On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 15:37 +0900, Horms wrote:
> I have made my proposed packages for testing-security
> and testing-proposed-updates available as follows.
> I'd like to make the latter available in unstable as well.
> Neither contain the ABI change in question. I can add
> that to the testing-pro
Hi,
after some discusson, most of which can be found at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2005/05/msg00164.html
I have prepared proposed security updates for Sarge,
which Steve Langasek tells me he would really like to be available
the day sarge is released.
I have source, i386 and powerpc
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 07:29:51PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 11:08:29AM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 12:15:20PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 12:38:20PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 2005-05-14 at 11:33 +0900,
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 11:08:29AM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 12:15:20PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 12:38:20PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2005-05-14 at 11:33 +0900, Horms wrote:
> > > > I am not planing to include the CAN-2005-0449 fix
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 12:15:20PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 12:38:20PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > On Sat, 2005-05-14 at 11:33 +0900, Horms wrote:
> > > I am not planing to include the CAN-2005-0449 fix in the security or r1
> > > update as I undersdand that ABI cha
On Sat, 2005-05-14 at 11:33 +0900, Horms wrote:
> I am not planing to include the CAN-2005-0449 fix in the security or r1
> update as I undersdand that ABI changes are highly problematic. I am
> willing to be convinced otherwise.
>
Oh, do ABI changes in packages on security.debian.org break d-i a
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 12:38:20PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-05-14 at 11:33 +0900, Horms wrote:
> > I am not planing to include the CAN-2005-0449 fix in the security or r1
> > update as I undersdand that ABI changes are highly problematic. I am
> > willing to be convinced otherwise.
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 10:14:55AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 11:53 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > dann frazier wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2005-05-12 at 10:50 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > > > Horms wrote:
> > > > > ia64: version in Sarge: 2.6.8-12
> > > > >
> > > > > http://svn.d
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 09:57:53AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 18:33 +0900, Horms wrote:
> > In the case of the ia64-ptrace fix,
> > I am not sure if this code is needed by subsequent security fixes
> > or not.
>
> I needed that to form a baseline to backport the fix fo
On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 11:53 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> dann frazier wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-05-12 at 10:50 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > > Horms wrote:
> > > > ia64: version in Sarge: 2.6.8-12
> > > >
> > > > http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/kernel/trunk/kernel/ia64/kernel-image-2.6.8-ia64-2.6.8/debian
On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 18:33 +0900, Horms wrote:
> In the case of the ia64-ptrace fix,
> I am not sure if this code is needed by subsequent security fixes
> or not.
I needed that to form a baseline to backport the fix for CAN-2005-0136.
The previous baseline had incompatible changes in ivt.S.
dann frazier wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-05-12 at 10:50 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Horms wrote:
> > > ia64: version in Sarge: 2.6.8-12
> > >
> > > http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/kernel/trunk/kernel/ia64/kernel-image-2.6.8-ia64-2.6.8/debian/changelog?op=file&rev=0&sc=0
> >
> > Will -14 will be an ABI c
Hi,
I have been working on this update issue and I am happy to report that
I have made good progress.
Firstly, to clarify, I am working on two sets of updates.
A testing-security update, which will only include security fixes.
And a testing-proposed-updates, which will include some other fixes as
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 10:50:59AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Horms wrote:
> > ia64: version in Sarge: 2.6.8-12
> >
> > http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/kernel/trunk/kernel/ia64/kernel-image-2.6.8-ia64-2.6.8/debian/changelog?op=file&rev=0&sc=0
>
> Will -14 will be an ABI change from -12 or not?
>
>
On Thu, 2005-05-12 at 10:50 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Horms wrote:
> > ia64: version in Sarge: 2.6.8-12
> >
> > http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/kernel/trunk/kernel/ia64/kernel-image-2.6.8-ia64-2.6.8/debian/changelog?op=file&rev=0&sc=0
>
> Will -14 will be an ABI change from -12 or not?
Yes, it sh
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 03:08:51PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> Steve Langasek asked me to get in contact with you in regards
> to kernel security updates for sarge. I am happy to report
> that I and other members of the kernel team have been keeping
> the kernel-source for both 2.4.27 and
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 10:50:59AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
>
> > m68k: version in Sarge: 2.6.8-12
> >
> > http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/kernel/trunk/kernel/m68k/kernel-image-2.6.8-m68k-2.6.8/debian/changelog?op=file&rev=0&sc=0
>
> Since svn has version -1, it's hard to tell. However AFAIK nothi
Horms wrote:
> ia64: version in Sarge: 2.6.8-12
>
> http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/kernel/trunk/kernel/ia64/kernel-image-2.6.8-ia64-2.6.8/debian/changelog?op=file&rev=0&sc=0
Will -14 will be an ABI change from -12 or not?
> m68k: version in Sarge: 2.6.8-12
>
> http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/ker
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 11:40:47AM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> [snip]
> > > > It would make little sense to do separate uploads for them.
