Hi Debian Kernel Team,
intrigeri (2014-12-11):
> Ben Hutchings wrote (09 Dec 2014 19:55:10 GMT) :
>> Please try the Linux 3.18 packages from experimental (they're not there
>> yet, but should be soon) and check that overlayfs does what you need.
>
> Thanks. I'll test it for Tails' usecases (that u
Hi,
maximilian attems wrote (12 Mar 2015 20:52:04 GMT) :
> Apparmor is not critical, hence it is not a regression blocker.
Sure, I didn't expect this to be a blocker. Thanks, anyway, for making
it clear :)
> Better check how it affects Selinux while you'd care about security!
Sorry, I have no e
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 03:57:21PM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
>
> [dropping -live@ from the Cc list, as this is not specific to Live
> systems, and affects e.g. some setups based on Linux containers.]
>
> Ben Hutchings wrote (09 Dec 2014 19:55:10 GMT) :
> > Please try the Linux 3.18 packages from ex
Hi Ben,
[dropping -live@ from the Cc list, as this is not specific to Live
systems, and affects e.g. some setups based on Linux containers.]
Ben Hutchings wrote (09 Dec 2014 19:55:10 GMT) :
> Please try the Linux 3.18 packages from experimental (they're not there
> yet, but should be soon) and ch
Hi,
Ben Hutchings wrote (21 Dec 2014 23:20:15 GMT) :
> On Sun, 2014-12-21 at 21:53 +0100, intrigeri wrote:
>> 1. Due to overlayfs' stack depth limit of 2, until support more than
>>one read-only lower layer is completed, overlayfs breaks
>>live-boot's SquashFS stacking feature; Tails "auto
On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 09:53:24PM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
>
> Is it an option to get aufs back into the Debian kernel until #1 is
> completed and reaches mainline? (I could understand that you want to
> add a deadline if you make such a promise, of course :)
no, there is no rush for the upcoming
On Sun, 2014-12-21 at 21:53 +0100, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> intrigeri wrote (11 Dec 2014 13:13:43 GMT) :
> > Ben Hutchings wrote (09 Dec 2014 19:55:10 GMT) :
> >> Please try the Linux 3.18 packages from experimental (they're not there
> >> yet, but should be soon) and check that overlayfs does w
Hi,
intrigeri wrote (11 Dec 2014 13:13:43 GMT) :
> Ben Hutchings wrote (09 Dec 2014 19:55:10 GMT) :
>> Please try the Linux 3.18 packages from experimental (they're not there
>> yet, but should be soon) and check that overlayfs does what you need.
> Thanks. I'll test it for Tails' usecases (that
On 11 December 2014 at 14:13, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ben Hutchings wrote (09 Dec 2014 19:55:10 GMT) :
>> Please try the Linux 3.18 packages from experimental (they're not there
>> yet, but should be soon) and check that overlayfs does what you need.
>
> Thanks. I'll test it for Tails' usecases
Hi,
Ben Hutchings wrote (09 Dec 2014 19:55:10 GMT) :
> Please try the Linux 3.18 packages from experimental (they're not there
> yet, but should be soon) and check that overlayfs does what you need.
Thanks. I'll test it for Tails' usecases (that use aufs a bit more
than most other live systems, e
Wow that will be a major change! I will be testing live persistence here as
soon as it is available! Thanks to both of you for your hard work in all of
this!
On Tue Dec 09 2014 at 1:54:21 PM Daniel Baumann <
daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net> wrote:
> On 12/09/14 20:55, Ben Hutchings wrote
On 12/09/14 20:55, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> I am assuming that this will cover the needs of Debian live systems, so I've
> dropped aufs from the Debian packaging.
yes.
> you can expect this change to appear in unstable
> shortly after the jessie release.
great, looking forward to that.
--
Addres
The overlayfs union filesystem was included in Linux 3.18. I am
assuming that this will cover the needs of Debian live systems, so I've
dropped aufs from the Debian packaging. This is currently for
experimental only, but you can expect this change to appear in unstable
shortly after the jessie re
13 matches
Mail list logo
