Axel Beckert pushed to branch master at lintian / lintian
Commits:
78d9ec4f by Axel Beckert at 2023-01-17T08:06:55+01:00
bitbucket.org no more supports Mercurial
https://bitbucket.org/blog/sunsetting-mercurial-support-in-bitbucket
- - - - -
1 changed file:
- data/fields/vcs-hosters
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2023 01:37:56 +0100
Source: lintian
Architecture: source
Version: 2.116.0
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Lintian Maintainers
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2023 07:00:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#932634: fixed in lintian 2.116.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #932634,
regarding lintian: false-positive embedded-library libyaml due to matching
string (defined in data/binaries/embedded-libs) with
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2023 07:00:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1027399: fixed in lintian 2.116.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #1027399,
regarding lintian: misspelled spelling corrections
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2023 07:00:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1028975: fixed in lintian 2.116.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #1028975,
regarding allegedly, tar warnings are not errors
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2023 07:00:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1026920: fixed in lintian 2.116.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #1026920,
regarding New upstream version of file/libmagic breaks autopkgtest
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2023 07:00:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1025868: fixed in lintian 2.116.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #1025868,
regarding lintian autopkgtest fails on all but amd64: x86_64-linux-gnu expected
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2023 07:00:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1028274: fixed in lintian 2.116.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #1028274,
regarding lintian: Warning in processable […].dsc: Error open (<) on
'[…].orig.tar.gz.asc': No such file or directory at
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2023 07:00:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1027323: fixed in lintian 2.116.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #1027323,
regarding lintian: broken symlink reporting/harness
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2023 07:00:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1025436: fixed in lintian 2.116.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #1025436,
regarding lintian: Silence executable-stack-in-shared-library tag on mips*
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2023 07:00:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1025644: fixed in lintian 2.116.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #1025644,
regarding lintian: should not have the update-debian-copyright tag at all
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2023 07:00:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1025164: fixed in lintian 2.116.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #1025164,
regarding lintian: missing-prerequisite-for-pyproject-backend tag needs to
check Build-Depends-Indep too
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2023 07:00:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1024361: fixed in lintian 2.116.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #1024361,
regarding lintian: complains about bpo version when package built with
salsa-CI/pipeline (+salsaci)
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2023 07:00:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1016147: fixed in lintian 2.116.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #1016147,
regarding lintian: false positive missing-build-dependency-for-dh-addon python3
when using dh-sequence-python3
to be marked as
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2023 07:00:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1014956: fixed in lintian 2.116.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #1014956,
regarding More understandable text for inconsistent-appstream-metadata-license
tag
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2023 07:00:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1019851: fixed in lintian 2.116.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #1019851,
regarding lintian: init.d-script-needs-depends-on-lsb-base is obsolete + wrong
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2023 07:00:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1019541: fixed in lintian 2.116.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #1019541,
regarding lintian: New spelling corrections should be automatically checked
against an american and a british english dictionary
to
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2023 07:00:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1019235: fixed in lintian 2.116.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #1019235,
regarding lintian: 'licence' is not a misspelling
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2023 07:00:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1013314: fixed in lintian 2.116.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #1013314,
regarding lintian: REUSE license text should suppress
very-long-line-length-in-source-file
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2023 07:00:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1002053: fixed in lintian 2.116.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #1002053,
regarding lintian: false positive inconsistent-appstream-metadata-license
(gpl-2.0+ != gpl-2+)
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2023 07:00:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1006631: fixed in lintian 2.116.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #1006631,
regarding lintian: Recommend moving D-Bus policy files from /etc to /usr
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2023 07:00:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1014175: fixed in lintian 2.116.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #1014175,
regarding warning: cannot run debian/readme check on package
binary:postgresql-15_15~beta2-2+salsaci_amd64
to be marked as done.
SPDX itself might have an answer that is satisfactory:
"The original replaceable text appears on the SPDX License List webpage in red
text."
