On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 18:40:12 +0100 Gervase Markham wrote:
> Francesco Poli wrote:
>
> > Not-quite-DFSG-free == non-free, even though close to the freeness
> > boundary == proprietary, even though close to the freeness boundary
> >
> > By definition, whatever is not free, is proprietary.
>
> I w
On Wed, 4 Apr 2007 20:01:02 +0200 Michelle Konzack wrote:
[...]
> And currently I create some new weapons but the source of "sunburn"
> for example is around 70 MBytes including the sound effects plus a
> real Video of 480 MByte as source which will be converted to a OGM
> to around 30 MByte.
I'm
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Gervase Markham
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
Francesco Poli wrote:
Not-quite-DFSG-free == non-free, even though close to the freeness
boundary == proprietary, even though close to the freeness boundary
By definition, whatever is not free, is proprietary.
I was u
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Suraj N. Kurapati
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
Anthony W. Youngman wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Suraj N. Kurapati
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
One of my intentions was to specify a set of basic requirements
for my source code and not go far as to restrict t
Am 2007-03-24 23:08:31, schrieb Vsevolod Krishchenko:
> On Saturday 24 March 2007 22:53, you wrote:
>
> > find /usr/share/doc -name copyright|xargs tar czf I_Love_Russia.tar.gz
> >
> > That gives the Russian authorities something to read. :)
>
> Sad point is it must be translated (at least unof
Am 2007-03-28 01:00:13, schrieb Francesco Poli:
> On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 01:18:32 +0800 Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu) wrote:
> > To require the author to use some listed formats for image source or
> > audio source is impracticable.
> Indeed! Because what is source for a work, can be a compiled form for
>
Am 2007-03-28 01:18:32, schrieb Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu):
> Lossless and lossy compression format don't mean anything on preferred
> form for modification. Some recorders do record mp3/ogg directly. And
> some audio editors do edit mp3/ogg directly. And many of the authors of
> the audio works don't
Francesco Poli wrote:
Not-quite-DFSG-free == non-free, even though close to the freeness
boundary == proprietary, even though close to the freeness boundary
By definition, whatever is not free, is proprietary.
I was using proprietary in what I thought was its fairly common meaning,
i.e. clos
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 00:09:30 +0100 Gervase Markham wrote:
> Francesco Poli wrote:
> > Well, *when* I want a copyleft, I want one that *actually works*...
> > Exemptions for specific incompatible licenses should be left out of
> > the license text (so that who wants them can add them as additional
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 10:03:56 -0700 Suraj N. Kurapati wrote:
> If I download some GPL code and it contains some MIT code, can I
> just take those MIT portions and act upon them (1) only according
> to MIT license?
Yes, *as long as* you are able to extract the MIT-licensed part.
In some cases, the
* Gervase Markham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070404 01:09]:
> Calling Affero code proprietary is a pretty big stretch. Yes, there's a
> clause in there which is a restriction on modification - so it's not
> entirely free. But you still have to release the source to
> modifications, source follows the
If I download some GPL code and it contains some MIT code, can I
just take those MIT portions and act upon them (1) only according
to MIT license? (2) only according to GPL? (3) or both?
Thanks for your consideration.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
Anthony W. Youngman wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Suraj N. Kurapati
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>> One of my intentions was to specify a set of basic requirements
>> for my source code and not go far as to restrict the code to a
>> particular license. That is, I want to allow my code t
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Suraj N. Kurapati
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
Anthony W. Youngman wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Suraj N. Kurapati
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
The MIT license has the following properties (from Ed Burnette's
survey[3] of free software licenses):
4. Source
14 matches
Mail list logo
