Bug#897244: lintian: doc-base-file-references-missing-file for files in depending package

On Sat, May 05, 2018 at 07:02:52AM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > Not only has this has been an "E:" tag since it was introduced in > 2006 (and presumably it is yourself who decided to move the files to > the -common package anyway), I'm afraid the idea that the Lintian The package is completely new.

Bug#897244: lintian: doc-base-file-references-missing-file for files in depending package

Hi, On Sat, May 05, 2018 at 10:30:38AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > The package is completely new. there is no "moving packages" here and > it's only installed one time upstream, too. There's no real way I'd > duplicate that media/ dir in every -help-xx package manually either :) > > The help b

Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2877

See Changes: [pabs] spelling: Add another correction -- [...truncated 236.01 KB...] Adding debian:Entrust_Root_Certification_Authority_-_G2.pem Adding debian:Entrust_Roo

Bug#897608: lintian: warn that debug symbol migration is complete

Hi Mattia On 4 May 2018 at 23:06, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > Whilst true that several packages could potentially remove the > "migration" path, and IMHO even for most of the ones that added it it > wouldn't have been necessary, It's a lot more than several packages; codesearch.debian.net shows 1255

Bug#897244: lintian: doc-base-file-references-missing-file for files in depending package

Rene, > And probably even causing a reject from NEW. > 4000 errors/per > package. Well, I happen to disagree and nor do I think that a large number of (false-positive) warnings being temporarily displayed on lintian.d.o would change peoples' perceptions of you. But this all misses my *main* poin

Bug#897244: lintian: doc-base-file-references-missing-file for files in depending package

Hi, On Sat, May 05, 2018 at 04:48:12PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > > And probably even causing a reject from NEW. > 4000 errors/per > > package. > > Well, I happen to disagree and nor do I think that a large number of > (false-positive) warnings I'd agree for _warnings_, yes. Not errors. and the

Bug#897244: lintian: doc-base-file-references-missing-file for files in depending package

Rene Engelhard wrote: > I'd agree for _warnings_, yes. > > Not errors. and these are errors. Firstly, such a distinction not really relevant here; both are displayed on DDPO and an outsider reading lintian.d.o would not be aware of any nuance between the two. Secondly this state of affairs won'

Bug#884567: lintian: Report about mismatches between the Build-IDs field and the content of /usr/lib/debug/

tags 884567 + moreinfo thanks Hi, > lintian: Report about mismatches between the Build-IDs field and > the content of /usr/lib/debug/ Is this still an issue with a fixed debhelper? Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk

Bug#896465: lintian: Lintian should warn on udebs depending on non-udeb packages

tags 896465 + moreinfo thanks Hi! > Is it possible to add a check that udeb package depends on a deb > package? Is this possible from lintian's "view of the world"? It does not have access to APT so thus would not know the difference between, say, libzastd1 and libzstd1. Best wishes, --

Processed: Re: lintian: Lintian should warn on udebs depending on non-udeb packages

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 896465 + moreinfo Bug #896465 [lintian] lintian: Lintian should warn on udebs depending on non-udeb packages Added tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 896465: https://bugs.debian

Processed: Re: lintian: Report about mismatches between the Build-IDs field and the content of /usr/lib/debug/

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 884567 + moreinfo Bug #884567 [lintian] lintian: Report about mismatches between the Build-IDs field and the content of /usr/lib/debug/ Added tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. --

Processed: Re: lintian: Check for -dev -> runtime library package dependencies

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 880922 + moreinfo Bug #880922 [lintian] lintian: Check for -dev -> runtime library package dependencies Added tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 880922: https://bugs.debian.org/

Bug#880922: lintian: Check for -dev -> runtime library package dependencies

tags 880922 + moreinfo thanks Hi Christoph, > Hopefully, implementation would not that difficult: In debian/control, > identify -dev packages, in the libdevel section, and if there's a > related package in the lib section, the -dev package > should have a strict versioned dependency on the runti

Processed: Re: lintian: Pedantic check for packages not using debhelper or CDBS

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 884499 + moreinfo Bug #884499 [lintian] lintian: Pedantic check for packages not using debhelper or CDBS Added tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 884499: https://bugs.debian.org

Bug#884499: lintian: Pedantic check for packages not using debhelper or CDBS

tags 884499 + moreinfo thanks Hi, > lintian: Pedantic check for packages not using debhelper or CDBS I'm in two minds about this. Whilst I would like everyone to use such things, as it was pointed out recently Lintian tags should always be actionable. If one's personal style was not to use debh

