On Sat, 14 Jan 2023 16:12:47 +0100 Salvatore Bonaccorso
wrote:
> Hi Jakub,
>
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 01:24:16PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> > * Salvatore Bonaccorso , 2022-11-19 11:11:
> > > Given you were able to tackle the issue further, can you report
the
> > > issue to upstream
> >
> >
On Mon, 25 Oct 2021 18:00:16 -0400 Andres Salomon wrote:
>
>
> Now I'll try a 5.14 kernel backport (with the firmware from bullseye).
> If it STILL happens, then I'll try and get a patch upstream to detect
> this issue and reinit the hardware.
>
>
Just an update - shortly
On 11/15/21 3:22 AM, Diederik de Haas wrote:
Andres: You mentioned bullseye in your initial report, but it didn't have the
usual footer mentioning various program versions and I'm especially interested
in the kernel version. Could you mention that in subsequent reports (if any)?
The user in
On Sun, 17 Oct 2021 13:10:19 -0400 Andres Salomon wrote:
[...]
>
> I'm currently trying a newer Cypress firmware (from unstable), so
> we'll see if it also has the same crash.
>
Same thing with the firmware-brcm80211 20210818-1 in unstable.
Oct 17 12:49:58 wifi1 kernel: [ 14.0577
Package: firmware-brcm80211
Version: 20210315-3
Severity: normal
This bug is mostly for documentation purposes.
When running a raspberry pi 4b as an access point, after a random
period of time the on-chip firmware will crash and leave the wireless
driver (brcmfmac) unusable until the chip is
Package: firmware-brcm80211
Version: 20210315-3
Severity: important
Tags: security
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Security Team
A whole bunch of wifi (protocol-level) security flaws were published
here: https://www.fragattacks.com/
Cypress (AKA Infineon), who maintains some of the broadcom firmware
Package: firmware-brcm80211
Version: 20210208-3
Severity: important
The version of firmware-brcm80211 in bullseye (specifically 20201218-3)
works fine on my Rasperry Pi 4 board. However, the version in sid does
not. Specifically, the brcmfmac kernel driver fails to load with some
clock errors.
Package: linux-image-3.2.0-4-686-pae
Version: 3.2.51-1
Severity: normal
With the standard wheezy kernel, suspend fails:
[ 31.357482] PM: Syncing filesystems ... done.
[ 31.357913] PM: Preparing system for mem sleep
[ 31.424249] Freezing user space processes ... (elapsed 0.01 seconds) done.
BTW, the original download site for the firmware gives me a 404. I
snagged the 3.0 version from fedora:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/repo/pkgs/ipw2200-firmware/ipw2200-fw-3.0.tgz/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
I've been actively using the machine for 48 hrs now, with no network
problems. I think it's safe to say that the 3.0 works well with
ipw2200s, while 3.1 is buggy. Please consider downgrading the
firmware. Thanks!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Yes, CONFIG_GPIO_CS5535 is forced to 'Y' because the OLPC XO-1 power
management settings (CONFIG_OLPC_XO1_PM, CONFIG_OLPC_XO1_SCI, and a few
other related options) are boolean.
Making the PM code modular is the only way to fix this, but doing so
would be racy due to the various hooks that are
On Sat, 20 Apr 2013 16:07:47 +0100
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
Control: tag -1 patch
On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 22:07 -0700, Andres Salomon wrote:
Package: fb-modules-3.2.0-4-486-di
Version: 3.2.41-2
The OLPC XO-1.5 doesn't support VESA. It needs the viafb driver in
order
Package: fb-modules-3.2.0-4-486-di
Version: 3.2.41-2
The Geode LXFB driver used to be built into the Debian kernel. With
bug #686528, it was made modular, which makes things more difficult for
the XO-1 platform.
OLPC XO-1 doesn't support VESA, which means the lxfb driver is required
in order to
Package: fb-modules-3.2.0-4-486-di
Version: 3.2.41-2
The OLPC XO-1.5 doesn't support VESA. It needs the viafb driver in
order to get display output. Similar to #705780, please consider
including viafb.ko in the fb-modules udeb.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Sun, 02 Sep 2012 21:26:21 +0100
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
I'm cc'ing Andres because he's previously requested various Geode
config changes to support OLPC.
