ny of thse to be sure, so you should double check,
and I'm judging by the Fedora wiki to see if its GPL compat or not.
thanks,
kk
--
Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS)
Debian contributor / gNewSense Maintainer
http://www.kgoetz.id.au
No, I won't join your social networking group
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
eply to spam in future - it only helps legitimise it
for the spamassasin instance.)
thanks,
kk
> -tuna
>
> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 2:11 PM, RNW Yorkton
> wrote:
> >
> > ISSUE #15: May 13, 2011 7,593 Readers This Month!
--
Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS)
udes a provision requiring changes to be your
> “original creation”. Free software development depends on combining
> code from third parties, and the NASA license doesn't permit this."
Have you let the OSI know? its possible someone made a mistake, or they
may simply disagree with the FS
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 18:46:04 +0200
Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:39:05 +1000 Karl Goetz wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 15:42:32 -0400
> > Michael Hanke wrote:
> >
> > > Dear -legal,
> > >
> > > I'm currently looking
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 11:20:46 -0400
Michael Hanke wrote:
> [I've set reply-to to me, because I'm not subscribed to this list]
>
> Karl Goetz wrote:
> > >
> > > http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/s/slicer/slicer_3.6.3~svn16075-2/slicer.copyrig
ussing it.
Could you include the actual licence terms for the package you are
working on, perhaps with its itp bug number?
kk
--
Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS)
Debian contributor / gNewSense Maintainer
http://www.kgoetz.id.au
No, I won't join your social networking group
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, 5 Apr 2009 19:00:00 +0200
Mark Weyer wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 05, 2009 at 09:57:39PM +0930, Karl Goetz wrote:
> > Hi Mark,
> > I was wondering if you found any licences that fit what you were
> > looking for? I didnt see a resolution to the thread [1] the first
> &
Hi Mark,
I was wondering if you found any licences that fit what you were
looking for? I didnt see a resolution to the thread [1] the first time
around.
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2009/01/msg00072.html
kk
--
Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS)
Debian user / gNewSense contributor
group also pre-announced the release
> of a new license for cloud computing, the "CloudLeft Public License
> (CPL)". The event coincides with the close of the Cloud Computing
> Expo in New York City. Full details will be available next Monday.
>
kk
--
Karl Goetz, (Kamping_
to add a licence that was created with a very specific
goal in mind (relicencing wikipedia) which will expire in 9 months
(August next year).
kk
> Thanks.
>
>
--
Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS)
Debian user / gNewSense contributor
http://www.kgoetz.id.au
No, I won't join your social networking group
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
t Linux.conf.au this year in the games miniconf,
someone from CC Australia was recomending the use of CC (-SA i think)
for game data, and said it didnt conflict with the GPL.
Unfortunately i dont think that part of the day was recorded :(
Heres the miniconf link, incase you want to check.
http:/
s forced
> to become a member of a cooperative. Participation remains is
> voluntary.
I'm not worried about people who 'opt in' to agpl software, i'm worried
about people who *dont realise* what agpl means to them, and wind up in
a tricky legal corner.
kk
>
>
--
On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 11:28 +, John Halton wrote:
> On Jan 23, 2008 10:58 AM, Karl Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Here, for the record - and to save Francesco Poli the trouble ;-) - is
> the full text of the relevant section of the k
Source Code, whether
created by OpenVision or by a third party." I think this could threat
this software freedom.
pitof
___
gNewSense-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-users
--
Karl Goetz &
nt. What is Debian's policy as regards software that
> is encumbered by patents in one jurisdiction but not others?
I expect many places with Free Trade Agreements with the USA will
'inherit' the patent from the US.
Australia and New Zealand fall in this catagory i think.
kk
&g
MJ Ray wrote:
Michael Poole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Karl Goetz writes:
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-knoppix/2006/06/msg00019.html
[2] http://www.truecrypt.org/license.php
[...]
Overall, this seems like a fairly pointless and dangerous but not
clearly unfree license; GPLv2 or v2+ wi
Hi all
I was looking at truecrypt, and noticed that the licence is not
considered 'free' by Klause Knopper[1], but i don't see a view from
debian-legal. does anyone know if this licence [2] would be free enough
to ship with debian?
Or, for that matter, if its come up before on the list and i co
17 matches
Mail list logo
