Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Not applicable to squeeze; LILO must install kernel hook
> tags 505609 + lenny
Bug #505609 {Done: dann frazier } [linux-2.6] Unbootable
after kernel upgrade: Lilo can't load kernel
Bug #535331 {Done: dann frazier } [linux-2.6] lilo not run
aft
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 590653 linux-2.6 2.6.32-15
Bug #590653 [linux-image-2.6-686] "lo: Disabled Privacy Extensions" in kernel
log every couple of seconds
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-image-2.6-686' to 'linux-2.6'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versi
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 08:19 +0200, Sammy Atmadja wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6-686
> Version: 2.6.32+27
> Severity: minor
>
> The system is a KVM guest (host is squeeze, qemu-kvm version 0.12.4+dfsg-1,
> kernel 2.6.32-5-amd64). /var/log/syslog looks like this:
>
> Jul 28 08:03:35 brakiri ker
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 09:42 +0200, ulysse31 wrote:
[...]
> kernel:[63659.784275] invalid opcode: [#1] SMP
[...]
> kernel:[63659.784275] [] kmem_cache_alloc+0x47/0x87
[...]
> kernel:[63659.784275] Code: 8b 75 00 39 ee 75 15 8b 75 10 8d 45 10 c7 45 34
> 01 00 00 00 39 c6 0f 84 a5 00 00 00 8
* Michael Biebl [Thu Jul 29, 2010 at 02:16:32AM +0200]:
> On 29.07.2010 01:37, Michael Prokop wrote:
> > * Michael Biebl [Thu Jul 29, 2010 at 01:13:01AM +0200]:
> >> for testing purposes, I installed the upstart binary as /sbin/upstart and
> >> created a symlink /sbin/init → /sbin/upstart
> >> T
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 10:11 +0200, Marco Bajo wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> I tried with camstream and skype (32bit version forced). With
> camstream
> nothing happened,
camstream versions before 0.27+dfsg-4 don't work with most recent camera
drivers.
> with skype the led near the webcam makes a single p
Your message dated Thu, 29 Jul 2010 01:12:27 +0100
with message-id <1280362347.13192.95.ca...@localhost>
and subject line Re: Bug#517716: Acknowledgement (linux-image-2.6.26-1-686:
ehci_hcd :00:02.2: HC died; cleaning up when importing photographs via PTP
using gthumb)
has caused the Debian B
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 590744
Bug #590744 {Done: Michael Prokop } [initramfs-tools] Fails to
boot if /sbin/init is a symlink
> retitle 590744 Fails to boot if /sbin/init is a non-relative symlink
Bug #590744 [initramfs-tools] Fails to boot if /sbin/init is a sym
reopen 590744
retitle 590744 Fails to boot if /sbin/init is a non-relative symlink
thanks
On 29.07.2010 01:37, Michael Prokop wrote:
> * Michael Biebl [Thu Jul 29, 2010 at 01:13:01AM +0200]:
>
>> for testing purposes, I installed the upstart binary as /sbin/upstart and
>> created a symlink /sbin
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 09:57 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 03:43 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 15:44 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > The pvhvm drivers for Xen allow a fully virtualised guest (aka HVM) to
> > > use the Xen PV disk and network interfaces t
Your message dated Thu, 29 Jul 2010 01:37:55 +0200
with message-id <2010-07-29t01-34...@devnull.michael-prokop.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#590744: Fails to boot if /sbin/init is a symlink
has caused the Debian Bug report #590744,
regarding Fails to boot if /sbin/init is a symlink
to be marked as d
* Michael Biebl [Thu Jul 29, 2010 at 01:13:01AM +0200]:
> for testing purposes, I installed the upstart binary as /sbin/upstart and
> created a symlink /sbin/init → /sbin/upstart
> This causes a boot failure, due to this check in /usr/share/initramfs-
> tools/init
> # Check init bootarg
> if [ -
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.97.2
Severity: normal
Hi,
for testing purposes, I installed the upstart binary as /sbin/upstart and
created a symlink /sbin/init → /sbin/upstart
This causes a boot failure, due to this check in /usr/share/initramfs-
tools/init
# Check init bootarg
if [ -n "${i
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 09:32:04 +0200
> Von: Bastian Blank
> An: Gerhard Pircher
> CC: debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
> Betreff: Re: How to add new platform flavours to linux-2.6 source code
package?
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 11:01:20PM +0200, Gerhard Pi
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 00:02:01 +0100
> Von: Ben Hutchings
> An: Gerhard Pircher , debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
> Betreff: Re: How to add new platform flavours to linux-2.6 source code
> package?
Thanks for the fast reply! I'll take a look at your sugge
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 588574 http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/7/20/213
Bug #588574 [linux-2.6] [ia64] gdb FTBFS and freezes / reboots the machine
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/7/20/213'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 03:35:54PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 10:44:32AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > Anything I can help with?
> Testing the new packages from [1]:
> | 052925077f22f79042934f25d03708eb18ebf1fe56f1d9d7b1c086dd72ee8f81
> linux-2.6_2.6.32-19~xen.1.diff.g
As a workaround instead of stopping and restarting you might want to use vmount
on the affected vservers:
# vmount foo -- -a
You will get some error messages for all already correctly mounted filesystems,
but you can enter your vserver again.
Running
###
for vserver in `vserver-stat | tail -n
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 10:44:32AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> Anything I can help with?
Testing the new packages from [1]:
| 052925077f22f79042934f25d03708eb18ebf1fe56f1d9d7b1c086dd72ee8f81
linux-2.6_2.6.32-19~xen.1.diff.gz
| 4c88c5bb57b68981f919323f61f272d42157c8be7bee107b7b58fb031d090d9d
l
Hi,
For the record, after more investigation, this appears not to be
related to the kernel at all (sorry) but ot a misbehaving DHCP server
that only answers on broadcast. My ISP must have changed its config.
