"depends" on the data blobs it interprets, in the Debian sense of
"dependence".
~ESP
--
Evan Prodromou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
ogram would contain code
from the proprietary library.
~ESP
--
Evan Prodromou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
x27;t work* without these
ROMs. No matter what "data" ROM you want to run, you need the OS ROMs to
do so.
I know it may be a fine point, but I'd contrast that with an emulator
that is free and self-sufficient, but for which there is no DFSG-free
software to run.
~ESP
--
Evan Prodromou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
in in the first
place? Was it your decision, or did you get advice on the matter from
others? Was it just because the game ROMs are usually non-free, or was
there other software (such as an operating-system ROM) that was
required?
Thanks for your help.
~ESP
--
Evan Prodromou <[EMAIL P
n closing: I think it's a mistake to leave out Free Software just
because there's not Free Data for that software to work with.
~ESP
--
Evan Prodromou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
at? Mind your own beeswax,
Debian.
~ESP
--
Evan Prodromou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
hat contracts have to be bilingual nor in the
dominant language; just that both parties understand the language of the
contract.
~ESP
--
Evan Prodromou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
and.
>
> It's stupid that this clause has to be in the license in order to
> achieve that.
I agree; it's much more applicable for contracts.
~ESP
--
Evan Prodromou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
ding
rather than intention.
We could hand this over to Creative Commons with some suggested changes,
as well as some information about our project and why having works be
DFSG-free is important.
~ESP
--
Evan Prodromou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
e I'm not sure if you're on
debian-legal. If you are, sorry for the double-post.
--
Evan Prodromou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Mon, 2004-07-05 at 19:15, Evan Prodromou wrote:
> So, I'd like to write a draft summary for the 6 Creative Commons 2.0
> licenses:
So, I've started this summary,
http://people.debian.org/~evan/ccsummary.sxw
(and, yes, I'll convert it to HTML and plain text ASA
On Tue, 2004-07-06 at 15:47, MJ Ray wrote:
> On 2004-07-06 20:15:25 +0100 Evan Prodromou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > included the three main arguments why Attribution 2.0 is non-free
>
> At least in this context, we should say instead that software released
>
On Tue, 2004-07-06 at 17:18, Evan Prodromou wrote:
> Section 4a) allows the author to forbid reference to the user. Section
> 4b) requires authorship credit.
s/the user/themselves/
~ESP
--
Evan Prodromou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Wikitravel (http://wikitravel.org/)
signature.asc
Descr
Branden Robinson wrote:
Evan was fishing for support for his position in a recent thread entitled
"Visualboy Advance question."[1]. "Some other debian-legal people" appears to
refer to Humberto Massa, in one message.[2]
To be clear: I was soliciting information, not hu
Francesco Poli wrote:
On Wed, 7 Jul 2004 14:00:47 -0400 Glenn Maynard wrote:
I think there's a fairly significant difference between an emulator
that will load and display an "insert ROM" image (eg. NES, SNES), and
one that requires a specific non-free image in order to be able to do
anythi
Branden Robinson wrote:
I know it may be a fine point, but I'd contrast that with an emulator
that is free and self-sufficient, but for which there is no DFSG-free
software to run.
A *lot* of old home computer emulators won't be self-sufficient without the
ROM, because the environments we
Branden Robinson wrote:
I know it may be a fine point, but I'd contrast that with an emulator
that is free and self-sufficient, but for which there is no DFSG-free
software to run.
A *lot* of old home computer emulators won't be self-sufficient without the
ROM, because the environments we
Florian Weimer wrote:
How? As MJ said, it's clearly "practical" to remove the author's
name in places where it would nevertheless be a grievous
restriction.
So you suggest that if someone approaches Debian and asks his name to
be removed, Debian would ignore this request even if it can be
ho
101 - 118 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
