, we can easily, without big
recompilation, produce new images with any of these kernels.
I know that trying to push these ideas is what landed me in the current
mess, but it is what makes the most sense, it is an elegant and clean
solution to all these and related problems, so i ask you to consi
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 08:31:00PM +0100, Paweł Krzywicki wrote:
> On Monday 28 May 2007 19:06, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> >
> > No, we are volunteers, who do this out of our free time and work.
> I know this ... But I am saying that you should not be concentrated on some
&g
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 06:11:29PM +0100, Paweł Krzywicki wrote:
> On Monday 28 May 2007 16:19, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> Hi !
> I'm not involved in your job at all, but I am a member of debian-kernel list
> because I like to read about : "What is new in this area ?"
tic
campaign to hurt me, i would have gone away running, and not sacrificed
so much of my time and work to debian.
And you ask me to be silent ?
Saddened,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 01:33:28PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070528 13:23]:
> > [...]
>
> Sven, this whole thread is about that your commit access to the kernel
This whole thread is about me being stopped from doing meaningful debian
technic
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 01:03:29PM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > > After some more pressure on IRC, your commit access has been restored.
> >
> > It is not enough, i want the suspension revoked, since it was a stupid
> > decision, which has achi
e, and in a shady and mysterious
way.
It is not acceptable that debian deals in mafioso politics, and the
DAMs, by knowingly hiding most of the evidence, have actively
participated in it.
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 12:28:16PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070528 12:14]:
> > On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 11:17:39AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 08:38:24AM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
> > > > I can u
speak
about it honestly and in the open.
Saddened,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
severity 426262 critical
thanks
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 05:51:40PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 05:00:10PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > The following patch is needed to include the wrapper in the mkvmlinuz
> > support files. Without this, the kernel is
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 05:51:40PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 05:00:10PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > The following patch is needed to include the wrapper in the mkvmlinuz
> > support files. Without this, the kernel is not bootable on hardware
&g
whole
system.
I tried to apply the attached patch directly to the kernel svn, but
someone removed me from the kernel team, in another act of agression
against me, so i am forced to attach it here.
Sad that even the kernel team is joining the witch hunt against me,
Sven Luther
-- System
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 08:00:30PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 06:32:00PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > This is a problem only in your new kernel-package less build
> > infrastructure, or something related to newer upstreams, or something
> > which w
nux
mkdir -p /tmp/blah
INSTALL mkvmlinuz support files
I guess this is the modpost line which is problematic, right ?
Bastian, if i understand this right, it worked previously, because the
mkvmlinuz_support_install call was done *AFTER* all the installation
happened, while you do it earlier ?
package around, and in fact, we strongly decourage to keep the
older packages around, and keeping them around should be considered RC
buggy.
Let's finish the work started with the unification of the kernel
packages after the sarge release, and drop all legacy/obsolete
requirements like this on
t;For now I only want to disable it."
in the message you quote.
This seems in complete opposition to what you claim he did say.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the sparc32 kernels are fixed, it will be time enough to
reactivate it.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
el
> in etch for r1 or r2 release.
Also, it would be good if for lenny we made fuller uses of the possibilities
offered by initramfs, especially the way you can concatenate various cpio
archives together to obtain a single ramdisk. This would be inmensely helpful
both for d-i and the non-free firmware issues.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ptable to me.
>
> What about pushing 2.6.21rc on sid?
This may be another solution, we drop 2.6.20, and upload 2.6.21-rcX kernels to
unstable until 2.6.21 is reached.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
xperimental.
Fine with me.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
endly,
Sven Luther
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-powerpc
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 03:47:29PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 12:33:07PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >> I agree that it's difficult to change any current tool to make this. I
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 12:33:07PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> What's the planned features for it?
> >
> > The idea is to parse the Kconfig, and generate a graph, which represents all
> > the Kconfig
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 10:27:55AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 08:58:45AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >>
> >> > What do you think about
el config tool stuff, as maks suggested, can
easily grow up to do what we need. My understanding is that it is written in
C, and maybe less easily experimentable as the planned ocaml tool, since ocaml
is a language very well adapted for parsers and graph manipulators, like what
would be needed here.
stopping us from uploading 2.6.20 to unstable now, right ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Mar 31, 2007 at 08:18:26PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070331 16:03]:
> > The ideal would have been a framework where we could build new kernels and
> > have it integrated within a few days only. I gave a speach about this at
> > FO
ly the kernel module .udebs from the rest of d-i, and have actual d-i
images which are daily built, and usable independently of the kernel used.