"Omittable text appears on the SPDX License List webpage in blue text."
Hi,
Soren Stoutner wrote:
> There appears to be some question of opinion
Not opinion. Just the point of what the meaning of _text colors_
*rollingeyes* in a license do mean. I just ignored them and then those
two licenses differ.
> as to if the Debian MIT (Expat) License is
> the same as the
lintian_2.116.0_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
lintian_2.116.0.dsc
lintian_2.116.0.tar.xz
lintian_2.116.0_source.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
There appears to be some question of opinion as to if the Debian MIT (Expat)
License is
the same as the SPDX MIT License.
https://www.debian.org/legal/licenses/mit[1]
https://spdx.org/licenses/MIT.html[2]
Can somebody at Debian Legal please comment?
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
Axel Beckert pushed new tag 2.116.0 at lintian / lintian
--
View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/tree/2.116.0
You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org.
Axel Beckert wrote:
> As mentioned before exactly that exception is the reason why I think
> that these two license texts are not the same. I though see no
> explanation what the meaning of the colors on the SPDX website is.
> Until that is clarified, for me, the two texts clearly differ for me.
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 + moreinfo
Bug #1029055 [lintian] lintian: Lintian does not recognize the AppStream's
metainfo.xml MIT license is the same as Debian's Expat license
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
1029055: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1029055
Debian Bug
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
Hi,
thanks for the separate bug report.
Soren Stoutner wrote:
> I just noticed that AppStream specifies that their licenses use the text
> listed by SPDX.
>
> As the text of the MIT License at https://spdx.org/licenses/MIT.html[1] is
> the same as the
> Debian MIT
I just noticed that AppStream specifies that their licenses use the text listed
by SPDX.
As the text of the MIT License at https://spdx.org/licenses/MIT.html[1] is the
same as the
Debian MIT License (Expat) at https://www.debian.org/legal/licenses/mit (except
for the
instructions in blue),
I created a new bug report to discuss this issue as the root cause ends up
being different than what was originally reported here.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1029055[1]
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
[1]
Package: lintian
Version: 2.115.3
Severity: wishlist
Debian has recently started requesting that graphical programs install
AppStream metainfo.xml files.
https://appstream.debian.org/sid/main/issues/electrum.html
The AppStream specification has a very restricted listed of possible licenses
Axel Beckert pushed to branch master at lintian / lintian
Commits:
861bcc1e by Axel Beckert at 2023-01-17T01:53:09+01:00
debian/control: Bump Standards-Version in Description to 4.6.2
Gbp-Dch: Ignore
- - - - -
abf85a66 by Axel Beckert at 2023-01-17T02:15:44+01:00
run-private-scripts.t: Do
Hi again,
Axel Beckert wrote:
> Close to doing an upload. So let's check:
>
> > > 1. it seems "t/scripts/run-private-scripts.t" is broken again?
> […]
> > That error seems to be a real error when calling
> > private/generate-tag-summary. So the error is not in
> > t/scripts/run-private-scripts.t
Package: lintian
Version: 2.115.4~git
Severity: wishlist
In
https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/merge_requests/390#note_367701
Willian Desportes (X-Debbugs-Cc'ed) suggested to implement the same as
Lintian MR !390 (GitHub and GitLab URLs shouldn't end with .git) also
for Vcs-Browser. With
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1013314 [lintian] lintian: REUSE license text should suppress
very-long-line-length-in-source-file
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1013314: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1013314
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Hi,
Axel Beckert wrote:
> Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Given we got no decision from the MIPS porters before the toolchain
> > freeze, we'll have to live with the executable stack on mips*el for
> > bookworm.