Thanks!
On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 22:38 +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
Package: src:linux
Version: 3.2.23-1
On Sat, 3 Sep 2011 09:14:39 -0500
Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Andres,
[...]
Ways forward:
- libasound2 could use Suggests: alsa-base. (Recommends would be
too strong because alsa-base has nontrivial dependencies itself and
it is not too unusual to use binaries
Package: linux-image-3.1.0-rc4-486
Version: 3.1.0~rc4-1~experimental.1
Severity: normal
During boot on an OLPC XO-1, I encounter the following problem. I
believe it's the statement BUG_ON(a-cpuid = NCAPINTS*32), though I'm
not staring at an exact copy of linux-2.6 source.
Boot device:
Package: linux-image-3.0.0-1-486
Version: 3.0.0-2
Severity: wishlist
OLPC support is partially enabled in this kernel, but a few drivers
that have gone upstream (or been reworked) are missing from the config.
Please consider enabling the following config options:
CONFIG_MFD_CS5535=m (used by
Oh, and the 3.1 kernel will be including the following new symbols as
well:
CONFIG_OLPC_XO1_PM=y
CONFIG_OLPC_XO1_RTC=y
CONFIG_OLPC_XO1_SCI=y
CONFIG_OLPC_XO15_SCI=y
It would be nice to have those in -486 as well. The -686-pae kernel
won't be used for OLPC, because PAE conflicts with it. So,
In theory, this should never happen; snd_card_create() takes an idx
that sets the order of cards, /etc/modprobe.d/alsa-base-blacklist.conf
blacklists snd-pcsp (so it should never be loaded!),
and /etc/modprobe.d/alsa-base.conf sets idx=-2 for snd_pcsp so that
it's not loaded as the first
Hi Ben,
Ack on everything below. Some comments are below.
On Sat, 17 Oct 2009 17:14:54 +0100
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
I've drafted a policy based on what I believe to be best practice.
Please comment - is anything wrong, or anything missing? I also left
some questions in
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 19:38:49 +
Berni Elbourn be...@elbournb.fsnet.co.uk wrote:
Andres Salomon wrote:
2. Severities
Many submitters believe that their bug meets one of the following
criteria for high severity. We interpret them as follows and will
downgrade as appropriate
Oh and just to let you know, it does say you guys are the
maintainers. :) Let me know if you need anything else.
~Matt
I'd be interested to know if this still occurs on 2.6.31.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
On Sun, 18 Oct 2009 09:20:28 +1030
Arthur Marsh arthur.ma...@internode.on.net wrote:
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.31-1~experimental.2
Severity: normal
I attempted to run extremetuxracer on this machine with radeon9200se
and radeon driver and received the following output:
How
On Thu, 8 Oct 2009 08:54:49 -0600
dann frazier da...@debian.org wrote:
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 08:17:30PM +1100, Jason White wrote:
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.31-1~experimental.1
Severity: normal
After upgrading to 2.6.31 from 2.6.30, I get the following, quite
frequently,
On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 23:33:45 -0500
Paul Logasa Bogen II p...@tamu.edu wrote:
After a semi-random period of normal operation (anywhere from a few
hours to a week) the machine will suddenly get a series of page
allocation errors followed by a series of soft lockup - CPU#[X]
stuck messages
On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 10:12:06 +0200
Patrick Schoenfeld schoenf...@debian.org wrote:
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 11:01:45PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
This sounds an awful lot like a firmware bug, as well (for which we
don't have the source code for).
