Hi,
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 18:43, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> First of all, I would like to know if anybody was able to fix this
>> problem that got kinda lost in the thread:
>
> I can't reproduce this on 2.6.35-rc1+
>
> Can you please test a 2.6.35-rc version? If you can still reproduce
> it
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-18
Severity: minor
I'm getting this warning for quite a while now, but not on every boot.
Stack traces below ide_pci_init_two differ slightly. I've also tried
the current experimental kernel, but the warning is still there (although
the stack trace is somewhat d
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 07:57:14PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Maybe since awk is essential by way of being a pre-depends of base-files
> both mawk and gawk should behave as if they were essential.
No.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 03:27:40AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 04:51:50PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > > Only because it's a cdebootstrap bug. Unless you see something that
> > > > causes
> > > > initramfs-tools to be pulled into the essential set (which I do not),
Bastian Blank writes:
> On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 04:51:50PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> > > Only because it's a cdebootstrap bug. Unless you see something that
>> > > causes
>> > > initramfs-tools to be pulled into the essential set (which I do not),
>> > > this
>> > > is a cdebootstrap bug
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # oops
> reopen 584744
Bug #584744 {Done: Ben Hutchings } [linux-2.6] linux-2.6:
radeonfb builtin on sparc and powerpc
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
584744: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrep
Your message dated Sun, 25 Jul 2010 18:11:37 +0100
with message-id <1280077897.4915.41.ca...@localhost>
and subject line Re: Bug#584744: linux-2.6: built-in radeonfb breaks DRM
has caused the Debian Bug report #584744,
regarding linux-2.6: radeonfb builtin on sparc and powerpc
to be marked as done.
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: normal
With the built-in radeonfb and KMS enabled by default, DRM is broken on eMacs.
See e.g. FDO#27502 [1].
Disabling KMS in /etc/modprobe.d/radeon-kms.conf works around the issue.
Not sure what a real fix would be in this case - is there a framebuffer driver
that
On Sun, 2010-07-25 at 15:30 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 15:16:50 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 01:12:42PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2010-07-25 at 09:27 +0300, Török Edwin wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > > Why does linux-tools-2.6 requ
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-18
Severity: normal
Hello,
I did not manage to use my PCI wireless card RTL8191SE with linux-
image-2.6.32-5-amd64 version 2.6.32-18.
The commad "modprobe r8192_pci" does not bring device to life.
Note that I did install the firmware-realtek package version 0.2
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 03:30:42PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Would it be possible to link it against libbfd.a instead?
I would just merge it into linux-kbuild-2.6, the only package building
userspace binaries.
Bastian
--
Conquest is easy. Control is not.
-- Kirk, "Mirror, M
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 15:16:50 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 01:12:42PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Sun, 2010-07-25 at 09:27 +0300, Török Edwin wrote:
> > [...]
> > > Why does linux-tools-2.6 require a specific version of binutils?
> > It uses libbfd.
>
> Okay, so
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 01:12:42PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-07-25 at 09:27 +0300, Török Edwin wrote:
> [...]
> > Why does linux-tools-2.6 require a specific version of binutils?
> It uses libbfd.
Okay, so linux-2.6 is now part of a much larger bunch of tightly coupled
packages.
Op 20100724 om 17:03 schreef Archive Administrator:
> linux-source-2.6.35_2.6.35~rc6-1~experimental.1_all.deb
> to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-source-2.6.35_2.6.35~rc6-1~experimental.1_all.deb
> (new) linux-support-2.6.35-rc6_2.6.35~rc6-1~experimental.1_all.deb optional
> devel
AFAIK is now 2.6.3
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 590226 linux-2.6
Bug #590226 [linux-tools-2.6] linux-tools-2.6: uninstallable
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-tools-2.6' to 'linux-2.6'.
> retitle 590226 linux-tools-2.6: depends on specific versions of binutils
Bug #590226 [linux-2.6]
On Sun, 2010-07-25 at 09:27 +0300, Török Edwin wrote:
[...]
> Why does linux-tools-2.6 require a specific version of binutils?
It uses libbfd.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed messa
16 matches
Mail list logo
