Hi,
Over the past week, we had some reprotest failures on HTML
documentation. A simple, recursive diff is attached. I cannot figure
out the reason. Any pointers are appreciated.
Kind regards,
Felix Lechner
html-docs.diff.xz
Description: application/xz
Hi Felix,
* Felix Lechner [Mon Nov 16, 2020 at 02:36:20PM -0800]:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 2:24 PM Michael Prokop wrote:
> > ... then lintian 2.101.0 + 2.101.0~bpo10+1 fails hard with:
> If you are using backports, why not switch your profile over to:
> Disable-Tags: no-nmu-in-changelog
Hi Michael,
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 2:24 PM Michael Prokop wrote:
>
> ... then lintian 2.101.0 + 2.101.0~bpo10+1 fails hard with:
If you are using backports, why not switch your profile over to:
Disable-Tags: no-nmu-in-changelog
I think that might work on both 2.101.0 + 2.101.0~bpo10+1.
K
Package: lintian
Version: 2.101.0
Severity: important
Hi,
using the following lintian profile:
, [ /etc/lintian/profiles/example or
~/.lintian/profiles/example/main.profile ]
| Profile: example/main
| Extends: debian/main
| Disable-Tags: changelog-should-mention-nmu
`
... then lintian
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #972567 [lintian] lintian: Fatal errors including 'Cannot run origtar check
on package source'
Bug #970750 [lintian] lintian: cannot run origtar check on package
source:nvidia-cuda-toolkit/10.2.89-5
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #972567 t
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #970750 [lintian] lintian: cannot run origtar check on package
source:nvidia-cuda-toolkit/10.2.89-5
Bug #972567 [lintian] lintian: Fatal errors including 'Cannot run origtar check
on package source'
Added tag(s) pending.
Added tag(s) pending.
--
Felix Lechner wrote:
> I sympathize with your desire for clarity and have put a lot of time
> toward that goal. In the case of the watch file, I know what you mean
> but I do not arrive at the same conclusion.
>
> Perhaps you can agree that clarity is improved when different things
> have differen
Hi Private,
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 3:45 AM Pirate Praveen wrote:
>
> As there is no standard field in debian/watch or there is no
> debian/watch/standard file. It would be obvious to someone who is
> experienced, but making it clearly spelt is helpful to newbies.
I sympathize with your desire f
Pirate Praveen wrote:
> In many lintian outputs (I use lintian -iIEcv --pedantic --color auto),
> Check: is a very good clue for people who are new to packaging. But it
> could be improved further.
"Check: X" here actually refers to the internal script (or "check") that
Lintian runs as part of it
Package: lintian
severity: wishlist
In many lintian outputs (I use lintian -iIEcv --pedantic --color auto),
Check: is a very good clue for people who are new to packaging. But it
could be improved further.
For example in this case,
I: ruby-grape-path-helpers source: older-debian-watch-file-s
10 matches
Mail list logo