Perhaps you could try downgrading
On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 10:33:21 +0200
Patrick Schoenfeld schoenf...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 04:31:17AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sun, 2009-09-13 at 22:21 +0200, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
Hi,
Bastian, would you mind *explaining* why you think its justified
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 23:44:00 +0200
Moritz Muehlenhoff j...@inutil.org wrote:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 05:53:24PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6.29-1-686
Version: 2.6.29-3
Hi,
On my x40, audio is now broken with 2.6.29-1-686. I believe that
this is a Debian
Package: linux-image-2.6.30-1-686
Version: 2.6.30-3
During boot, I see:
[1.347047] Linux agpgart interface v0.103
[1.366133] [drm] Initialized drm 1.1.0 20060810
[1.378704] i915 :00:02.0: power state changed by ACPI to D0
[1.378719] i915 :00:02.0: PCI INT A - GSI 16
Package: linux-image-2.6.29-1-686
Version: 2.6.29-3
Hi,
On my x40, audio is now broken with 2.6.29-1-686. I believe that this is a
Debian-specific regression, as a stock Linus kernel (tag v2.6.29) doesn't
have this problem. Some apps (ie, ones using gstreamer) simply refuse to run;
others
8854095ef36c80a4178bc2ea93fe80415019bc34 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andres Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 14:19:12 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] include mtd, jffs2, and ubifs modules
This adds support for mtd/jffs/ubifs when 'most' is selected. Note
that this doesn't fix 'dep'.
Signed-off
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.92l
Severity:
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
including it.
From d86b9926cba57a91abb7096c5f467d41cbfb4ebc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andres Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:02:17 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] add support for linux-2.6's deb-pkg
..via /etc/kernel
Signed-off-by: Andres Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
debian/changelog
includes framebuffer modules.
From c52b4d1346055c0c33c2474162585be7dde7c9dd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andres Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:31:24 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] include video (framebuffer, fbcon) modules
This adds support for video/fbcon when 'most' is selected.
Note
.
From 586f67264971f0b8432aa99c13c9e16f009a729f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andres Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 18:04:09 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] allow root=mtd0 to be used
skip root checks if ROOT doesn't start with /dev.
Signed-off-by: Andres Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED
). This patch fixes that by explicitly checking for something that
starts with a number.From 7651875d24f8e35bf4b601beef7b7a4e8b92ad9d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andres Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 17:56:22 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] fix redboot partition support
Fix buglet
Hi,
We can possibly distinguish between /etc/kernel/postinst.d getting called
from kernel-package context, and upstream debpkg context. debpkg calls
with the following:
test -d /etc/kernel/postinst.d run-parts --arg=$version
/etc/kernel/postinst.d
kernel-package's uses:
system
On Mon, 1 Sep 2008 15:58:15 +0200
maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 30 Aug 2008, Andres Salomon wrote:
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.92f
On OLPC machines, root is a nand device that is mounted as mtd0 (it
is neither a block device nor a char device
On Mon, 1 Sep 2008 17:37:28 +0200
maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 11:22:34AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
[...]
--- /usr//share/initramfs-tools/scripts/functions.orig
2008-09-01 11:14:11.0 -0400
+++ /usr//share/initramfs-tools/scripts/functions
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.92f
On OLPC machines, root is a nand device that is mounted as mtd0 (it is
neither a block device nor a char device). The arguments passed to the
kernel are ro root=mtd0 rootfstype=jffs2.
Unfortunately, attempting to use an initrd based upon initramfs-tools
On Tue, 8 Jul 2008 09:15:14 +0200
maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 10:09:43PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
[...]
I'm having serious trouble parsing what you're trying to say here.
Could you rephrase?
you never checked the rh kernel. they do a *lot* of
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 09:51:52 +0200
Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
These are the patches Andres made sent upstream:
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/936294
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/937056
If they don't make it to 2.6.26,
like a kludge
(specially the off-by-one thing).
Putting Andres Salomon on CC, as he probably knows about the reasons
this was added.
These are hardware workarounds; I would highly suggest waiting for this
stuff to go upstream first..
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Daniel Baumann wrote:
Sam Morris wrote:
Andreas is MIA? Or do I misunderstand?
Andres didn't say something about inclusion so far, only Kel. And Kel
has a bouncing email address.
Sorry, that's my fault; he has updated packages for me to sponsor, but I
just haven't had time.
Anyways, try
Sam Morris wrote:
On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 12:45 -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
Daniel Baumann wrote:
Sam Morris wrote:
Andreas is MIA? Or do I misunderstand?
Andres didn't say something about inclusion so far, only Kel. And Kel
has a bouncing email address.
