On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 01:42:13PM +0400, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 11:40:19PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> > Stanislav Maslovski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > One thing that I have to note also that after this standard header
> > > the author writes: "For more details
Sorry for any etiquette foobars I may have made, I wrote that email in a bit
of a hurry this morning.
So I still don't understand the original claim that connecting a 3d IM
> client to an AGPLv3'd GTalk server would allow Google to obtain the
> source of the client. Anyone?
When the client per
2008/8/19 Arc Riley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> To cut down on number of emails, I'm replying to both Miriam and Francesco
> below:
Thanks a lot for your explanation, it clarifies a lot of things.
> You are absolutely allowed to use that software in a private manner without
> AGPLv3 section 13 coming
To cut down on number of emails, I'm replying to both Miriam and Francesco
below:
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 8:53 AM, Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> But there's a significant difference in reliability when the
> Corresponding Source is hosted on the *same* server where the
> AfferoGPLv3'
"Arc Riley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You're taking quite a few steps forward on logic here, let's rewind a bit.
Please avoid personalising this discussion. Also, I am reading the
list, so there is no need to cc me, as per the code of conduct.
Finally, I've tried to correct the botched quotes,
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 07:38:26 -0400 Arc Riley wrote:
[On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 09:45:18 +0100 MJ Ray wrote:]
> > Free (as in cost) code hosting services do not offer guarantees of
> > availability or longevity, so the user must still host their own copy
> > too, else the C.Source may not be available wh
2008/8/19 Arc Riley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Greets. It's been awhile since I unsubscribed to this list, so a quick
> introduction is that I'm the maintainer of the PySoy project, the game
> engine being discussed here.
Thanks a lot for your input here, Arc :)
> your modified version must prominen
You're taking quite a few steps forward on logic here, let's rewind a bit.
I'm not sure that that's the case, but that seems like a pretty clear
> contamination of unrelated software, which would break DFSG 9.
It does not change the license of that software in other uses, it only
applies the te
Dear Madam,
Dear Sir,
Please allow us to draw your attention to the first EOLE conference
(European Opensource Lawyers Event) on free/opensource software law that
will take place at Paris on the 24^th of September, within the framework
of the "Paris, capitale du libre" event.
The topic of th
"Arc Riley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Given the thread thus far to paste AGPL section 13, the only section which
> differs from the GPLv3 beyond name changes:
>
> 13. Remote Network Interaction; Use with the GNU General Public License.
>
> Notwithstanding any other provision of this License,
10 matches
Mail list logo
