Bug#772627: linux: WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 344 at /build/linux-Y9HjRe/linux-3.16.7/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c:953 ironlake_crtc_disable+0x90/0x910 [i915]()

2014-12-09 Thread Simon Josefsson
Package: linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64 Version: 3.16.7-2 I bought a new Dell U2715H monitor (2560x1440) and ever since I've received the following kernel messages when I start X on boot. The machine is a Lenovo X201 laptop with (I believe) HD Graphics 3000. Freshly installed jessie beta2. I'm

Re: Bug#772624: dmesg output

2014-12-09 Thread Michael Biebl
Ben, any idea why this users mouse is not correctly detected during boot? Might this be a kernel problem? Martin, do you have a custom initramfs without hid-generic? If you don't have MODULES=most in /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf, could you rebuilt your initramfs with that option set? Am

Re: Bug#772624: dmesg output

2014-12-09 Thread Martin Vlk
I do have MODULES=most set in my /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf Now that you speak about this when I installed this Debian system (with beta netinst installer for testing) I was given option to either install generic or targeted kernel. I chose the targetted option, could this be causing

Re: Bug#772624: dmesg output

2014-12-09 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Martin Vlk mar...@vlkk.cz (2014-12-09): I do have MODULES=most set in my /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf Now that you speak about this when I installed this Debian system (with beta netinst installer for testing) I was given option to either install generic or targeted kernel. I chose

Re: Bug#772624: dmesg output

2014-12-09 Thread Martin Vlk
I updated /etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d/driver-policy to be: MODULES=most (it was MODULES=dep) and did: update-initramfs -u and restarted, but the problem still persists. 2014-12-09 13:07 GMT+01:00 Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org: Martin Vlk mar...@vlkk.cz (2014-12-09): I do have

Re: Bug#772624: dmesg output

2014-12-09 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 12:29 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: Ben, any idea why this users mouse is not correctly detected during boot? Might this be a kernel problem? Martin, do you have a custom initramfs without hid-generic? If you don't have MODULES=most in

Re: Bug#772624: dmesg output

2014-12-09 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk (2014-12-09): (As for the initramfs configuration, we really ought to add some comments to initramfs.conf about the other configuration files Probably a good idea. as I believe d-i *always* creates that overriding file.) base-installer.git's library.sh

Re: Bug#772624: dmesg output

2014-12-09 Thread Martin Vlk
To me it looks like the mouse device is recognized by (udev?) at boot - I can see that in the log, but for some reason it is not activated. When I then unplug it and plug back, it is both recognized and activated. See the log excerpts I sent earlier on. M. 2014-12-09 14:29 GMT+01:00 Ben

Re: Bug#772624: dmesg output

2014-12-09 Thread Martin Vlk
It was installed in expert mode, I forgot to say that before. 2014-12-09 14:35 GMT+01:00 Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk (2014-12-09): (As for the initramfs configuration, we really ought to add some comments to initramfs.conf about the other

Bug#771661: sample kernel strace

2014-12-09 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, the problem just re-occurred directly after booting the VM, even preventing me from logging in. I will raise the severity in a separate message: Process 28101 attached - interrupt to quit ppoll([{fd=15, events=POLLIN|POLLERR|POLLHUP}, {fd=13, events=POLLIN|POLLERR|POLLHUP}, {fd=24,

Bug#771661: machine is completely unusable

2014-12-09 Thread Toni Mueller
severity 771661 grave thanks Hi, I guess the same would apply to #771602, but I would like to not go the extra five miles to reproduce it there. In any case, a kernel that maxes out the CPU immediately after start while doing nothing is not entirely production quality (although I have very

Processed: machine is completely unusable

2014-12-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 771661 grave Bug #771661 [linux-image-3.16-0.bpo.3-686-pae] qemu-kvm: kernel crash on guest while pegged at 100% cpu Severity set to 'grave' from 'important' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. --

