The problem reported as bug 631597 was worked around by booting with
"processor.nocst=1" parameter (solution was found in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727865 thread).
Does it solve also 63274 and 630031 bugs?
This is only a workaround. The real problem is probably somewhere in th
Someone here:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1186275
mentioned that booting with intel_idle.max_cstate=0 worked on his S10-3. I
just tried that with the Debian kernel and that did NOT work for me. However,
I don't know if that is because the ACPI sleep is not included in Debian (
(resending to new address)
Hi,
Sorry for the long silence.
The Anarcat wrote:
> Today I had a very special issue with my workstation. The display would
> start but freeze. Even though in the back things are still happening,
> the display isn't updated and the only way out is to go to TTY1
> (con
Hi Lars,
Lars Boegild Thomsen wrote:
> Someone here:
>
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1186275
>
> mentioned that booting with intel_idle.max_cstate=0 worked on his S10-3. I
> just tried that with the Debian kernel and that did NOT work for me.
Yes, Debian kernels do not include
On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 10:22 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> It might make sense to also use 'xen_raw_printk' as sometimes you don't
> get to see the panic - you end up with this unhelpfull message:
>
> (XEN) domain_crash_sync called from entry.S
> (XEN) Domain 0 (vcpu#0) crashed on cpu#0:
Actually it doesn't seem to be the same problem then. If you read the post I
linked previously "Dave" clearly state that his symptoms does not happen when
intel_idle is compiled "out". In my case intel_idle is not included and it
still hangs on wakeup.
--
Lars
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 07:25:58AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> On 08/30/2011 06:16 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> > I concur with Sean Finney that nfs-utils should Build-Depend on
> > libnfsidmap-dev >= 0.24 to ease backporting.
> >
> > I'm hoping to prepare nfs-utils 1.2.4 as a backport for squee
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 06:31:58PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> forcemerge 631187 636103
> tags 631187 + upstream
> quit
>
> Hi Julian,
>
> Julian Gilbey wrote:
>
> > ata2.00: detaching (SCSI 1:0:0:0)
> > BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0068
> > IP: [] elv
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Julian Gilbey wrote:
> #
> # > 3.0.0-3 also crashed on me
> found 636103 linux-2.6/3.0.0-3
Bug #636103 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.39-2-amd64: repeatedly crashes: general
protection fault, perhaps connected to ata2?
Bug #631187 [linux-2.6] Kern
Hello there,
I think I found a performance issue in the kernel (2.6.32/amd64) of the
squeeze release.
I tested from different servers and each time made a wget of a 16 MB
file from a remote co-location which is connected with gigabit (but the
issue showed also on a 32MBit/s "dial-up" cable connec
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 12:30 +0200, Thorsten Giese wrote:
> Hello there,
>
> I think I found a performance issue in the kernel (2.6.32/amd64) of the
> squeeze release.
>
> I tested from different servers and each time made a wget of a 16 MB
> file from a remote co-location which is connected with
Am 31.08.2011 14:09, schrieb Ben Hutchings:
>> I think I found a performance issue in the kernel (2.6.32/amd64) of the
>> squeeze release.
>>
>> I tested from different servers and each time made a wget of a 16 MB
>> file from a remote co-location which is connected with gigabit (but the
>> issue s
Since Linux 3.x is a continuation of the 2.6.x series and not a major
change, there was no need to create a new source package for it.
However, we should now rename the source package to 'linux'.
Currently, most of our bugs are assigned to 'linux-2.6' or
'src:linux-2.6' so that version-tracking wo
Hi
On Wednesday 31 August 2011, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-08-12 at 21:55 +0200, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
> > On Friday 12 August 2011, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2011-08-01 at 19:36 -0300, Willian Gustavo Veiga wrote:
[...]
> > Given that the licensing for carl9170fw is a b
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 14:36 +0200, Thorsten Giese wrote:
> Am 31.08.2011 14:09, schrieb Ben Hutchings:
> >> I think I found a performance issue in the kernel (2.6.32/amd64) of the
> >> squeeze release.
> >>
> >> I tested from different servers and each time made a wget of a 16 MB
> >> file from a r
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 01:39:20PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Since Linux 3.x is a continuation of the 2.6.x series and not a major
> change, there was no need to create a new source package for it.
> However, we should now rename the source package to 'linux'.
>
> Currently, most of our bugs a
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 14:13 +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 01:39:20PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > Since Linux 3.x is a continuation of the 2.6.x series and not a major
> > change, there was no need to create a new source package for it.