Sorry, that's my fault; he has
Hi,
Here's a use case where having initramfs-tools unconditionally update
initramfs images is a bad thing (at the very least, violating the
principal of least surprise).
I had a machine that was had a poorly supported sata_mv chipset; dapper
nor sarge w/ 2.6.15/2.6.16 images would install onto
Hi,
I've made a new request for an additional kernel discussion list:
http://bugs.debian.org/358625
Part of the process involves other interested people following up to the
bug. So, can people who would like to see the additional list please
follow up to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and express their
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I would like to remove Sven Luther from the kernel team (that is, remove
his svn commit privileges, as well as remove him from the Uploaders
field of kernel packages), and remove him from the debian-kernel (and
debian-kernel-devel, when it is
Alright Sven, this is the last time I'm ever going to respond to you.
I've wasted enough time on this.
Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 04:23:11PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I would like to remove Sven Luther from the kernel
Jurij Smakov wrote:
Hi,
It is pretty obvious (to me, at least) that the need for the official
packaging policy for the out-of-tree kernel modules is long overdue. As
mentioned on the wiki page dedicated to it [0], the current situation is
a mess. I would like to call for a formal
On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 11:25 +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Le Mer 15 Mars 2006 03:01, Andres Salomon a écrit :
Hi,
I am going through the expulsion process to have Sven Luther removed
from the project. The process is outlined here:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/08
The DAM has accepted the request; please send seconds directly to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], cc'ing me as well.
For the people who seem to think that there are more constructive ways
of dealing w/ this issue rather than the expulsion process:
http://squishy.cc/svenl.txt
This is a lot from two weeks
Hi,
I am going through the expulsion process to have Sven Luther removed
from the project. The process is outlined here:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/08/msg5.html,
and I have already completed step 1.
Step #2 requires the support of some 15 developers. I am attempting
On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 21:01 -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
[...]
Sven has always been a nuisance to deal w/, but up until now I have not
considered this action. In the past two weeks, the following comments
made by him have changed my mind:
2006-03-07:
svenl jonas: i hope we never again meet
-package versioned build-dep.
+ * Drop gcc-4.0 build dep.
+
+ -- Andres Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 26 Sep 2005 00:22:34 -0400
+
linux-2.6 (2.6.12-6) unstable; urgency=high
[ Andres Salomon, Bastian Blank ]
--- linux-2.6-2.6.12.orig/debian/templates/control.source.in2005-09-26
00:58
Ok, looks like people seem to want python more; I'll start rewriting
my tools to be in python, and working on the common lib stuff.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 01:23:30AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
[...]
Preferences? Once we have a common language, we can have a common
library as well (ages ago, I wrote half a Kconfig parser in racc; that
seems like it'd be useful for all kinds of scripts, but I'm not going to
spend any
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 06:52:23AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 01:23:30AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
[...]
I'm rather disappointed by the lack of responses to this. I don't intend
to do any more infrastructure work on the kernel packages until we pick
something
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 03:47:34PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 07:53:18AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 06:52:23AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
I don't know anything about ruby.
Well, others are going to have to learn as well. As I said, I
On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 19:24 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 01:25:31PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
[...]
Alright, I think I'm a fan of #2. The module maintainers upload their
packages to sid, with the binary package module-source in there. We
have a package called
On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 19:36 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 01:34:22PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 19:24 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 01:25:31PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
[...]
Alright, I think I'm a fan of #2
On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 11:03 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Joey Hess wrote:
Now that 2.6.12 is finally in testing and work is well underway to
remove 2.6.8, I think we can switch to tracking security holes in the
new kernel now. There are several items listed as unfixed in 2.6.8, would
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 06:23:25PM -0700, Jurij Smakov wrote:
Hello,
As you probably know, the 2.6.13 kernel is out, and we are facing some
problems
with packaging it for Debian. A major change compared to 2.6.12 is the
discontinued support for devfs, which, I understand, renders current
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 11:16:38PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
Hello everyone,
I'm trying to detect a debian kernel from uname -r.
My suggestion would be to add a -debian at the end of the localversion
of kernels _patched_/modified by debian, and to leave the localversion
completely
a Kconfig parser in racc; that
seems like it'd be useful for all kinds of scripts, but I'm not going to
spend any more time on it until we decide whether I should continue in
racc, or use something python-y).
