intrigeri wrote (31 May 2012 13:14:13 GMT) :
Looking back over the bug log, I see that wasn't requested, so I'm
only applying 'AppArmor: compatibility patch for v5 interface' now.
Unfortunately, the resulting kernel (linux-image-3.2.0-2-amd64
3.2.19-1), combined with the AppArmor userspace
Hi,
Ben Hutchings wrote (31 May 2012 03:24:09 GMT) :
What about this one:
commit 1023c7c2f9d9c5707147479104312c4c3d1a2c2b
Author: John Johansen john.johan...@canonical.com
Date: Wed Aug 10 22:02:39 2011 -0700
AppArmor: compatibility patch for v5 network controll
Hi all,
Its been 2 months without a reply on this issue, and we are getting
close to a freeze. Kees and John it looks like there are some pending
questions for you below, it would be great if you could chime in with
your opinons:
If the Debian kernel team was willing to carry some kind of
On 05/30/2012 08:08 AM, micah anderson wrote:
Hi all,
Its been 2 months without a reply on this issue, and we are getting
close to a freeze. Kees and John it looks like there are some pending
questions for you below, it would be great if you could chime in with
your opinons:
If the
On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 16:46 -0700, John Johansen wrote:
On 05/30/2012 08:08 AM, micah anderson wrote:
Hi all,
Its been 2 months without a reply on this issue, and we are getting
close to a freeze. Kees and John it looks like there are some pending
questions for you below, it would
On 05/30/2012 06:10 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 16:46 -0700, John Johansen wrote:
On 05/30/2012 08:08 AM, micah anderson wrote:
Hi all,
Its been 2 months without a reply on this issue, and we are getting
close to a freeze. Kees and John it looks like there are some
On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 20:00 -0700, John Johansen wrote:
On 05/30/2012 06:10 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
[...]
vs. the old compat patch
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jj/linux-apparmor
da1ce2265ebb70860b9c137a542e48b170e4606b
Kees, others, what do you think?
While I
Hi,
John Johansen wrote (13 Mar 2012 16:33:53 GMT) :
sorry I missed this,
Thank you, John, for your answers :)
yes you can pull them out of the tarball,
That would be 0002-AppArmor-compatibility-patch-for-v5-interface.patch
that can be found in the kernel-patches/$LATEST/ directory of the
On 03/14/2012 03:24 AM, intrigeri wrote:
Hi,
John Johansen wrote (13 Mar 2012 16:33:53 GMT) :
sorry I missed this,
Thank you, John, for your answers :)
yes you can pull them out of the tarball,
That would be 0002-AppArmor-compatibility-patch-for-v5-interface.patch
that can be found
Hi,
John Johansen wrote (14 Mar 2012 10:35:13 GMT) :
There are also a new set of patches available against the 3.3
kernel. The static parts of the interface have been updated and
pushed into the 3.4 kernel. And the goal is to get the other part
into the 3.5 kernel (still a wip).
John: I
On 02/24/2012 08:40 AM, intrigeri wrote:
Ben Hutchings wrote (24 Feb 2012 16:06:16 GMT) :
Where can I find the patch?
Kees and Ubuntu AppArmor developers: can you please confirm the
patches that the Debian kernel team should consider for supporting the
AppArmor legacy interface would be the
11 matches
Mail list logo