This is already the second release where such problems happen, so let's hope
that people get more reasonable about trying to solve this through t
project, or at least takes some
interest in it, and actually ask questions to the student to help him clarify
the issue.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
no real need
of hierarchies and strong order of control, this worked out well enough.
But it is sure, that in the recent days, i see mostly Bastian doing uploads,
and only a few active people, so things have changed indeed, and not for the
best.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 12:18:13PM +0200, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 09:15:55AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > > I do agree with this interpretation. I also think it's really sad that
> > > we have to invoke policy to regulate the use of the Upl
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 09:43:03AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 09:09:48AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > So, Frans has the right to speak here, while i have not ?
>
> Frans' message was on topic and useful, while you were basically
> telling him to sh
ndencies) to keep people out of Uploaders if they think/feel that
> they should be there.
So, will you try to expulse him too, like Frederik and Andres did to me ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 10:01:08AM +0200, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 07:21:54AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> >
> > Frans, you are not of the kernel team, and as you have played dirty tricks
> > in
> > these areas yourself, you are absolutely not qua
do frequent uploads because
> of their role in the project (e.g. the release manager).
Frans, you are not of the kernel team, and as you have played dirty tricks in
these areas yourself, you are absolutely not qualified to give your opinion
here.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSC
not be uploaders.
On the other hand, there should not be any upload without a full consensus of
all the team, but then with the disintegration of the kernel team which has
been happening since the non-free affair, this could be more problematic than
what it seems.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UN
to bring the kernel team
in a state like it was in fall 2005, when we reached the hights of fun,
cooperation and niceness ? If it really is my fault that it all degenerated
so, then i am very sorry and ask your forgiveness for it.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 06:06:13PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-11
> Severity: important
I build a d-i monolithic mini-iso with the current 2.6.20 snapshot, and the
problem is still present there.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 10:38:57AM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Thanks for the quick response, Sven.
>
> On Wed 2007-03-14 08:28:38 -0400, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > This is due to building on a powermac, wh
mac where rarely tested, and
not since the big ARCH=powerpc changes.
That said, it is true that the do_cmd needs a bit better error checking, the
whole stuff needs a full reimplementation post-etch anyway, since it can now
mostly just call the ARCH=powerpc new wrapper which does much of what
mkvmlin
e this
> setting on only the nvidia chipsets in time for etch. Should we instead tag
> this bug etch-ignore, and refer the iommu=soft workaround to the release
> notes?
Could this also be related to my #414580 problems ? Will try the iommu=soft
option now. Mmm, ...
No, iommu=soft doesn&#
0x20)
Mar 13 00:36:53 kernel: ata1.00: tag 0 cmd 0xc8 Emask 0x9 stat 0x51 err 0x40
(media error)
Mar 13 00:36:53 kernel: ata1: EH complete
The disk is ok, it was used fine on another board before we switched it.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers
subject in order to know how to act as RM, and then, even before
the vote finished, claimed he would not respect it.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Shell: /bin/sh link
merge 412639 412640
thanks
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 08:15:06AM +0100, marvin wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.18-3-prep
> Version: 2.6.18-3
> Severity: normal
>
>
> this kernel stops after the
>
> uncompressing linux
> booting linux ...
>
> lines.
>
> Machine is IBM 7248 / Carolina.
>
> I nee
On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 11:52:12AM +0100, David Härdeman wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 10:52:39AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> >Next step would be :
> >
> > 1) write a program writing to stdout and dropping the actual error message
> > somewhere.
>
> How abou
On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 11:11:45AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jan 26, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > 1) write a program writing to stdout and dropping the actual error message
> > somewhere.
> Just add something like this to the top of
rk on it, and see if the machine is stable with yaird and
without udev.
More to this once i have the box back, and am back from the Solution Linux
show in paris.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ing since yesterday, not sure if i missed dinstall or not
but supposedly they are two dinstall runs per day now, and if not, it will be
in the archive this evening. In the meantime, look at incoming for it.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
und the issue.
addnote is a chrp thingy, which was erroneously required for prep
installations, while mkprep is enough fro you.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ine 1205.