--
Andres Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
Unless anyone has objections, I intend to upload 2.6.12-6 tomorrow.
The only flavour that fails to oldconfig is arm/config.s3c2410; Vincent,
can you please fix that? The following shouldn't prompt:
cat debian/arch/config .config
cat debian/arch/arm/config.s3c2410 .config
make oldconfig
Ok, so now that we have dists/sid and dists/trunk (which is for development
and experimental stuff); how is this actually supposed to work? I understand
the scenario when we have 2.6.12 in sid and 2.6.13rc in trunk; stick
any new development stuff in trunk, backport to sid if desired, do sid
On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 22:25 +0900, Horms wrote:
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 08:51:06AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
Ok, so now that we have dists/sid and dists/trunk (which is for development
and experimental stuff); how is this actually supposed to work? I
understand
the scenario when we
On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 15:20 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 08:51:06AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
Ok, so now that we have dists/sid and dists/trunk (which is for development
and experimental stuff); how is this actually supposed to work? I
understand
the scenario
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 04:15:25AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
[...]
For other architectures, if there are any issues, let me know; otherwise
I'll build and upload 2.6.12-6 tomorrow.
http://people.debian.org/~dilinger/kernel/2.6.12-6/
Go nuts.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 11:28:51PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
[...]
Well, my idea is to try to host all those module package in the kernel
subversion tree (under modules), in such a way that we can trigger automated
or semi-automated uploads of them in case of kernel abi changes.
I assume
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 09:11:22PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
Hi folks
Are there any attempts to provide firmware images which are needed for
several hardware and not included in the kernel as packages?
Such as? I'm not aware of any firmware that's not included in the kernel
that we're
On Fri, 2005-09-02 at 08:59 +0900, Horms wrote:
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 02:58:30PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 07:35:25AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 12:30:41AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
[...]
Well, we have not decided, the first
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 09:45:18AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
[...]
First: this discussion is pointless and always ends in people promoting
their favorite toy (only).
Pretty much.
So how do you know they are reliable? For me, XFS began eating my files
after 1.5years of usage, and the
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 07:35:25AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 12:30:41AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
[...]
Well, we have not decided, the first [author] is thrown in by dch, and
people are still using the same format as always, and maybe not always remove
the [author
).
(Andres Salomon, Bastian Blank)
* powerpc-apus.patch:
Added preliminary apus patch, not applied though.
(Sven Luther)
* powerpc-pmac-sound-check.patch: Added.
(Sven Luther)
* [i386] Unset CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE in i386 config,
it breaks iproute's (and other netlink users
On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 15:33 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 05:41:34PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 05:53:38PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 05:53:41PM +0900, Horms wrote:
[...]
svk may
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 12:22:08PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 11:50:33AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
BTW, was 2.6.13 already released ? Or any idea when it will be ?
The mail arrived 2:17 MEST.
Also, i believe we need a 2.6.12-6 upload which fix the remaining
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 08:07:29PM +0530, Rachita Kothiyal wrote:
Hi
The following set of patches made on mkinitrd (from initrd-tools
package:version 0.1.82), would enable the integration of kdump with
Debian. For more details about the kexec based kdump solution please
refer to
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 05:53:41PM +0900, Horms wrote:
[...]
svk may be different, if so,
this is a excellent time to discuss that.
It just gets crazy if it can't find merge points.
Could you elaborate a little. I think you are the only one using
svk at
On Thu, 2005-08-18 at 18:51 +0900, Horms wrote:
[...]
Obviously the security team needs to be involved. However
CCing them on emails seems largely fruitless. Do you have
any ideas on how to work with them to make this release happen?
It is becoming quite frustrating to say the least.
My
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 12:02:31PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
[...]
Then is there any reason why SMART doesn't detect any problem
except some errors at power-on time? And why don't I get such
errors with a 2.6 kernel (though I haven't done much testing)
if it is not a problem with the 2.4
Hi,
Specifying --arch $(ARCH) unconditionally is what's breaking the sparc kernel
build (and it just seems like a bad idea). First, shouldn't we just specify
this if we're cross-compiling (ifneq ($(DEB_BUILD_ARCH),$(DEB_HOST_ARCH))) ?
