Re: ATT source licence?

2000-03-04 Thread Joey Hess
Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: I agree it is for the non-free archive. But does anyone see a larger problem, which would prevent it to get into Debian? The non-free archive is not part of Debian. -- see shy jo

Is this good enough for non-free?

2000-03-04 Thread Tommi Virtanen
Hi. I suck at legalese, even with my native language and local laws. This is not free in any case, but can it be included in non-free? Please Cc: me, I'm not subscribed. © COPYRIGHT CERN 1997-98 The copyright and all other rights related to this computer software,

Re: ATT source licence?

2000-03-04 Thread David Starner
On Fri, Mar 03, 2000 at 04:00:21PM +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: On Sat 3 March 2000, at 15 h 52, the keyboard of Henning Makholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: interested in is under this licence. Does anyone know it? It seems clearly non-free, but not too much non-free :-} We