> > >
> > > It is nevertheless necessary, according to the security team's historical
> > > policy on security uploads. You can upload w
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 11:27:33AM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Horms wrote:
> > On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 10:07:06AM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > > Horms wrote:
> > > [snip]
> > > > For reference, these are the architectues that I believe
> > > > the kernel team handles, and the version of the k
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 02:21:16AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 11:07:45AM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > Steve Langasek wrote:
> > [snip]
> > > > mips/mipsel has four additional changes which should go in sarge:
> > > > - Fix broken ptrace
> > > > - Fix Cobalt PCI bridge
Sven Luther wrote:
[snip]
> > > It would make little sense to do separate uploads for them.
> >
> > It is nevertheless necessary, according to the security team's historical
> > policy on security uploads. You can upload whatever you want to
> > testing-proposed-updates, *right now*, but it doesn
Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 11:07:45AM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > Steve Langasek wrote:
> > [snip]
> > > > mips/mipsel has four additional changes which should go in sarge:
> > > > - Fix broken ptrace
> > > > - Fix Cobalt PCI bridge initialisation
> > > > - Work around cras
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 02:21:16AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 11:07:45AM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > Steve Langasek wrote:
> > [snip]
> > > > mips/mipsel has four additional changes which should go in sarge:
> > > > - Fix broken ptrace
> > > > - Fix Cobalt PCI bridge
Horms wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 10:07:06AM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > Horms wrote:
> > [snip]
> > > For reference, these are the architectues that I believe
> > > the kernel team handles, and the version of the kernel source
> > > they are using in Sarge:
> > >
> > > Ba
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 11:07:45AM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> [snip]
> > > mips/mipsel has four additional changes which should go in sarge:
> > > - Fix broken ptrace
> > > - Fix Cobalt PCI bridge initialisation
> > > - Work around crashes on Cobalt under I/O load
> > > -
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 06:00:15PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > > > Base kernel source version of package in Sarge
> > > > 2.4.27: alpha kernel-tree-2.4.27-9 (seems to be out of date in
> > > > SVN)
> > > > hppa kernel-tree-2.4.27-8
> > > > i386 kernel
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 09:43:01AM +0300, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
> Horms wrote:
> [snip]
> > For reference, these are the architectues that I believe
> > the kernel team handles, and the version of the kernel source
> > they are using in Sarge:
> >
> > Base kernel source version of
Steve Langasek wrote:
[snip]
> > mips/mipsel has four additional changes which should go in sarge:
> > - Fix broken ptrace
> > - Fix Cobalt PCI bridge initialisation
> > - Work around crashes on Cobalt under I/O load
> > - Fix crash on startup on serial-less Cobalts
>
> All of which seem to be out
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 01:27:55AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 10:07:06AM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > Horms wrote:
> > [snip]
> > > For reference, these are the architectues that I believe
> > > the kernel team handles, and the version of the kernel source
> > > they
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 10:07:06AM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Horms wrote:
> [snip]
> > For reference, these are the architectues that I believe
> > the kernel team handles, and the version of the kernel source
> > they are using in Sarge:
> >
> > Base kernel source version of p
in regards
> > > to kernel security updates for sarge. I am happy to report
> > > that I and other members of the kernel team have been keeping
> > > the kernel-source for both 2.4.27 and 2.6.8 up to date in SVN.
> > > And as of yesterday afternoon I have no out
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 10:07:06AM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Horms wrote:
> [snip]
> > For reference, these are the architectues that I believe
> > the kernel team handles, and the version of the kernel source
> > they are using in Sarge:
> > Base kernel source version of packa
Horms wrote:
[snip]
> For reference, these are the architectues that I believe
> the kernel team handles, and the version of the kernel source
> they are using in Sarge:
>
> Base kernel source version of package in Sarge
> 2.4.27: alpha kernel-tree-2.4.27-9 (seems to be out
Horms wrote:
[snip]
> For reference, these are the architectues that I believe
> the kernel team handles, and the version of the kernel source
> they are using in Sarge:
>
> Base kernel source version of package in Sarge
> 2.4.27: alpha kernel-tree-2.4.27-9 (seems to be out
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 04:04:22PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 03:08:51PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > Hi Martin,
> >
> > Steve Langasek asked me to get in contact with you in regards
> > to kernel security updates for sarge. I am happy to report
> >
* Horms wrote:
> 2.4.27: alpha kernel-tree-2.4.27-9 (seems to be out of date
>in SVN)
I'm going to upload kernel-image-2.4.27-alpha 2.4.27-9 next weekend,
built against kernel-tree-2.4.27-8, because 2.4.27-8 made it into
testing by mistake.
I'm
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 03:08:51PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> Steve Langasek asked me to get in contact with you in regards
> to kernel security updates for sarge. I am happy to report
> that I and other members of the kernel team have been keeping
> the kernel-sour
Hi Martin,
Steve Langasek asked me to get in contact with you in regards
to kernel security updates for sarge. I am happy to report
that I and other members of the kernel team have been keeping
the kernel-source for both 2.4.27 and 2.6.8 up to date in SVN.
And as of yesterday afternoon I have no
39 matches
Mail list logo
