On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 1:20 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
> I'll setup a mechanism to have libav extend the copyright file for each
> binary packages, adding to header section a reasoned effective license.
>
> ...and will start do similar for all the other packages that I am
> involved in, as I
tags 698019 help
stop
Copying debian-legal and netgen mostly for notifying them about this
issue. Also, see the call for help below.
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 11:43 PM, Francesco Poli (wintermute)
wrote:
> Source: libav
> Version: 6:9.1-1
> Severity: important
>
> Hello again,
> while trying to im
t
for inclusion in the 'non-free' section?
--
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://li
This should address the "additional restrictions" concern.
Do you agree with this theory?
--
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.
And a similar one for AMR-WB.)
>
> So as far as I can tell, PacketVideo has the right to license these
> files
> under the apache license.
>
> // Martin
Looks ok then. Their AAC stuff is scarier because it lacks the
"Permission to distribute, modify and use this file u
be that the libavcodec.so.52 library (on-disk)
would be usable stand-alone, i.e. the additional restrictions that the
GPLv2 prohibits cannot come into affect when redistributing the
libavcodec package.
Does this sound acceptable for debian? Other Opinions?
--
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler,
, licensing and patent issues
> Discussions about legality issues such as copyrights, patents etc.
>
> It does not restrict itself to dispensing the decisions of the
> ftp-masters.
Perhaps that should be fixed then.
--
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4
--
To UNS
7 matches
Mail list logo
