On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 06:32:58PM -0500, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> And, further, the GFDL says I must preserve invariant sections
> "unaltered in their text", not "unaltered in their octects"; I seriously
> doubt that'd count...
Would I be in violation if I was to take a GNU manual, untar it, u
Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Oh, it's possible, the section just ends up as unreadable garbage. Nothing
> in
> the GFDL requires that the invariant sections be readable.
Well, actually, its not because devices easily barf on things that
aren't ASCII.
And, further, the GFDL says I must preserve i
Yorick Cool wrote:
> Seeing as that is a void condition which is totally unenforceable[1], the
> license is just the same as if the condition were inexistent, so yeah,
> it's as good as free.
Ok, I think my point has been missed. After numerous examples (having to
carry around page after page of
Adam McKenna wrote:
> I don't know of any device that rejects files of a particular encoding. Can
> you give an example of such a device?
My portable music player barfs pretty badly on anything that isn't ASCII.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr
On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 07:31:59AM -0800, Jim Westveer wrote:
> Natarajan,
> I am most likely not the person to be asking these questions of.
> You ask:
> >Can I conduct a Course called Debian Certified Engineer (DCE)
> >without asking permission anybody
> You may want to ask this question on
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006, Marco d'Itri wrote:
It looks fine to me, but if it's still a draft then I think it would be
useful to use a wording less vague than "misleading author or version
information".
Agreed. It's fine to say that the package must be labelled as to
modifications made, but this p
Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>Hi. A newly approved IETF document contains reference code for SHA-2,
>>and they propose to use the following license:
>
>>Is this DFSG-free?
> It looks fine to me, but if it's still a draft then I think it would be
> useful
Scripsit Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Perhaps we should consider amending section 4 of the DFSG so
> that instead of only allowing one restriction on modification (changes
> must be distributed in source form as patches to the unmodified
> sources) to allowing any restrictions on a Debian Fre
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Hi. A newly approved IETF document contains reference code for SHA-2,
>and they propose to use the following license:
>Is this DFSG-free?
It looks fine to me, but if it's still a draft then I think it would be
useful to use a wording less vague than "misleading author o
On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 11:27:09AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>Royalty free license to copy and use this software is granted,
> >>provided that redistributed derivative works do not contain
> >>misleading author or version information. Ro
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Royalty free license to copy and use this software is granted,
>>provided that redistributed derivative works do not contain
>>misleading author or version information. Royalty free license is
>>also granted to make and use derivative wo
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 10:22:32AM +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
>> Hi. A newly approved IETF document contains reference code for SHA-2,
>> and they propose to use the following license:
>
>> 1.1 License
>
>>Royalty free license to c
Hi. A newly approved IETF document contains reference code for SHA-2,
and they propose to use the following license:
1.1 License
Royalty free license to copy and use this software is granted,
provided that redistributed derivative works do not contain
misleading author or version inform
Hi Simon,
On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 10:22:32AM +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Hi. A newly approved IETF document contains reference code for SHA-2,
> and they propose to use the following license:
> 1.1 License
>Royalty free license to copy and use this software is granted,
>provided tha
14 matches
Mail list logo