Hi Sean,
On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 3:37 PM Sean Whitton wrote:
>
> I believe that we failed to consider udebs when we made the change which
> made S-V mandatory. I propose we remove the requirement for S-V in
> udebs and source packages producing only udebs, until and unless someone
> provides a p
> "Sean" == Sean Whitton writes:
Sean> On Thu 12 Aug 2021 at 11:47PM +02, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>> Sean Whitton (2021-08-12):
>>> On Tue 27 Jul 2021 at 08:41AM -06, Sam Hartman wrote:
>>>
>>> >
>>> > So, it seems fairly obvious to me that Standards-Version is
Hi Sam,
On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 7:42 AM Sam Hartman wrote:
>
> I'd need to know more ... in order to have an opinion on
> whether there should be an obligation to comply with these aspects of
> policy.
Thank you for your line of thinking. I totally agree with you.
> 1) I realize i don't entirel
Package: debian-policy
[resending to submit@; can't clone merged bug]
Hello,
On Thu 12 Aug 2021 at 11:47PM +02, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Sean Whitton (2021-08-12):
>> On Tue 27 Jul 2021 at 08:41AM -06, Sam Hartman wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > So, it seems fairly obvious to me that Standards-Version is
[resending to submit@; can't clone merged bug]
Hello,
On Thu 12 Aug 2021 at 11:47PM +02, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Sean Whitton (2021-08-12):
>> On Tue 27 Jul 2021 at 08:41AM -06, Sam Hartman wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > So, it seems fairly obvious to me that Standards-Version is important
>> > for packa
control: clone -1 -2
control: reassign -2 debian-policy
control: retitle -2 Don't require Standards-Version field when only udebs
Hello,
On Thu 12 Aug 2021 at 11:47PM +02, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Sean Whitton (2021-08-12):
>> On Tue 27 Jul 2021 at 08:41AM -06, Sam Hartman wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > S
Processing control commands:
> clone -1 -2
Bug #991533 [lintian] lintian: please forget about required-field
Standards-Version for udeb packages
Bug #988911 [lintian] regression: claims that udebs require a Standards-Version
header
Failed to clone 991533: Bug is marked as being merged with other
Hi Sean,
Sean Whitton (2021-08-12):
> On Tue 27 Jul 2021 at 08:41AM -06, Sam Hartman wrote:
>
> >> "Cyril" == Cyril Brulebois writes:
> >
> > Cyril> Hi, Felix Lechner (2021-07-26):
> >
> > Cyril> cc-ing debian-policy@ for some possible feedback.
> >
> > Cyril> I'm not sure why
Hello kibi,
On Tue 27 Jul 2021 at 08:41AM -06, Sam Hartman wrote:
>> "Cyril" == Cyril Brulebois writes:
>
> Cyril> Hi, Felix Lechner (2021-07-26):
>
> Cyril> cc-ing debian-policy@ for some possible feedback.
>
> Cyril> I'm not sure why we should be spending time tracking down
>
Hello,
On Tue 27 Jul 2021 at 04:08AM +02, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Whatever happens on the debian-policy front (if anything), I'd prefer if
> lintian would stop emitting those errors on its own. It doesn't have to
> follow the letter of Policy, does it?
No, it doesn't. While the Lintian maintai
10 matches
Mail list logo