$ cat /var/log/daemon.log.1 /var/log/daemon.log 2>/dev/null | grep
dhclient | cut -d':' -
Unfortunately the motherboard that I saw this problem on died. :(
I tried to reproduce it on my new Intel motherboard using
linux-image-2.6.26-2-686 v2.6.26-24 but could not do so.
Thanks.
Mike.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscrib
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 11:38:43AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 12:05 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > You can always decide to use HVM or PV. PV is already pretty well
> > supported.
> So is HVM and I see no reason not to offer users of Debian in a Xen
> guest the flexibility
Hi,
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 11:30 +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 11:09:41AM +0200, Daniel Tombeil wrote:
[...]
> > in netkey-mode. I'll post the setup-guide for reproduction and the
> > binary tcpdump ASAP.
>
> ok sorry overlooked, as wasn't in body, please make upstrea
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 12:06 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 03:44:01PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > The full series of patches can be found at
> > http://xenbits.xensource.com/gitweb?p=people/sstabellini/linux-pvhvm.git
> > in the branch 2.6.32-pvhvm
>
> I still veto the xe
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 12:05 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 10:44:32AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 11:18 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > This is no excuse, the installer uses the real PV kernel.
> > Not when running in an HVM guest it doesn't, which
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 03:44:01PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> The full series of patches can be found at
> http://xenbits.xensource.com/gitweb?p=people/sstabellini/linux-pvhvm.git
> in the branch 2.6.32-pvhvm
I still veto the xenfs change. For rationale see
<20100527225440.gc25...@wavehammer.wal
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 10:44:32AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 11:18 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > This is no excuse, the installer uses the real PV kernel.
> Not when running in an HVM guest it doesn't, which is the whole point of
> this driver.
You can always decide to u
Bastian Blank wrote:
severity 590658 important
thanks
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 09:42:13AM +0200, ulysse31 wrote:
Who?
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.26-24
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
No, the kernel is the system.
** Tainted: P (1)
* Proprietary mod
Hi,
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 10:50 +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 10:29:40AM +0200, Daniel Tombeil wrote:
> > Package: linux-2.6
> > Version: 2.6.32-18
> > Severity: important
> > Tags: squeeze
> >
> >
> >
> > -- Package-specific info:
> > ** Version:
> > Linux version 2
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 11:09:41AM +0200, Daniel Tombeil wrote:
>
> > see no posted evidence here, but anyway please post tcpdumps
> > and setup in upstream bugzilla.openvz.org and let us know bug nr
> > so that it can be tracked.
>
> I attached some ASCII-tcpdump output at the end of the report.
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 11:18 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> I did not request a copy of this mail, please respect that.
Sure, sorry about that.
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 09:43:50AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 09:37 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > We have this code already
I did not request a copy of this mail, please respect that.
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 09:43:50AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 09:37 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > We have this code already, so no extra round.
> In the xen flavour only though. I'd like to get these drivers into
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 10:29:40AM +0200, Daniel Tombeil wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.32-18
> Severity: important
> Tags: squeeze
>
>
>
> -- Package-specific info:
> ** Version:
> Linux version 2.6.32-5-openvz-amd64 (Debian 2.6.32-18) (b...@decadent.org.uk)
> (gcc version 4.3.5 (D
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 03:43 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 15:44 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > The pvhvm drivers for Xen allow a fully virtualised guest (aka HVM) to
> > use the Xen PV disk and network interfaces the same as a Xen guest
> > running paravirtualised, in addition
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-18
Severity: important
Tags: squeeze
-- Package-specific info:
** Version:
Linux version 2.6.32-5-openvz-amd64 (Debian 2.6.32-18) (b...@decadent.org.uk)
(gcc version 4.3.5 (Debian 4.3.5-2) ) #1 SMP Sat Jul 24 02:32:56 UTC 2010
** Command line:
BOOT_IMAGE=/boo
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 09:37 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 03:44:01PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > The full series of patches can be found at
> > http://xenbits.xensource.com/gitweb?p=people/sstabellini/linux-pvhvm.git
> > in the branch 2.6.32-pvhvm
>
> We have this code a
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 590658 important
Bug #590658 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.26-2-686-bigmem: 2.6.26-2 bigmem nfs4
kerberos kernel panic
Severity set to 'important' from 'critical'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistanc
severity 590658 important
thanks
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 09:42:13AM +0200, ulysse31 wrote:
Who?
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.26-24
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks the whole system
No, the kernel is the system.
> ** Tainted: P (1)
> * Proprietary module has been loaded.
Thi
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.26-24
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
I have a desktop machine running debian lenny, with nfs4/kerberos for home
directory accounting, which works great on my own machine.
But on a specific machine, it kernel panics all nights, when the u
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 03:44:01PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> The full series of patches can be found at
> http://xenbits.xensource.com/gitweb?p=people/sstabellini/linux-pvhvm.git
> in the branch 2.6.32-pvhvm
We have this code already, so no extra round.
Bastian
--
There's a way out of any ca
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 11:01:20PM +0200, Gerhard Pircher wrote:
> > book3s-amigaone
> > 44x-sam440ep
>
> 3. 'configs' keyword:
> Contrary to my expectations I had add 'configs' entries for my
> flavours, whereas the normal powerpc and powerpc64 flavours don't need
> it. Why can't the build syst
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 12:02:01AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 23:01 +0200, Gerhard Pircher wrote:
> > 2. 'image-file' keyword:
> > Does this keyword also affect the kernel image makefile target?
> No, it specifies the file to look at when checking that the kernel image
> si
42 matches
Mail list logo
