Rogério,
As a handful of us predicted youtube-dl has been reinstated on GitHub:
https://github.blog/2020-11-16-standing-up-for-developers-youtube-dl-is-back/
I would remove the problematic tests from your fork to avoid future issues.
Again, thank you for being a maintainer. I use youtube-dl
On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 09:16:21AM +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
> Rogério Brito writes:
>
> > Dear people,
> >
> > As many of you may know, the RIAA issued a resquest for GitHub to take down
> > the youtube-dl repository.
>
> IANAL so I may be confused, but AIUI that takedown is based on the
>
On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 09:16:21AM +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
> IANAL so I may be confused, but AIUI that takedown is based on the
> notion that there is no legitimate use for youtube-dl, which is
> nonsense, as this comment clealy demonstrates:
>
> "youtube-dl is pretty much the only thing that
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 04:59:53PM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
> Dear people,
>
> As many of you may know, the RIAA issued a resquest for GitHub to take down
> the youtube-dl repository.
>
> The tree had some fixes that were *not* in the latest release that I
> uploaded a few days ago (I am the
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 11:15:34PM +0100, Dominik George wrote:
> The RIAA seems to be targeting the most vulnerable and leat likely to
> defend themselves, otherweise they would be targeting those who upload
> content violating copyright laws instead on free software maintainers.
>
> (Also,
Le jeudi 29 octobre 2020 à 16:59:53-0300, Rogério Brito a écrit :
> Dear people,
>
> As many of you may know, the RIAA issued a resquest for GitHub to take down
> the youtube-dl repository.
>
> The tree had some fixes that were *not* in the latest release that I
> uploaded a few days ago (I am
On 2020, ഒക്ടോബർ 30 1:46:21 PM IST, Philip Hands wrote:
>We could presumably consult a lawyer, but the RIAA would need to be even
>more moronic than I think they are to have a go at us, given that nobody
>in the wider world has ever heard of us, and we're going to have no
>trouble raising
Rogério Brito writes:
> Dear people,
>
> As many of you may know, the RIAA issued a resquest for GitHub to take down
> the youtube-dl repository.
IANAL so I may be confused, but AIUI that takedown is based on the
notion that there is no legitimate use for youtube-dl, which is
nonsense, as this
Am Donnerstag, den 29.10.2020, 16:59 -0300 schrieb Rogério Brito:
> As many of you may know, the RIAA issued a resquest for GitHub to take down
> the youtube-dl repository.
[..]
> Given this situation, can I upload a backup of youtube-dl to salsa under my
> user account? I already maintain the
I though I saw something about it being reinstated but without the..
rolling encryption I think they called it.
Obviously you would want to confirm and qualify that but it might change
things.
- Craig
On Fri, 30 Oct 2020, 07:18 Rogério Brito, wrote:
> Dear people,
>
> As many of you may
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 04:59:53PM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
> Since the tree was taken down (and, to boot, of the 18 forks listed in the
> takedown request, mine was explicitly listed), I fear that me uploading the
> lastest tree to GitHub is asking for trouble.
>
> Given this situation,
Rogério,
First, thank you for maintaining youtube-dl.
Second, I get your concern, especially since one of your forks was listed.
In general I think my advice would be to not do anything right now.
There are grounds to challenge the takedown as DMCA overreach. [1] I
think GitHub is going to
Dear people,
As many of you may know, the RIAA issued a resquest for GitHub to take down
the youtube-dl repository.
The tree had some fixes that were *not* in the latest release that I
uploaded a few days ago (I am the maintainer of youtube-dl in Debian, just
to make things clear).
Since the
13 matches
Mail list logo