Bug#884499: lintian: Pedantic check for packages not using debhelper or CDBS

Chris Lamb wrote: > > lintian: Pedantic check for packages not using debhelper or CDBS We actually already have this as a classification tag of sorts in checks/debhelper.pm: if (%build_systems) { my @systems = sort(keys(%build_systems)); tag 'debian-build-system', join(', ',

Bug#884499: lintian: Pedantic check for packages not using debhelper or CDBS

tags 884499 + pending thanks Actually, let's give this a whirl. Implemented in Git, pending upload: https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/commit/1ecc761fea7b22f85faf400ac134d24438454e4d checks/debhelper.desc | 12 +++ checks/debhelper.pm

Processed: Re: lintian: Pedantic check for packages not using debhelper or CDBS

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 884499 + pending Bug #884499 [lintian] lintian: Pedantic check for packages not using debhelper or CDBS Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 884499: https://bugs.debian.org/c

Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2878

See Changes: [lamby] Add tests for cross-package doc-base-file-references-missing-file. -- [...truncated 236.10 KB...] Adding debian:Entrust_Root_Certification_Authority

Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2879

See Changes: [lamby] Add a pedantic warning for packages that do not use debhelper or CBDS. -- [...truncated 236.12 KB...] Adding debian:Entrust_Root_Certification_Autho

Bug#897244: lintian: doc-base-file-references-missing-file for files in depending package

Rene Engelhard writes: > ... and on DDPO, which is what I care about right now. (And NEW) > 143548 _errors_ Just as a data point, if I saw 143,548 errors in a Debian package from an experienced maintainer such as yourself, my immediate first thought would be some bug in Lintian. Not that you h

Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2880

See -- [...truncated 236.01 KB...] Adding debian:Entrust_Root_Certification_Authority_-_G2.pem Adding debian:Entrust_Root_Certification_Authority_-_EC1.pem Adding debian:Entrust_Root_Ce

Processed: Re: Bug#884567: lintian: Report about mismatches between the Build-IDs field and the content of /usr/lib/debug/

Processing control commands: > tag -1 - moreinfo Bug #884567 [lintian] lintian: Report about mismatches between the Build-IDs field and the content of /usr/lib/debug/ Removed tag(s) moreinfo. -- 884567: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=884567 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#884567: lintian: Report about mismatches between the Build-IDs field and the content of /usr/lib/debug/

Control: tag -1 - moreinfo On Sat, May 05, 2018 at 05:36:27PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > > lintian: Report about mismatches between the Build-IDs field and > > the content of /usr/lib/debug/ > > Is this still an issue with a fixed debhelper? AFAIK it is not, but I believe lintian should check fo

Bug#884499: marked as done (lintian: Pedantic check for packages not using debhelper or CDBS)

Your message dated Sun, 06 May 2018 00:05:32 + with message-id and subject line Bug#884499: fixed in lintian 2.5.85 has caused the Debian Bug report #884499, regarding lintian: Pedantic check for packages not using debhelper or CDBS to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pro

Bug#896671: marked as done (lintian: false positive description-synopsis-might-not-be-phrased-properly on 'e.g.')

Your message dated Sun, 06 May 2018 00:05:32 + with message-id and subject line Bug#896671: fixed in lintian 2.5.85 has caused the Debian Bug report #896671, regarding lintian: false positive description-synopsis-might-not-be-phrased-properly on 'e.g.' to be marked as done. This means that y

Bug#896675: marked as done (lintian: false positive non-consecutive-debian-revision on source package rename)

Your message dated Sun, 06 May 2018 00:05:32 + with message-id and subject line Bug#896675: fixed in lintian 2.5.85 has caused the Debian Bug report #896675, regarding lintian: false positive non-consecutive-debian-revision on source package rename to be marked as done. This means that you c

Bug#897082: marked as done (lintian: Please clarify what to do with debian-watch-uses-insecure-uri for ftp:// URIs)

Your message dated Sun, 06 May 2018 00:05:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#897082: fixed in lintian 2.5.85 has caused the Debian Bug report #897082, regarding lintian: Please clarify what to do with debian-watch-uses-insecure-uri for ftp:// URIs to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#897213: marked as done (lintian: Please remove dependency-on-python-version-marked-for-end-of-life until after Buster releases)

Your message dated Sun, 06 May 2018 00:05:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#897213: fixed in lintian 2.5.85 has caused the Debian Bug report #897213, regarding lintian: Please remove dependency-on-python-version-marked-for-end-of-life until after Buster releases to be marked as done.

Bug#892304: marked as done (lintian: Warn about "old" X-Python3-Version fields?)

