License for ATI driver documentation

Hello, I hope you can help with some ideas and also clear a few of my questions. I'm not a lawyer, so I hope, you can give a few hints. I'm writing manpages for the proprietary ATI driver, which are included in the Debian package. You can find the source here: http://cvs.wgdd.de/cgi-bin/cvsweb/f

Re: License for ATI driver documentation

Am Montag, den 30.01.2006, 00:42 -0800 schrieb Walter Landry: > Daniel Leidert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I hope you can help with some ideas and also clear a few of my > > questions. I'm not a lawyer, so I hope, you can give a few hints. I'm > &g

Re: License for ATI driver documentation

Am Montag, den 30.01.2006, 13:43 -0800 schrieb Walter Landry: > Daniel Leidert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [documentation license] > > Ok. Here my suggestion: > > > > /-- > > > Copyright (C) > > > [..] > > \

OSSAL/CC license of xMule parts

Hello, I'm currently preparing an updated xMule package and found a statement, which sounds a bit problematic. But I'm not a lawyer, so I ask you. E.g. xLibs/DynPrefs/DynamicPreferences.cpp states: // This file is dually licensed under the terms of the following licenses: // * Primary License: OS

Re: Shouldn't flashplugin-nonfree be in non-free

Am Mittwoch, den 19.03.2008, 09:41 +0100 schrieb timothy demulder: > Could someone explain me why flashplugin-nonfree is residing in > contrib and not in non-free? http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-sections HTH and Regards, Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO

Re: remote logo inclusion in package documentation

Am Dienstag, den 03.12.2019, 13:13 + schrieb Ian Jackson: > Paride Legovini writes ("remote logo inclusion in package documentation"): > > Hello debian-legal, > > > > The latest upstream version of a package I maintain (libmseed) ships > > with HTML documentation. The HTML documentation fetche

Re: Hosting the original youtube-dl sources on salsa?

rds, Daniel -- Regards, Daniel Leidert | https://www.wgdd.de/ GPG-Key RSA4096 / BEED4DED5544A4C03E283DC74BCD0567C296D05D GPG-Key ED25519 / BD3C132D8B3805D1808123AB7ACE00941E338C78 If you like my work consider sponsoring me via https://www.patreon.com/join/dleidert signature.asc Description: Thi

Re: Advice on licenses with "funny" amendments

ight cause legal trouble if the authors later claim that their request was meant as an obligation. I'd expect the first one ("BUT ..." - a clear exception) to be more troublesome than the latter ("Please do..."). In the latter case one could ask the authors if it is ok to shi