Processing of linux_6.8.12-1~bpo12+1_source.changes

2024-07-01 Thread Debian FTP Masters
linux_6.8.12-1~bpo12+1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: linux_6.8.12-1~bpo12+1.dsc linux_6.8.12-1~bpo12+1.debian.tar.xz linux_6.8.12-1~bpo12+1_source.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

linux_6.8.12-1~bpo12+1_source.changes is NEW

2024-07-01 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Mapping bookworm-backports to stable-backports. binary:acpi-modules-6.8.12+bpo-686-di is NEW. binary:acpi-modules-6.8.12+bpo-686-pae-di is NEW. binary:affs-modules-6.8.12+bpo-4kc-malta-di is NEW. binary:affs-modules-6.8.12+bpo-5kc-malta-di is NEW. binary:affs-modules-6.8.12+bpo-loongson-3-di is NEW

Bug#1063161: Add amd_pmf module

2024-07-01 Thread Diederik de Haas
On Monday, 1 July 2024 17:17:46 CEST Nathan MALO wrote: > It seems to me that it is working as expected ! Awesome :-) signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#1063161: Add amd_pmf module

2024-07-01 Thread Nathan MALO
Hi all, I am getting back to you with updated info. I currently own a Framework AMD 13 laptop running Debian Bookworm. I've installed the new kernel from unstable. apt-cache policy linux-image-amd64 linux-image-amd64: Installed : 6.9.7-1 Candidate : 6.9.7-1 Version table : *** 6.9.7-1 100

Bug#1061321: marked as done (firmware-nonfree: Important changes coming up with upstream version 20230919)

2024-07-01 Thread Diederik de Haas
On Monday, 1 July 2024 09:17:43 CEST Diederik de Haas wrote: > On zondag 30 juni 2024 22:33:03 CEST you wrote: > > I don't know the details anymore, but I recently ran into an interesting > > problem though as the 'physical' firmware file was put in the atheros > > packages instead of a link to the

Bug#1061321: marked as done (firmware-nonfree: Important changes coming up with upstream version 20230919)

2024-07-01 Thread Diederik de Haas
On zondag 30 juni 2024 22:33:03 CEST you wrote: > I don't know the details anymore, but I recently ran into an interesting > problem though as the 'physical' firmware file was put in the atheros > packages instead of a link to the place of the qcom-soc package. Could be a > PEBKAC issue, but you mi