Processed: Re: Bug#771661: machine is completely unusable

2014-12-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: retitle -1 VM becomes unresponsive - soft lockup, RCU stall Bug #771661 [linux-image-3.16-0.bpo.3-686-pae] qemu-kvm: kernel crash on guest while pegged at 100% cpu Changed Bug title to 'VM becomes unresponsive - soft lockup, RCU stall' from 'qemu-kvm: kernel crash

Bug#771661: machine is completely unusable

2014-12-09 Thread Ben Hutchings
Control: retitle -1 VM becomes unresponsive - soft lockup, RCU stall Control: severity -1 important Control: reassign -1 src:linux Control: tag -1 moreinfo On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 14:53 +, Toni Mueller wrote: severity 771661 grave thanks Sorry, no, you've only seen one broken VM. Also,

Re: Bug#772624: dmesg output

2014-12-09 Thread Martin Vlk
​Just got a confirmation from my wife that she has the same issue on her laptop with identical Debian version, installed the same way. USB mouse is not functional after boot, or after wake up and she has to unplug and plug back to fix it. M.​

Processing of linux_3.16.7-ckt2-1~bpo70+1_multi.changes

2014-12-09 Thread Debian FTP Masters
linux_3.16.7-ckt2-1~bpo70+1_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: linux_3.16.7-ckt2-1~bpo70+1.dsc linux_3.16.7-ckt2-1~bpo70+1.debian.tar.xz linux-support-3.16.0-0.bpo.4_3.16.7-ckt2-1~bpo70+1_all.deb linux-doc-3.16_3.16.7-ckt2-1~bpo70+1_all.deb

linux_3.16.7-ckt2-1~bpo70+1_multi.changes ACCEPTED into wheezy-backports-backports-policy

2014-12-09 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 23:00:13 + Source: linux Binary: linux-source-3.16 linux-doc-3.16 linux-manual-3.16 linux-support-3.16.0-0.bpo.4 linux-libc-dev linux-headers-3.16.0-0.bpo.4-all

Processing of linux_3.2.63-2+deb7u2~bpo60+1_multi.changes

2014-12-09 Thread Debian FTP Masters
linux_3.2.63-2+deb7u2~bpo60+1_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: linux_3.2.63-2+deb7u2~bpo60+1.dsc linux_3.2.63-2+deb7u2~bpo60+1.debian.tar.xz linux-support-3.2.0-0.bpo.4_3.2.63-2+deb7u2~bpo60+1_all.deb linux-doc-3.2_3.2.63-2+deb7u2~bpo60+1_all.deb

Replacing aufs with overlayfs

2014-12-09 Thread Ben Hutchings
The overlayfs union filesystem was included in Linux 3.18. I am assuming that this will cover the needs of Debian live systems, so I've dropped aufs from the Debian packaging. This is currently for experimental only, but you can expect this change to appear in unstable shortly after the jessie

linux_3.2.63-2+deb7u2~bpo60+1_multi.changes ACCEPTED into squeeze-backports-backports-policy

2014-12-09 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 22:50:26 + Source: linux Binary: linux-source-3.2 linux-doc-3.2 linux-manual-3.2 linux-support-3.2.0-0.bpo.4 linux-libc-dev linux-headers-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-all linux-headers-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-all-alpha

Re: Replacing aufs with overlayfs

2014-12-09 Thread Daniel Baumann
On 12/09/14 20:55, Ben Hutchings wrote: I am assuming that this will cover the needs of Debian live systems, so I've dropped aufs from the Debian packaging. yes. you can expect this change to appear in unstable shortly after the jessie release. great, looking forward to that. -- Address:

Bug#771661: machine is completely unusable

2014-12-09 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi Ben, On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 06:11:09PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: Also, this is assigned to linux-image-3.16-0.bpo.3-686-pae but the screenshot you attached shows that package being newly installed. Therefore it is not the kernel you were running at the time you first saw this

Re: Replacing aufs with overlayfs

2014-12-09 Thread Ed Dixon
Wow that will be a major change! I will be testing live persistence here as soon as it is available! Thanks to both of you for your hard work in all of this! On Tue Dec 09 2014 at 1:54:21 PM Daniel Baumann daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net wrote: On 12/09/14 20:55, Ben Hutchings wrote: