Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 669033 + pending
Bug #669033 [src:linux-2.6] linux-2.6: Enable EFI boot stub for x86 and x86-64
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
669033: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bug
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 642988 603066
Bug #642988 [linux-2.6] linux-headers packages in experimental are often
uninstallable
Bug #603066 [linux-2.6] Please always upload linux-kbuild-NNN at the same time
as linux-image-NNN
Severity set to 'grave' from 'wishl
Excerpts from owner's message of Tue Apr 24 18:57:04 -0700 2012:
> It's conceivable that a lid switch might fail in such a way as to cause
> an unwanted wakeup. But I would usually suspect a software bug (or a
> hardware quirk that should probably be worked around in software).
> Since we've now m
Your message dated Wed, 25 Apr 2012 02:53:40 +0100
with message-id <1335318820.4056.74.camel@deadeye>
and subject line Re: Bug#657060: linux-image-3.1.0-1-486: system sometimes
resumes shortly after suspending
has caused the Debian Bug report #657060,
regarding linux-image-3.1.0-1-486: system some
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 22:04 +0200, Rik Theys wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm experiencing the bug described in the Debian[1] and Red Hat[2] bug
> tracker.
>
> This bug seems to have been fixed in the 3.3 kernel with your commit
> 6926afd1925a54a13684ebe05987868890665e2b:
>
> From: Trond Myklebust
> Date
Excerpts from Ben Hutchings's message of Tue Jan 24 20:01:16 -0800 2012:
> I doubt it's going to make any difference, but could you please check
> whether this is fixed in the current version in unstable (3.2.1-2)?
> (You should install that anyway as it has an important security fix.)
Thanks and
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 13:35:13 -0700
Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:22:50PM +0200, Rik Theys wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm experiencing the following Red Hat bug[1] on RHEL and also on
> > Debian.
> >
> > I've noticed Fedora has started to ship an update with two patches
> > that reduce
Hi Giuseppe,
Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
> Is this really a medium error or a kernel bug?
Thanks. My first guess would be a medium error. Is this reproducible?
Curious,
Jonathan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
Package: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64
Version: 2.6.32-41
Hi,
today our backup did not complete successfully because of this error I
found with dmesg:
--
[16186645.419007] st0: Sense Key : Medium Error [deferred]
[16186645.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # fixed in mainline but not in stable@
> tags 659111 - fixed-upstream
Bug #659111 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Files on NFS4 become
unwritable, but OK after explicit stat
Removed tag(s) fixed-upstream.
>
End of message, stopping proces
Greg KH wrote:
> This patch seems to violate Documentatin/stable_kernel_rules.txt,
> doesn't it?
If I remember correctly, it's possible to get it to about 300 lines
with context by backing out the internal API change and keeping an
extra, ignored argument to decode_getfattr() and decode_getfattr_
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 09:06:01PM +0100, Adam Barratt wrote:
>Hi,
>
>6.0.5 is somewhat overdue now and I've been procrastinating over
>organising it for a while. So before I find something else to distract
>myself with, some suggested dates:
>
>May 5/6: Probably doable; would mean we need to clos
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 657078 -1
Bug #657078 [linux-2.6] linux-image-3.2.0-1-amd64: Support for new NFS id mapper
Bug 657078 cloned as bug 670321
> retitle 657078 nfs: page allocation failure in nfs_idmap_new
Bug #657078 [linux-2.6] linux-image-3.2.0-1-amd64: Supp
clone 657078 -1
retitle 657078 nfs: page allocation failure in nfs_idmap_new
severity 657078 important
tags 657078 + upstream patch
quit
Rik Theys wrote:
> I'm experiencing the following Red Hat bug[1] on RHEL and also on
> Debian.
>
> I've noticed Fedora has started to ship an update with two pa
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:04:50PM +0200, Rik Theys wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm experiencing the bug described in the Debian[1] and Red Hat[2] bug
> tracker.
>
> This bug seems to have been fixed in the 3.3 kernel with your commit
> 6926afd1925a54a13684ebe05987868890665e2b:
>
> From: Trond Myklebust
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:22:50PM +0200, Rik Theys wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm experiencing the following Red Hat bug[1] on RHEL and also on
> Debian.
>
> I've noticed Fedora has started to ship an update with two patches
> that reduce the footprint of the nfs4 id mapper which should prevent
> this (or
Hi Rik,
Rik Theys wrote:
> NFSv4: Further reduce the footprint of the idmapper
> commit 685f50f9188ac1e8244d0340a9d6ea36b6136cec
>
> NFSv4: Reduce the footprint of the idmapper
> commit d073e9b541e1ac3f52d72c3a153855d9a9ee3278
[...]
> Have these patches made it into the 3.3 and/or 3.4-rc kernels?
Hi,
I'm experiencing the following Red Hat bug[1] on RHEL and also on
Debian.
I've noticed Fedora has started to ship an update with two patches
that reduce the footprint of the nfs4 id mapper which should prevent
this (or seriously limit the chance).
NFSv4: Further reduce the footprint of the
Hi,
6.0.5 is somewhat overdue now and I've been procrastinating over
organising it for a while. So before I find something else to distract
myself with, some suggested dates:
May 5/6: Probably doable; would mean we need to close p-u-NEW over the
coming weekend.
May 12/13: York BSP. Probably no
Hi,
I'm experiencing the bug described in the Debian[1] and Red Hat[2] bug tracker.
This bug seems to have been fixed in the 3.3 kernel with your commit
6926afd1925a54a13684ebe05987868890665e2b:
From: Trond Myklebust
Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2012 13:22:46 -0500
Subject: NFSv4: Save the owner/group n
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 03:10:11PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 11:42 -0600, Jaimos F Skriletz wrote:
> > Package: linux-image-3.2.0-2-amd64
> > Version: 3.2.15-1
> >
> > I can confirm this bug in sid running kernel
> >
> > $ uname -a
> > Linux volticor 3.2.0-2-amd64 #1 SMP
Your message dated Tue, 24 Apr 2012 14:04:52 +0100
with message-id <1335272692.4056.60.camel@deadeye>
and subject line Re: Bug#649304: linux-image-3.1.0-1-686-pae:
needed for 686-pae kernels
has caused the Debian Bug report #649304,
regarding linux-image-2.6.39-2-686-pae: Kernel boots but OOPs fo
Your message dated Tue, 24 Apr 2012 14:04:52 +0100
with message-id <1335272692.4056.60.camel@deadeye>
and subject line Re: Bug#649304: linux-image-3.1.0-1-686-pae:
needed for 686-pae kernels
has caused the Debian Bug report #649304,
regarding linux-image-2.6.39-2-686-pae: Kernel boots, but dmesg
Your message dated Tue, 24 Apr 2012 14:04:52 +0100
with message-id <1335272692.4056.60.camel@deadeye>
and subject line Re: Bug#649304: linux-image-3.1.0-1-686-pae:
needed for 686-pae kernels
has caused the Debian Bug report #649304,
regarding linux-image-3.1.0-1-686-pae: needed for 686-pae
kern
3.2.15 fixed for me.
3.2.15 fixed for me.
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 3.2.15-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Please add the qmi_wwan driver from current (v3.4-rc)
mainline to the Debian linux-3.2 based kernels. This
is as simple as cherry-picking the commits listed below in
the listed order
27 matches
Mail list logo
