> On Fri, 3 Dec 2004, Raul Miller wrote:
> > If I ship some product in three parts, such that the combination of those
> > three parts is consistently assembled and used, then I'm distributing
> > that product.
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 02:36:42PM -0800, Ken Arromdee wrote:
> Says who?
That was me
Ken Arromdee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 3 Dec 2004, Raul Miller wrote:
>> If I ship some product in three parts, such that the combination of those
>> three parts is consistently assembled and used, then I'm distributing
>> that product.
>
> Says who?
>
> Shipping parts can be different
On Fri, 3 Dec 2004, Raul Miller wrote:
> If I ship some product in three parts, such that the combination of those
> three parts is consistently assembled and used, then I'm distributing
> that product.
Says who?
Shipping parts can be different from shipping a combination if for some reason
you a
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 01:45:33PM -0500, Evan Prodromou wrote:
> > All this is stunningly irrelevant though, given that Austria is a
> > member of the EU these days, and this law is a blatant breach of
> > Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
>
> Yeah, whatever. Blah blah blah.
Die von Ihnen an [EMAIL PROTECTED] versandte Mail mit dem Betreff " Oh God
it's" enthielt einen Virus: ( Worm.Sober.I)
Die Mail wurde auf dem Mail-Server gelöscht und NICHT ausgeliefert! Bitte
prüfen Sie Ihr System mit einem geeigeneten AntiVirus Scanner.
Your mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with s
Die von Ihnen an [EMAIL PROTECTED] versandte Mail mit dem Betreff " Oh God
it's" enthielt einen Virus: ( Worm.Sober.I)
Die Mail wurde auf dem Mail-Server gelöscht und NICHT ausgeliefert! Bitte
prüfen Sie Ihr System mit einem geeigeneten AntiVirus Scanner.
Your mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with s
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 01:45:33PM -0500, Evan Prodromou wrote:
> I don't think it's feasible for us to create separate non-at, non-cn,
> non-za, etc. package repositories. It'd just be ridiculous for users in
> one country to assemble a sources.list from lists of packages that may
> or may not be
On Fri, 2004-03-12 at 17:05 +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> The whole reason why
> we have armies is to protect us from these oppresive powers. Therefore
> there's no reason to think they are somehow a threat to the project.
Yes. One of the reasons we have hundreds of developers in Debian is for
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 03:05:17PM +0100, Martin Wuertele wrote:
> Prosecuted according to sec. 3g will be who publishes denial,
> belittlement, approval or compurgation of the national socialist
> genocide via print-media, broadcast or in any other media or in a way
> that is accessible for a lot
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 03:44:34PM +0200, Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote:
> Okay... Maybe you all have heard that Solaris 10 will be under Open
> Source-license. Now they have released at least some kind of license
> text:
>
> http://www.sun.com/cddl/
>
> http://www.crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3:mss:9
> On Thu, 2 Dec 2004, Raul Miller wrote:
> > If there is -- if Wontshare in some way tries to enforce the use of
> > readline, then this non-distributable product is being distributed
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 07:31:06AM -0800, Ken Arromdee wrote:
> Why? Distributing X, which relies on Y, isn't the
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004, Raul Miller wrote:
> If there is -- if Wontshare in some way tries to enforce the use of
> readline, then this non-distributable product is being distributed
Why? Distributing X, which relies on Y, isn't the same as distributing the
combination. Surely you don't think that if
Juhapekka Tolvanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is that license free according to DFSG?
It probably fails the Chinese Dissident test, but I don't think that's a
problem. The requirement to not modify "descriptive text" that provides
attributions /may/ be a problem, but that'll depend on specific
* Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-12-02 19:00]:
> SimNazi is an isometric city simulation. The object of SimNazi is to keep
> your citizens under your thumb, and manage to generate enough resources
> and soldiers to withstand the hardships of WWII.
>
> The game play is centered around
Okay... Maybe you all have heard that Solaris 10 will be under Open
Source-license. Now they have released at least some kind of license
text:
http://www.sun.com/cddl/
http://www.crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3:mss:9125:200412:dmcacncfamieofeochbn
Is that license free according to DFSG?
We ar
15 matches
Mail list logo