> > However, we should now rename th
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 3.0.0-3
Severity: important
I was booting about 10 times on this kernel and didn't have this issues.
Also I had no problem with my hardware.
When I was in the middle of boot process, and when gdm3 just started
starting (Xorg already started, blanked screen, and showed
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.92o.20.200909212352
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Hi Maks,
We're including attached patch in Univention Corporate Server, a Debian derived
Distribution based on Stable.
Subjects says it all. Please consider merging.
Cheers,
Moritz
diff -aur initramfs-too
Hello Moritz,
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 03:58:27PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> We're including attached patch in Univention Corporate Server, a Debian
> derived Distribution based on Stable.
happy to do so if newer busybox no longer spits at one face on
invocation aka if that is resolved:
ht
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 3.0.0-3
Severity: wishlist
Hey,
this was already asked as part of #605090 but I had the impression that
opening a bug was needed since people were aware, but I was wrong.
So here's a wishlist bug. Could DEBUG_STRICT_USER_COPY_CHECKS be
enabled?
It's used to enforce c
On mer., 2011-02-23 at 13:36 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On mer., 2011-01-26 at 14:54 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > > >
> > http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/linux-grsec-base.git;a=summary
> > > if
> > > > > needed.
> > > > Why is this not part of the patch below?
> > > The grsec.conf
Ok, here's an updated patchset.
Tarball can be found at
http://molly.corsac.net/~corsac/debian/kernel-grsec/grsec-patches.tar.xz
(and already extracted in grsec-patches/ folder).
It's a folder with a quilt patche series
* 01_support-linux-3.0.patch
This is unrelated but needed to support linux3
reassign 639861 linux-2.6 3.0.0-1
kthxbye
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 01:58:59 +0100, cfr wrote:
> Package: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau
> Version: 1:0.0.16+git20110411+8378443-1+b1
> Severity: normal
>
>
> There is no control of the backlight with the nouveau drivers on a 12"
> Aluminium G4 PowerBoo
Tuesday, August 30, 2011 5:59 PM wzab wrote:
> I found this bug, when I was looking for solution for my problem related to
> the
> newest kernels and a machine based on D865GBF motherboard.
I have two i865 mobos D865GRH, D865PERLK that both have trouble booting 2.6.39
and 3.0.0 kernels
> I
The problem reappears with bittorrent downloading and laptop is frozen and
the clock drifts.
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Jose Luis Salas wrote:
> I used cpufrequtils 007-2 in both setups, and cpu scaling is working like a
> charm. I need jiffies in 2.6.32 for avoiding clock drift ( and free
Wednesday, August 31, 2011 1:22 PM Will Set wrote:
>
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=627019
> I have two i865 mobos D865GRH, D865PERLK that both have trouble booting
> 2.6.39
> and 3.0.0 kernels
> Yes
> Len Brown suggested workaround
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.
W dniu 27 sierpnia 2011 07:38 użytkownik Jonathan Nieder
napisał:
> So: did I guess correctly (i.e., was this fixed by 2.6.39)? :)
>
> What would actually be useful to know is the version number of some
> recent (e.g., 3.0.x) kernel that exhibits or does not exhibit the
> problem. Hopefully the l
Am 31.08.2011 14:48, schrieb Ben Hutchings:
> On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 14:36 +0200, Thorsten Giese wrote:
>> Am 31.08.2011 14:09, schrieb Ben Hutchings:
I think I found a performance issue in the kernel (2.6.32/amd64) of the
squeeze release.
I tested from different servers and each
Your message dated Wed, 31 Aug 2011 18:49:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#618261: fixed in linux-2.6 3.1.0~rc4-1~experimental.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #618261,
regarding linux-2.6: Please enable CONFIG_FB_UDL on all architectures
to be marked as done.
This means that you c
Your message dated Wed, 31 Aug 2011 18:49:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#627655: fixed in linux-2.6 3.1.0~rc4-1~experimental.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #627655,
regarding linux-image-2.6.39-1-686-pae: missing NFS4.1 / pNFS support
to be marked as done.
This means that you c
Your message dated Wed, 31 Aug 2011 18:49:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#638696: fixed in linux-2.6 3.1.0~rc4-1~experimental.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #638696,
regarding FTBFS on alpha; GPIO config is insane
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Wed, 31 Aug 2011 18:49:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#639113: fixed in linux-2.6 3.1.0~rc4-1~experimental.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #639113,
regarding linux-image-3.0.0-1-486: please enable various OLPC drivers
to be marked as done.
This means that you c
Your message dated Wed, 31 Aug 2011 18:49:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#639439: fixed in linux-2.6 3.1.0~rc4-1~experimental.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #639439,
regarding reportbug script fails on s390: no PCI bus
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Your message dated Wed, 31 Aug 2011 18:49:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#639538: fixed in linux-2.6 3.1.0~rc4-1~experimental.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #639538,
regarding de4x5 is obsolete
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Accepted:
linux-2.6_3.1.0~rc4-1~experimental.1.diff.gz
to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_3.1.0~rc4-1~experimental.1.diff.gz
linux-2.6_3.1.0~rc4-1~experimental.1.dsc
to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_3.1.0~rc4-1~experimental.1.dsc
linux-2.6_3.1.0~rc4.orig.tar.gz
to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_3.1.0~
On 29/08/11 04:44, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Nice. Have you found which item in the .config caused it?
Found it.
Issue comes from "CONFIG_LOCKUP_DETECTOR=y" (issue disappears when
unsetting it).
But why would this option/feature "locks-up" the system?
--
Thibault Manlay
signature.asc
Descr
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:08:30PM +0200, Thibault Manlay wrote:
> On 29/08/11 04:44, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> > Nice. Have you found which item in the .config caused it?
>
> Found it.
>
> Issue comes from "CONFIG_LOCKUP_DETECTOR=y" (issue disappears when
> unsetting it).
>
> But why would this
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 3.0.0-3
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
Kernel fails to boot on my V240 dual processor ultrasparc machine. It does not
boot at all. Last kernel known to work
is 2.6.39.
I join to the but report the output of the boot capture through the serial port.
-- Package-
On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 00:38 +0200, Sebastien Bernard wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 3.0.0-3
> Severity: important
>
> Dear Maintainer,
> Kernel fails to boot on my V240 dual processor ultrasparc machine. It does
> not boot at all. Last kernel known to work
> is 2.6.39.
>
> I join to the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 639949 + upstream
Bug #639949 [linux-2.6] linux-image-3.0.0-1-sparc64-smp: Kernel fails to boot
with illegal instruction on ultrasparc V240
Added tag(s) upstream.
> forwarded 639949 da...@davemloft.net
Bug #639949 [linux-2.6] linux-image-3.0
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 20:43 +0200, Thorsten Giese wrote:
> Am 31.08.2011 14:48, schrieb Ben Hutchings:
> > On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 14:36 +0200, Thorsten Giese wrote:
> >> Am 31.08.2011 14:09, schrieb Ben Hutchings:
> I think I found a performance issue in the kernel (2.6.32/amd64) of the
>
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 18:33 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> Ok, here's an updated patchset.
>
> Tarball can be found at
> http://molly.corsac.net/~corsac/debian/kernel-grsec/grsec-patches.tar.xz
> (and already extracted in grsec-patches/ folder).
>
> It's a folder with a quilt patche series
>
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 17:52 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 3.0.0-3
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Hey,
>
> this was already asked as part of #605090 but I had the impression that
> opening a bug was needed since people were aware, but I was wrong.
>
> So here's a wishl
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 15:45 +0200, Witold Baryluk wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 3.0.0-3
> Severity: important
>
> I was booting about 10 times on this kernel and didn't have this issues.
> Also I had no problem with my hardware.
>
> When I was in the middle of boot process, and when gdm3
On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 00:26 -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Ben Hutchings
> Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 04:45:34 +0100
>
> > So anyway, this CPU doesn't implement popc and is wrongly being detected
> > as doing so.
>
> I posted a fix for this already yesterday and it's in Linus's tree
> and queued
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 639949 + patch
Bug #639949 [linux-2.6] linux-image-3.0.0-1-sparc64-smp: Kernel fails to boot
with illegal instruction on ultrasparc V240
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
63
From: Ben Hutchings
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 04:45:34 +0100
> So anyway, this CPU doesn't implement popc and is wrongly being detected
> as doing so.
I posted a fix for this already yesterday and it's in Linus's tree
and queued up in Greg's -stable tree as well:
>From 1a8e0da5937a6c87807083baa318
On jeu., 2011-09-01 at 05:21 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> As I wrote on #605090:
>
> Without the strict check, the crap code produces a compile-time warning
> and a run-time warning and *no copying*. With the strict check, the
> crap code results in FTBFS (but only on i386 and s390!). So how is
49 matches
Mail list logo