Your message dated Sun, 06 May 2018 00:05:32 + with message-id and subject line Bug#892304: fixed in lintian 2.5.85 has caused the Debian Bug report #892304, regarding lintian: Warn about "old" X-Python3-Version fields? to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#896840: marked as done (lintian: testsuite failures with file 5.33)

Your message dated Sun, 06 May 2018 00:05:32 + with message-id and subject line Bug#896840: fixed in lintian 2.5.85 has caused the Debian Bug report #896840, regarding lintian: testsuite failures with file 5.33 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi

Bug#897157: marked as done (lintian: Allow /usr/share/doc/$pkg/examples to be a symlink)

Your message dated Sun, 06 May 2018 00:05:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#897157: fixed in lintian 2.5.85 has caused the Debian Bug report #897157, regarding lintian: Allow /usr/share/doc/$pkg/examples to be a symlink to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#897166: marked as done (lintian: default-mta-dependency-not-listed-first false positive, if default-mta is not first in field)

Your message dated Sun, 06 May 2018 00:05:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#897166: fixed in lintian 2.5.85 has caused the Debian Bug report #897166, regarding lintian: default-mta-dependency-not-listed-first false positive, if default-mta is not first in field to be marked as done.

Bug#897244: marked as done (lintian: doc-base-file-references-missing-file for files in depending package)

Your message dated Sun, 06 May 2018 00:05:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#897244: fixed in lintian 2.5.85 has caused the Debian Bug report #897244, regarding lintian: doc-base-file-references-missing-file for files in depending package to be marked as done. This means that you clai

Bug#897248: marked as done (lintian: Fails to process haskell-crypto on lindsay.d.o)

Your message dated Sun, 06 May 2018 00:05:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#897248: fixed in lintian 2.5.85 has caused the Debian Bug report #897248, regarding lintian: Fails to process haskell-crypto on lindsay.d.o to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#897424: marked as done (lintian: Update Java bytecode checks for openjdk-10)

Your message dated Sun, 06 May 2018 00:05:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#897424: fixed in lintian 2.5.85 has caused the Debian Bug report #897424, regarding lintian: Update Java bytecode checks for openjdk-10 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#897402: marked as done (lintian: false-positive of spelling-error-in-copyright on duplicate word from license key)

Your message dated Sun, 06 May 2018 00:05:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#897402: fixed in lintian 2.5.85 has caused the Debian Bug report #897402, regarding lintian: false-positive of spelling-error-in-copyright on duplicate word from license key to be marked as done. This means t

Bug#897638: marked as done (lintian: please add Ubuntu cosmic as a supported distribution)

Your message dated Sun, 06 May 2018 00:05:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#897638: fixed in lintian 2.5.85 has caused the Debian Bug report #897638, regarding lintian: please add Ubuntu cosmic as a supported distribution to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the proble

Bug#897639: marked as done (lintian: testsuite fails when ld is configured with --as-needed by default)

Your message dated Sun, 06 May 2018 00:05:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#897639: fixed in lintian 2.5.85 has caused the Debian Bug report #897639, regarding lintian: testsuite fails when ld is configured with --as-needed by default to be marked as done. This means that you claim t

Bug#897915: marked as done (lintian -- False positive on orphaned-package-not-maintained-in-debian-infrastructure)

Your message dated Sun, 06 May 2018 00:05:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#897915: fixed in lintian 2.5.85 has caused the Debian Bug report #897915, regarding lintian -- False positive on orphaned-package-not-maintained-in-debian-infrastructure to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#897692: marked as done (lintian: overly generic python module file name: /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/scripts/__init__.py)

Your message dated Sun, 06 May 2018 00:05:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#897692: fixed in lintian 2.5.85 has caused the Debian Bug report #897692, regarding lintian: overly generic python module file name: /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/scripts/__init__.py to be marked as done. Th

Processing of lintian_2.5.85_amd64.changes

lintian_2.5.85_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: lintian_2.5.85.dsc lintian_2.5.85.tar.xz lintian_2.5.85_all.deb lintian_2.5.85_amd64.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

lintian_2.5.85_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 05 May 2018 23:31:53 + Source: lintian Binary: lintian Architecture: source all Version: 2.5.85 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Lintian Maintainers Changed-By: Chris Lamb Description

Jenkins build is back to normal : lintian-tests_sid #2881

See

Bug#884499: lintian: Pedantic check for packages not using debhelper or CDBS

On Sat, 05 May 2018 19:42:05 +0100 Chris Lamb wrote: > tags 884499 + pending > thanks > > Actually, let's give this a whirl. Implemented in Git, > pending upload: > > > https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/commit/1ecc761fea7b22f85faf400ac134d24438454e4d > > checks/debhelper.desc