> dpkg: error processing linux-image-2.6.18-4-prep (--configure):
> subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2
>
>
> 2.6.18-3-prep worked fine here, the bug is new to -4-
Can you provide the output of
dpkg -L linux-image-2.6.18-4-prep |
rness and sense
from Anthony, though.
Anyway, it has been fun working with you all, i hope i see you in marsch.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 11:21:55AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 03:53:24PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 11:47:27AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 12:34:11AM +0100, Philippe COVAL wrote:
> > &g
n the kernel svn repo, under trunk/modules. Philippe is working on it
now, and i believe did check in a new version or something.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ave a report from an affected laptop that booting with noacpi
> solves the thermal issues?
Ah, neat, there is the noacpi option.
We could simply add this flag to affected laptops by d-i. No need to touch the
kernel or otherwise.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
of these patches by people *WHO DIDN'T
SEE THE SAME ISSUES* to make sure there is no regression.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
re to it, and i will present that at fosdem, but i hope this
already gave you all a taste of what could be, and that these ideas will not
be rejected out of hand, just because they come from me.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 11:50:40AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061222 05:42]:
> > On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 12:53:09PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> > > maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > >
th a
> Kernel that may damage hardware without even a notice in the release
> notes. If you are not able to fix it, note that you have provided a
> broken kernel.
Cool, let's delay etch a couple of weeks and move to a (now released) 2.6.19
kernel, to solve this issue.
Friendly,
S
would mean that we could provide a semi-official set of newer
kernels for etch. We would, once etch is released, provide a backportet kernel
of the new unstable kernel, as well as a etch-installing d-i for them.
This would allow users to install a stable etch, but including a newer kernel,
which is what probably most of us are doing anyway.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
your vendor to either exchange it
for a not broken one, or at least provide a bios upgrade which fixes the
brokeness.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
e shipped with Debian Installer rc1 is 2.6.17. Probably, the daily
> build installer already incorporates the 2.6.18 kernel.
It does indeed.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 06:26:57PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 09:35:56AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >> What architecture line are we talking about
tainer and kernel team, or you being part of the kernel
team, doesn't necessarily mean communicating via bug reports.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 05:17:45PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> found 401384 29
> thanks
>
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 11:17:03PM +, Sven Luther wrote:
> > mkvmlinuz (28) unstable; urgency=low
> > .
> >* Added support for 2.6.19 kernels.
> >* A
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 12:09:09PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > BTW, jonas, i notice also :
> >
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=403203
>
> Yes. I was slight
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 10:47:56AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 09:31:22AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Well, the real problem is that Manoj could be part of the kernel team,
> > > and t
On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 02:43:49PM -0600, Keith Parkansky wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> >On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 02:19:51AM -0600, Keith Parkansky wrote:
> >>FYI
> >>The new Debian Installer using the
> >>2.6.17 kernel does NOT fix the
> >>CD drive
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 12:30:28AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 22:50:04 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
>
> > Sven Luther wrote:
> >> Manoj's principal preocupacion is those user who build their own
> >>
r source packages.
> I'm not sure if it would be possible to binNMU / force rebuild of
> those, but since linux-modules-* are maintained by the kernel team
> and loop-aes by myself, I think we could react quickly and rebuild
> them via normal sourceful uploads as well.
Why is loo
Package: initramfs-tools
Severity: wishlist
Hi Maximilian.
The new efika board i am working with, need the pata_mpc52xx ide driver for
mounting the disk. This module is not included in the initramfs-tools most
target, which has as consequence, as you can imagine, that the kernel+ramdisk
won't bo
lpful.
Let's all have a kernel-team meeting somewhere post-etch, and try to work
together or something ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
source package, for example all bigmem flavors in a linux-bigmem
> source?
Plase don't, this would only complicate issues more for future security
builds.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Dec 10, 2006 at 10:39:45AM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Dec 2006, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > Package: initramfs-tools
> > Severity: critical
> > Justification: breaks the whole system
>
> hmm yes i know of that situation it af
ed to eject the CDROM i put in it to try to boot the
debian-installer in resuce mode :).
Friendly,
Sven Luther
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2
On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 12:43:06PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Dec 2006 11:36:30 +0100, Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 08:26:10PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> >> - What is stopping 2.6.18 to enter testing ? The PTS
On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 05:23:42PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 05:03:51PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Please don't drop the powerpc patches, they were all checkd and updated for
> > 2.6.19-rc6.
