Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 581353 important
Bug #581353 [linux-2.6] System badly crashes completely
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
581353: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bu
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.93.4
Severity: normal
Hello,
i have some SAN-Discs that should be grouped at boot time. After my
Update yesterday, multipath does not start at boot time whith the
an error like this:
... /lib64/multipath/libcheckdirectio.so cannot open shared object file
Sorry,
I hav also noticet similar behaviour of brken framebuffer. On my nx9420
laptop kernel 2.6.32-5 breaks synchronisation and I see resynched lines all
over the screen. This behaviour is tha same even if it enters X or stays in
single user mode. I've tested also
linux-image-2.6.33-2-686_2.6.33-1~ex
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 581353 important
Bug #581353 [linux-2.6] System badly crashes completely
Ignoring request to change severity of Bug 581353 to the same value.
> tags 581353 moreinfo
Bug #581353 [linux-2.6] System badly crashes completely
Added tag(s) more
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 04:50:10PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> severity 581353 important
> tags 581353 moreinfo
> stop
>
> On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 11:55:42AM +0200, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
> > Package: linux-2.6
> > Version: 2.6.32-9
> > Severity: grave
>
> very outdated, please try to reprod
severity 581353 important
tags 581353 moreinfo
stop
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 11:55:42AM +0200, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.32-9
> Severity: grave
very outdated, please try to reproduce with uptodate 2.6.32-12.
thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-req
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.26-21lenny4
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
-- Package-specific info:
** Version:
Linux version 2.6.26-2-amd64 (Debian 2.6.26-21lenny4) (da...@debian.org) (gcc
version 4.1.3 20080704 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.2-25)) #1 SMP Tue Mar 9
22:29:32 UTC 2010
Here are a co
On 2010-05-11 17:02:17 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2010-05-11 16:11:12 +0200, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
> > > > I can see, that the boot process is going on, until X starts.
> > >
> > > Ditto, and the monitor wakes up, but with a corrupt image.
> >
> > my system really hangs.
>
> Note: conce
On 2010-05-11 11:36:58 -0400, Jeff Ratliff wrote:
> Workaround is to blacklist the nouveau driver.
>
> In /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist.conf insert the line:
> blacklist nouveau
>
> However, recent updates in Sid fix this for me. Packages are
> libdrm-nouveau1 2.4.18-5
> xserver-xorg-video-nouve
Package: linux-2.6
Version: N/A
Severity: wishlist
Tags: l10n, patch
In attachment there is updated Czech translation of PO debconf template
(cs.po) for package linux-2.6, please include it.
Best regards
--
Michal Šimůnek
# Czech PO debconf template translation of linux-2.6.
# Copyright (C) 201
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 18:45:21 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2010-05-11 11:36:58 -0400, Jeff Ratliff wrote:
> > Workaround is to blacklist the nouveau driver.
> >
> > In /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist.conf insert the line:
> > blacklist nouveau
> >
> > However, recent updates in Sid fix this
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 19:39:31 +0200, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
> If required, I can send you the whole kernel.log, too.
>
Yes, please send the full kernel and X logs.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Am Dienstag, 11. Mai 2010 schrieb dann frazier:
> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 09:52:34AM +0200, Werner Opriel wrote:
> > > I haven't been able to reproduce this issue on my systems, for
> > > whatever reason. Would you be able to verify that this build fixes it
> > > for you?
> > > http://people.debia
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 07:03:25PM +0200, Werner Opriel wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 11. Mai 2010 schrieb dann frazier:
> > On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 09:52:34AM +0200, Werner Opriel wrote:
> > > > I haven't been able to reproduce this issue on my systems, for
> > > > whatever reason. Would you be able to ve
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 05:32:49PM +0200, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
> On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 04:50:10PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > severity 581353 important
> > tags 581353 moreinfo
> > stop
> >
> > On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 11:55:42AM +0200, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
> > > Package: linux-2.6
> >
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 07:51:52PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 05:32:49PM +0200, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
> > On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 04:50:10PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > > severity 581353 important
> > > tags 581353 moreinfo
> > > stop
> > >
> > > On Wed, May
On 2010-05-05, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 09:41:18PM +, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
>> Author: jmm
>> Date: Wed May 5 21:41:16 2010
>> New Revision: 15627
>>
>> Log:
>> Enable tomoyo (Closes: #562486)
>
> nack,
> according to above nobody did the size check.
Extensive
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 365349 + pending
Bug #365349 [linux-2.6] Add support for creating a "debuginfo" package
Bug #492676 [linux-2.6] linux-2.6: should be compatible with systemtap
Bug #5
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 08:18:51PM +0200, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
> There is nothing related. I reported a bug on 2.6.32-9 because it
> happened there. I can't run a newer kernel, i.e. 2.6.32-12,
2.6.32-9 is old and thus unsupported, you are out of luck there.
much happened since.
with snapshot you
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 365349 + pending
Bug #365349 [linux-2.6] Add support for creating a "debuginfo" package
Bug #492676 [linux-2.6] linux-2.6: should be compatible with systemtap
Bug #5
On 2010-05-12 19:12:20 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Please file your own separate bugs for your own issues.