> >
> > Therefore I believe it's a good idea to disable that tag on mips*el on
> > the
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1025436 [lintian] lintian: Silence executable-stack-in-shared-library tag
on mips*
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1025436: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1025436
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Hi Aurelien,
your reply is just in time! Because about five minutes ago, I started
to continue working on Lintian for this evening. The plan: Making the
long overdue upload as I fixed the last part of arm64 autopkgtest
failures last night. :-)
Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Given we got no decision
Hi,
On 2023-01-16 13:26, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Mon, 2023-01-16 at 12:47:23 +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
> > Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > On 2022-10-26 22:09, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > > Note that the other official architecture still have a kernel
> > > > compatibility set to 3.2, so
Hi Axel,
On 15-01-2023 23:07, Axel Beckert wrote:
TL;DR:
[...]
You're awesome. And indeed, what a shame of your time.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi Soren,
Soren Stoutner wrote:
> On Sunday, January 15, 2023 5:17:10 PM MST Axel Beckert wrote:
> > > Debian, of course, prefers the Expat name as it is more precise.
> >
> > According to
> > https://wiki.debian.org/Proposals/CopyrightFormat#Differences_between_DEP5_a
> > nd_SPDX SPDX does not
On Sunday, January 15, 2023 5:17:10 PM MST Axel Beckert wrote:
> > Debian, of course, prefers the Expat name as it is more precise.
>
> According to
> https://wiki.debian.org/Proposals/CopyrightFormat#Differences_between_DEP5_a
> nd_SPDX SPDX does not have the Expat license. They do have though
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 + pending
Bug #1027399 [lintian] lintian: misspelled spelling corrections
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1027399 to the same tags previously set
--
1027399: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027399
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Control: tag -1 + pending
Hi Jakub,
Axel Beckert wrote:
> Jakub Wilk wrote:
> > I heard you like spell-checking, so I ran your spell-checker on your
> > spell-checker:
> >
> >$ grep '^[^#]' /usr/share/lintian/data/spelling/corrections | cut -d '|'
> > -f3 | sort -u | spellintian | grep -vF
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1027399 [lintian] lintian: misspelled spelling corrections
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1027399: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027399
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Hi!
On Mon, 2023-01-16 at 12:47:23 +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On 2022-10-26 22:09, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > Note that the other official architecture still have a kernel
> > > compatibility set to 3.2, so that will make a difference between
> > > architectures.
Hi,
writing this with my Lintian maintainer hat on. Nearly full quote due
to Cc'ing another bug report and bug reporter:
Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2022-10-26 22:09, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > control: tag -1 + moreinfo
> >
> > On 2022-10-25 21:07, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > > Package: libc6-dev
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 + confirmed pending
Bug #1027323 [src:lintian] lintian: broken symlink reporting/harness
Added tag(s) pending and confirmed.
--
1027323: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027323
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Control: tag -1 + confirmed pending
Hi Jakub,
Jakub Wilk wrote:
> $ file lintian-2.115.3/reporting/harness
> lintian-2.115.3/reporting/harness: broken symbolic link to ../frontend/dplint
Good find, thanks!
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert ,
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 + confirmed
Bug #1027399 [lintian] lintian: misspelled spelling corrections
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1027399: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027399
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 + confirmed
Hi Jakub,
Jakub Wilk wrote:
> I heard you like spell-checking, so I ran your spell-checker on your
> spell-checker:
>
>$ grep '^[^#]' /usr/share/lintian/data/spelling/corrections | cut -d '|'
> -f3 | sort -u | spellintian | grep -vF '(duplicate word)'
>
Hi,
I was pointed to the solution in the German Debian-Forum [1].
Please take this as a feature request. "groff-message" doesn't help to
know which commandline tool generated that error?
Depending on your docu [2] it seems to be "man" itself and not a tool
called "groff" or something else.
Axel Beckert pushed to branch master at lintian / lintian
Commits:
53f5b4d2 by William Desportes at 2023-01-16T02:54:14+00:00
Fix false positive for license-problem-php-license for pear.php.net source code
- - - - -
2 changed files:
- lib/Lintian/Check/Cruft.pm
-
55 matches
Mail list logo