>
> Than fix the categories.
fix the categories
)
> - Any unused patch. (The output of debian/bin/check-patches.sh)
well, how many of those are not unused but where simply disabled when the
first 2.6.19-rcX builds were tried.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
y built as external
> > module.)
> >
> > Bastian
>
> ack for
> - modular-ide-pnp.patch
> never accepted upstream and ata is the way forward.
>
> - fbdev-radeon-noaccel.patch
> one of those ppc patches that don't get forwarded, why?
Huh, it h
t; module.)
Let's keep it for now, if i don't get it resubmitted before 2.6.20, we can
drop it.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 02:41:08AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 10:51:57AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > The -k7 issue, i don't know, can it be a flavour that was dropped or
> > something ?
>
> linux-latest-2.6 is not a candidate because
On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 11:36:30AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 08:26:10PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > - What is stopping 2.6.18 to enter testing ? The PTS says "Should ignore,
> > but forced by vorlon", so does this mean it will enter tes
tools, like it did for
initrd-tools ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 10:37:01AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061201 20:30]:
> > - What is stopping 2.6.18 to enter testing ? The PTS says "Should ignore,
> > but forced by vorlon", so does this mean it will enter testing today
times,
to load the fan control modules ? At worst, you can load the same modules as
is done in d-i.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ay give a light to the problem ? Manoj, can you have a look at
this, and maybe help us fix the issue ?
I guess those are the most important question, but anyone should feel free to
comment if they know something, or have a comment.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
comment on :
#397973: [powerpci/mac] partman-md appears to not write back the raid flag
to partitions.
Maybe it would be worth to raise the severity of this bug, but i can hardly do
this, or i will be seen as whiner who ups the severity of his pet bugs, can i
ask you to have a look at them ?
ave a hacked patch in our kernel with makes it
masquarade as a pci device, listening on the northbridge pci id, but when i
tried to push this patch upstream, i was told it was not needed because of the
platform device modalias support. There are probably other devices which
gained hotplug and t
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 09:17:09AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.17-2-686
> Version: 2.6.17-9
> Severity: important
Please try the 2.6.18-6 kernels currently in unstable. 2.6.18 is scheduled to
be the etch kernel.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
arts: executing /etc/kernel/postinst.d/mkvmlinuz
> /usr/sbin/mkvmlinuz: line 149: prep: command not found
>
> The line that is refered to looks like this:
>
> if dpkg --compare-versions $release ge 2.6.18 && "$arch" != "prep"; then
>
> as you can see th
On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 09:53:28AM +, Oleg Verych wrote:
> On 2006-11-16, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Hi, ...
> >
> > As you may know, or not, we are waiting for the abi-breaking 2.6.18-6 to be
> > uploaded for pushing the 2.6.18 kernel into etch.
> >
> > It s
On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 10:52:45PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 11:36:48PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > As you may know, or not, we are waiting for the abi-breaking 2.6.18-6 to be
> > uploaded for pushing the 2.6.18 kernel into etch.
>
> The ABI b
On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 10:20:09PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 06:32:54AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> >> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >>
On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 10:10:37AM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 09:48:21AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 09:20:52AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 01:41:17AM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wr
On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 08:23:34AM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> Moin,
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 11:36:48PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Hi, ...
> >
> > As you may know, or not, we are waiting for the abi-breaking 2.6.18-6 to be
> > uploaded for pushi
On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 06:32:54AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hi, ...
> >
> > As you may know, or not, we are waiting for the abi-breaking 2.6.18-6 to be
> > uploaded for pushing the 2.6.18 kernel int
On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 11:24:00PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-11-16 23:36]:
> > Is there any comment on this ? Anyone has any particular stuff they
> > would like included before -6 is released ?
>
> I should note that this
.
Is there any comment on this ? Anyone has any particular stuff they would like
included before -6 is released ? Or otherwise comments on this tentative
deadline ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ad the same
> problem.
Please try it with the new 2.6.18 kernels, which are scheduled for the etch
release, and should enter d-i soon.
There where some CD related fixes which where applied recently.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "u
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 09:11:35AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 05:23:56PM +0100, Sven Luther a écrit :
> > On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 12:38:44AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > > The code controlling fan speed on iMac G5 do not work correctly as a
ase provide us with an lsmod output of your running noisy system.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1 - 100 of 1956 matches
Mail list logo
