intrigeri wrote (31 May 2012 13:14:13 GMT) :
>> Looking back over the bug log, I see that wasn't requested, so I'm
>> only applying 'AppArmor: compatibility patch for v5 interface' now.
Unfortunately, the resulting kernel (linux-image-3.2.0-2-amd64
3.2.19-1), combined with the AppArmor userspace t
Hi,
Ben Hutchings wrote (31 May 2012 03:24:09 GMT) :
>> > What about this one:
>> >
>> > commit 1023c7c2f9d9c5707147479104312c4c3d1a2c2b
>> > Author: John Johansen
>> > Date: Wed Aug 10 22:02:39 2011 -0700
>> >
>> > AppArmor: compatibility patch for v5 network controll
>> >
>> >
On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 20:00 -0700, John Johansen wrote:
> On 05/30/2012 06:10 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
[...]
> >> vs. the old compat patch
> >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jj/linux-apparmor
> >> da1ce2265ebb70860b9c137a542e48b170e4606b
> >>
> Kees, others, what do you think?
On 05/30/2012 06:10 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 16:46 -0700, John Johansen wrote:
>> On 05/30/2012 08:08 AM, micah anderson wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Its been 2 months without a reply on this issue, and we are getting
>>> close to a freeze. Kees and John it looks like ther
On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 16:46 -0700, John Johansen wrote:
> On 05/30/2012 08:08 AM, micah anderson wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Its been 2 months without a reply on this issue, and we are getting
> > close to a freeze. Kees and John it looks like there are some pending
> > questions for you below
On 05/30/2012 08:08 AM, micah anderson wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Its been 2 months without a reply on this issue, and we are getting
> close to a freeze. Kees and John it looks like there are some pending
> questions for you below, it would be great if you could chime in with
> your opinons:
>
>> I
Hi all,
Its been 2 months without a reply on this issue, and we are getting
close to a freeze. Kees and John it looks like there are some pending
questions for you below, it would be great if you could chime in with
your opinons:
>If the Debian kernel team was willing to carry some kind of AppAr
Hi,
John Johansen wrote (14 Mar 2012 10:35:13 GMT) :
>>> There are also a new set of patches available against the 3.3
>>> kernel. The static parts of the interface have been updated and
>>> pushed into the 3.4 kernel. And the goal is to get the other part
>>> into the 3.5 kernel (still a wip).
>
On 03/14/2012 03:24 AM, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> John Johansen wrote (13 Mar 2012 16:33:53 GMT) :
>> sorry I missed this,
>
> Thank you, John, for your answers :)
>
>> yes you can pull them out of the tarball,
>
> That would be 0002-AppArmor-compatibility-patch-for-v5-interface.patch
> that c
Hi,
John Johansen wrote (13 Mar 2012 16:33:53 GMT) :
> sorry I missed this,
Thank you, John, for your answers :)
> yes you can pull them out of the tarball,
That would be 0002-AppArmor-compatibility-patch-for-v5-interface.patch
that can be found in the kernel-patches/$LATEST/ directory of the
a
On 02/24/2012 08:40 AM, intrigeri wrote:
> Ben Hutchings wrote (24 Feb 2012 16:06:16 GMT) :
>> Where can I find the patch?
>
> Kees and Ubuntu AppArmor developers: can you please confirm the
> patches that the Debian kernel team should consider for supporting the
> AppArmor "legacy interface" woul
11 matches
Mail list logo
