Note: I am not filing this as a bug for reasons of responsible
disclosure. Maybe I am just being too paranoid. Let me know if
I should file the bug, or just forward my mail...
Package: kernel-source-2.6.11
Version: 2.6.11-5
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Note that the flags are correctly manipula
also sprach martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.06.09.1106 +0200]:
> Note: I am not filing this as a bug for reasons of responsible
> disclosure. Maybe I am just being too paranoid. Let me know if
> I should file the bug, or just forward my mail...
Ha! I am a dork. So I guess it's now full-d
Just curious, what does bit 8 (SYS_SETPCAP) means? Why is it off? Does it have
anything to do with your bug?
--
[]s,
Massa
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
also sprach Humberto Massa Guimarães <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.06.09.1718
+0200]:
> Just curious, what does bit 8 (SYS_SETPCAP) means? Why is it off?
> Does it have anything to do with your bug?
On all the machines I've tested, this bit was always off right after
boot. SETPCAP deals with process
On Thu, 9 Jun 2005, martin f krafft wrote:
Note: I am not filing this as a bug for reasons of responsible
disclosure. Maybe I am just being too paranoid. Let me know if
I should file the bug, or just forward my mail...
Hi Martin,
In order for the capability stuff to function the capability.ko
also sprach Jurij Smakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.06.10.0258 +0200]:
> In order for the capability stuff to function the capability.ko
> module should be loaded. The situation you describe indeed occurs
> when capability.ko is not loaded into the kernel. So I would say
> that this is lcap bug, as
6 matches
Mail list logo