Second, --arch's arg needs to match what include/asm points
severity 323143 wishlist
retitle 323143 linux-2.6: CONFIG_ATM_CLIP should be configured as a module
thanks
On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 05:08:18PM -0700, Alvaro Martinez Echevarria wrote:
Package: linux-source-2.6.12
Version: 2.6.12-1
Severity: normal
Hi,
Regarding this problem with iproute:
On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 02:13 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Tuesday 16 August 2005 19:35, Andres Salomon wrote:
[...]
This should probably be the case anyways, as it appears to be marked
EXPERIMENTAL, and the config does support tristate. Not only that, but
it's configured differently across
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 02:43:36PM -0700, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 02:22:33PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 09:23:52AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
This will break a lot packages depending on one of those, including but
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 07:21:06AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
[...]
Wrong, linux-2.6 needs at least version 9.005 of kernel-package. So either we
backport it to sarge, or i provide a patch of the needed functionality for the
version of kernel-package in sarge.
Is it just powerpc that needs
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 11:57:35AM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 05:34:33PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 11:29 +0200, Christian Hammers wrote:
Hello
The problems is not Dell PowerEdge specific. My TYAN Tiger-i7320-S5350
(standard dual xeon server
Hi,
So, was there any decision whether to provide 2.6.8+security in
volatile, or just backport linux-2.6 (2.6.12)? I need to do a 2.6.12
backport, so if people are wanting 2.6.12 for volatile, I'll do that;
however, if people want 2.6.8+security in volatile, I'll just put 2.6.12
in
reopen 315968
tags 315968 + sarge
thanks
I assume you meant to CC [EMAIL PROTECTED] :)
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 03:30:59PM +0900, Horms wrote:
reopen 315968
thanks
This bug is still valid for 2.6.8, so lets leave it here for now.
At the very least we can use it to coodinate known problems
For future reference, the original bug is #303311.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 03:52:33PM +0200, Max Vozeler wrote:
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.12-1
Severity: wishlist
There used to exist packages that depend on all -headers packages for a
particular arch (eg. kernel-headers-2.6.11-1-i386). This is very useful
for build-depends when
at unstable.
I guess we need an epoch
Give the man an epoch!
2.6.12-2 is re-tagged in svn, w/ some epoch spiffiness that waldi did;
only the transition packages (kernel-image-*) got epoch'd. We're both
building test packages.. Hopefully this should appease katie.
--
Andres Salomon [EMAIL
On Wed, 03 Aug 2005 19:55:12 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
Hi folks
linux-2.6 currently supports something called subarch. It should be
used for incompatible patches. This is needed for m68k and I think mips.
Problems with this
- mostly unimplemented,
- namingschema differs from anything
On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 18:10 -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 03:43:42PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
until fairly recently; we've gotten conflicting answers ranging from We
should provide kernel updates and the security team will use them
verbatim
generally the security
On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 13:54 -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 12:07:50PM +0900, Horms wrote:
Thanks, I wasn't aware of that. However it seems that
working with the security team on this is difficult -
lack of response being a primary issue.
What response do you want? I
On Mon, 01 Aug 2005 18:40:26 +0900, Horms wrote:
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 09:28:37AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Horms ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050801 08:23]:
I am wondering if others thing that volatile is a good
place for us to make uploads of updated 2.6.8 and 2.4.27 kerels for
Sarge?
On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:51:31 -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
- readdition of tg3 driver, as firmware license has been fixed
It's distributable, but only in non-free. No source code for the firmware
program. Sorry. :-P Ask debian-legal if you have further questions about
that.
Yep,
linux-2.6_2.6.12-1 just hit incoming, woo!
My definite goals for 2.6.12-2 are:
- differentiate between @longclass@ and @class@, as Frederik pointed out
that the @class@ in 2.6.12-1 was making the synopsis line too long.
This is already checked into svn; it's up to arch people to update
1 - 100 of 202 matches
Mail list logo