Well, my issue seems to be the same as the reporter's (Hans-J. Ullrich).
At least I get (almost) the same kernel messages:
[drm] nouveau : PFIFO_INTR 0x0010 - Ch
repeated a lot of
Today the problem happens again, I'm start thinking it is related to the
presence of sparse files into tar archive... I'll do more investigation and
I'll let you know ASAP
--
Dario Fiumicello
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-9
Severity: normal
After upgrading (I also got an upgrade of various xorg-packages)
I have no more graphic on my Sony VGNN-BZ32VT laptop.
Grepping for kernel in the Xorg.0 log files produced:
grep -i kernel Xorg.0.log*
Xorg.0.log:Kernel command line: BOOT_IMA
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 23:50:11 +0200, Niklaus Giger wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.32-9
> Severity: normal
>
Please test 2.6.32-12.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Upgrading fixed this error. Please apologize for my not checking before.
You may close the bug.
Thanks for working hard for providing such a good Linux kernel for Debian!
Best regards
Niklaus Giger
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubs
Hello. It turns out there are big problems there is a new realtek driver
availble today:
http://www.realtek.com.tw/downloads/downloadsView.aspx?Langid=1&PNid=48&PFid=48&Level=5&Conn=4&DownTypeID=3&GetDown=false&Downloads=true#RTL8192SU
]
Inside it we read that
Firmware Version:
Firmware
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 579694
Bug #579694 {Done: Ben Hutchings } [firmware-nonfree]
firmware-nonfree: Please include rtl8192su/ r8192s_usb firmware into the
(unreleased) firmware-realtek binary package.
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed w
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 579694
Bug#579694: firmware-nonfree: Please include rtl8192su/ r8192s_usb firmware
into the (unreleased) firmware-realtek binary package.
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # data loss
> severity 581392 grave
Bug #581392 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.26-2-amd64: A couple of RAID4/RAID6
fixes from upstream.
Severity set to 'grave' from 'normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistan
Package: nfs-common
Version: 1:1.1.2-6lenny1
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Some user is the member of group "secure". I created a directory on NFS share
with owner "otheruser", group owner "secure", permissions 707 (rwx---rwx).
User can read this directory, but
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 581392 + pending
Bug #581392 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.26-2-amd64: A couple of RAID4/RAID6
fixes from upstream.
Added tag(s) pending.
>
End of message, stopping p
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 581392 2.6.32-12
Bug #581392 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.26-2-amd64: A couple of RAID4/RAID6
fixes from upstream.
There is no source info for the package 'linux-2.6' at version '2.6.32-12' with
architecture ''
Unable to make a source versi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 581392 + pending
Bug #581392 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.26-2-amd64: A couple of RAID4/RAID6
fixes from upstream.
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #581392 to t
Your message dated Thu, 13 May 2010 02:43:57 +0200
with message-id <20100513004357.gb13...@baikonur.stro.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#581430: solved by upgrading to
linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64
has caused the Debian Bug report #581430,
regarding linux-image-2.6.32-3-amd64: KMS does not work after up
On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 04:07 +0400, John Lepikhin wrote:
> Package: nfs-common
> Version: 1:1.1.2-6lenny1
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
> Justification: user security hole
>
>
> Some user is the member of group "secure". I created a directory on
> NFS share with owner "otheruser", group owner
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 581438 moreinfo
Bug #581438 [nfs-common] nfs-common: Permissions issue
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
581438: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=581438
De
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 581438 linux-2.6
Bug #581438 [nfs-common] nfs-common: Permissions issue
Bug reassigned from package 'nfs-common' to 'linux-2.6'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions nfs-utils/1:1.1.2-6lenny1.
> tags 581438 unreproducible
Bug #581438
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 407217 + pending
Bug #407217 [linux-2.6] Multicast broken in r8169 for one version of Thecus
N2100
Bug #486442 [linux-2.6] Multicast broken in r8169 for one version
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 573007 + pending
Bug #573007 [linux-2.6] NIC r8169 doesn t start at restart on kernel
linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-686
Added tag(s) pending.
>
End of message, stopping
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 407217 + pending
Bug #407217 [linux-2.6] Multicast broken in r8169 for one version of Thecus
N2100
Bug #486442 [linux-2.6] Multicast broken in r8169 for one version
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 15:47 +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 02:09:06PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> > On Tuesday 11 May 2010 12:32:45 Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> > > Thanks Max. Am currently testing it. Will report results in a day or two.
> >
> > The bug got trigger
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 573007 + pending
Bug #573007 [linux-2.6] NIC r8169 doesn t start at restart on kernel
linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-686
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #573007 to
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 03:37:00AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> I think you've done something wrong in building that kernel. This patch
> removes padding of the RX buffers so that they are order-1 rather than
> order-2 (or on the 3945, order-0 rather than order-1). I don't see any
> way you c
Hello Joe,
The file you sent in #580915 is outdated as the debconf templates for
the linux-2.6 package have been reviewed by debian-l10n-english in the
meantime.
Resycning your PO file with the current templates gives the attached
PO file.
Would you mind updating it and sending it back to this b
44 matches
Mail list logo