot

Hi Max, > why are you not using ipconfig, the klibc dhclient equiv. > if it doesn't work for you i'd be happy to know why!? 1) I've overlooked udphcpc is compiled into initramfs-tools' busybox 2) I've tried (roughly) this afternoon to use udhcpc, it just says it's missing some script. Gotta look

Re: [etch] driver updates for 2.6.18?

On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 07:53:49PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > xen in etch is way beyond broken. > i don't even start looking when the bug report mentions xen. > the bts has *way* too much xen bugs. > i doubt it is worth the effort to isolate them to some specific > changesets. > > please ta

Re: initramfs-tools / cryptoroot

hello daniel, On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 12:28:22AM +0200, Daniel Reichelt wrote: > > > why are you not using ipconfig, the klibc dhclient equiv. > > if it doesn't work for you i'd be happy to know why!? > > 1) I've overlooked udphcpc is compiled into initramfs-tools' busybox > 2) I've tried (rough

Bug#439295: linux-image-2.6.21-2-686: System fails to boot

Package: linux-image-2.6.21-2-686 Version: 2.6.21-6 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system *** Please type your report below this line *** After upgrading from linux-image-2.6.18-4-686 to linux-image-2.6.21-2-686, the system fails to boot because the kernel now suddenly sees ha

Re: initramfs-tools / cryptoroot

Hi, > On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 12:28:22AM +0200, Daniel Reichelt wrote: >>> why are you not using ipconfig, the klibc dhclient equiv. >>> if it doesn't work for you i'd be happy to know why!? > wasn't talking about udphcpc but ipconfig see usage in > /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/nfs boils d

Re: initramfs-tools / cryptoroot

maximilian attems wrote: > hello daniel, > > On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 12:28:22AM +0200, Daniel Reichelt wrote: >>> why are you not using ipconfig, the klibc dhclient equiv. >>> if it doesn't work for you i'd be happy to know why!? >> 1) I've overlooked udphcpc is compiled into initramfs-tools' busy

Bug#439072: snd-intel8x0 line-in not working in later 2.6.x kernels

forwarded 439072 https://bugtrack.alsa-project.org/alsa-bug/view.php?id=3335 thanks On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 11:17:28PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 07:04:13PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > While browsing kernel options, I noticed: > > > > > > Please contact Adrian Bun

Processed: Re: Bug#439072: snd-intel8x0 line-in not working in later 2.6.x kernels

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 439072 https://bugtrack.alsa-project.org/alsa-bug/view.php?id=3335 Bug#439072: snd-intel8x0 line-in not working in later 2.6.x kernels Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to https://bugtrack.alsa-project.org/alsa-bug/view.php?id=

Processed: retitle 389807 to xen modules packages make debsums fail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7 > retitle 389807 xen modules packages make debsums fail Bug#389807: Breaks debsums Changed Bug title to `xen modules packages make debsums fail' from `Breaks debsums'. > End of messag

Processed: reassign 425692 to linux-2.6

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7 > reassign 425692 linux-2.6 Bug#425692: enabling CONFIG_PARAVIRT causes fglrx and vmware to be unusable Warning: Unknown package 'linux-image-2.6.21-1-686' Bug reassigned from package `

Processed: forcibly merging 419943 425692

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7 > forcemerge 419943 425692 Bug#419943: linux-2.6: CONFIG_PARAVIRT breaks some external modules Bug#425692: enabling CONFIG_PARAVIRT causes fglrx and vmware to be unusable Forcibly Merge

Processed: block 430921 with 419943, tagging 419943

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7 > block 430921 with 419943 Bug#419943: linux-2.6: CONFIG_PARAVIRT breaks some external modules Bug#430921: nvidia-kernel-source: Module fails to load on 2.6.21 Was not blocked by any bu

Processed: Found

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > found 360554 0.5.8.1-9 Bug#360554: hal: disk LED blinks constantly Bug marked as found in version 0.5.8.1-9. > found 293259 0.57.11.1 Bug#293259: synaptic: attempts to get erroneous URL for hpijs changelog Bug marked as found in version 0.57.11.1. > f

Processed: severity of 439295 is important

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7 > severity 439295 important Bug#439295: linux-image-2.6.21-2-686: System fails to boot Severity set to `important' from `critical' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please c