"Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One's modification and distribution over a network of that software,
> let's be explicit. And I argue that this extra cost is no greater than
> the cost of providing the network interface that's triggering this
> clause in the first place.
I d
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Arc Riley wrote:
> > I agree, which is why we chose the AGPLv3 for our project.
> >
> > I've gotten the impression, though, that many people on this list are
> > arguing against the AGPL on the basis that they want to retain people's
> > "freedom" to exploit the ASP looph
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 4:08 AM, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > One's modification and distribution over a network of that software,
> > let's be explicit. And I argue that this extra cost is no greater than
> > the cost of providing th
On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 09:19 -0400, Arc Riley wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 4:08 AM, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > One's modification and distribution over a network of that
> software,
> > l
"Arc Riley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It has already been made clear that you're not required to
> distribute the modified source on the same network connection as the
> remote interaction.
Has it? I haven't seen how anything but "convey the corresponding
source at the same time and from the
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 9:34 AM, Karl Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Suppose the following scenario:
>
> Someone gives you a CD with debian, and you install the weblog tool,
> which happens to be agpl.
> Your internet connection is two way satalite, 500mb/month, data both
> directions costs, a
2008/9/11 Arc Riley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> You just changed it.
>> You now have to make it available (with its dependancies? i'm not sure).
>
> No. It is neither standard nor customary to re-release an entire package
> for a small bugfix. You could just upload a patch to the project's mailing
>
Package: php5
Version: 5.2.0-8
Severity: serious
Please have a look into line 144-148 of ext/standard/rand.c:
"When you use this, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with an appropriate reference to your work.
It would be nice to CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Author homepage: http://www.math.sci.hiroshima-u.ac.jp/~m-mat/MT/emt.html
Current license of the code
http://www.math.sci.hiroshima-u.ac.jp/~m-mat/MT/MT2002/elicense.html
So looks like documentation bug.
Ondrej.
2008/9/11 Jan Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Package: php5
> Version: 5.2.0-8
> Seve
On Thursday 11 September 2008, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> Author homepage: http://www.math.sci.hiroshima-u.ac.jp/~m-mat/MT/emt.html
>
> Current license of the code
> http://www.math.sci.hiroshima-u.ac.jp/~m-mat/MT/MT2002/elicense.html
>
> So looks like documentation bug.
Okay ... but how to process here
"Arc Riley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 4:08 AM, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > One's modification and distribution over a network of that software,
> > > let's be explicit. And I argue that this extra cost i
2008/9/11 MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> "Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> So in case this is an unreasonable burden, the GPL *and* AGPL provide
>> other ways to convey source, like CDs.
>
> How would that satisfy section 13? A CD isn't a network server.
A network server, su
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 17:56:27 +0200 Raúl Sánchez Siles wrote:
> Hello All:
>
> I'm working to close correctly bug #495269.
Good, your effort is really appreciated.
> OpenSSL exception for GPL has
> been overlooked until now.
[...]
> As KVIrc main developer states, next stable release 3.4.
Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If the two licenses are "nearly identical", then surely the difference
> in the effect of the license terms is important enough that the FSF
> promotes the AGPL on the basis of that difference. To do otherwise is
> to argue against the very license prolifer
14 matches
Mail list logo
