field in debian/control."
> ^
>
> You mean, it accesses the internet to check the URI?
Probably yes (since this report was three years ago... ;)
--
Regards,
Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/org
http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane
fonts
However, as https://packages.debian.org/en/sid/ says
"X Window System software
X servers, libraries, fonts, window managers, terminal emulators and
many related applications."
So, section x11 seems to include xfonts, not section fonts.
Which one is better?
--
Regards,
verity: important
Certainty: certain
Info: The distribution in the Changes field copied from
debian/changelog indicates that this package was not intended
to be released yet.
Ref: #542747
--
Hideki Yamane
thout enough thought).
master in git is "always" newer than the package in Debian repository.
So, I suggest you to change its color to other if package watches master
branch.
Maybe lintian would check it as warning or pedantic for this.
--
Regards,
Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.10.1
Severity: normal
Hi,
As Bug#677003, package building (dh_builddeb) with "-Sextreme" option
needs newer dpkg version than 1.16.2~ . see http://bugs.debian.org/677003
I hope lintian would warn this.
--
Regards,
Hideki Yamane henrich @ de
Ubuntu8.04 is still alive until 2013, Ubuntu10.04 is until 2015 too.
However, it's okay to tag this wontfix since it's reasonable.
--
Regards,
Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/org
http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lint-maint-requ..
Hi,
To improve Debian from lintian view, we should fix Errors first.
Now we have almost 2400 errors
>>E Errors: 2360 (-4)
And question is, how do we get this errors list?
--
Hideki Yamane
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lint-maint-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subj
eck packages' quality.
In my opinion, Quarity in Debian means three aspects.
1. of package
2. of upstream software
3. of whole distribution
lintian and piuparts can check "1" and measure it is important role
to know we are going to be better or not.
--
Regards,
keep
> driving the number up.
Yes, but there's a spike in error numbers if we would add new tags to Lintian.
So we can guess a trend with/without such new tags.
--
Regards,
Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/org
http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
Hi,
On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 11:26:30 +0200
Niels Thykier wrote:
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Do you still need more information for this wishlist bug?
--
Regards,
Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/org
http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lint-ma
Hi,
I've hit upon an idea, named "Lintian ratcheting" approach to improve
Debian packages.
see
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VZWGzccH_v9kbsjACRMhr0fgUllKqb1mmfWi7LkfE8A/edit?usp=sharing
Any comments are welcome.
--
Regards,
Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.
ot;pain". Not only in correctness of results
> (accuracy), but also in speed.
Well, ratcheting approach is just compare previous result (that is in
lintian.d.o) and current output. It doesn't make the situation worse.
--
Regards,
Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/
5
(snip)
Well, I've checked binary package and its permission is 0755, not 0775
as lintian says. I'm not sure it's bug or not. Do you have any information
for this check?
--
Hideki Yamane
d (also ascii key data is okay
as signing-key.asc).
So, lintian also check those files before warn to users, IMO.
--
Regards,
Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/org
http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lint-maint-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a sub
, git://anonscm.debian.org/pkg-nlp-ja/mecab-naist-jdic.git
was tried instead. Please update the Vcs field in debian/control."
Just checking Vcs-Git field and warn for using "git.debian.org"
(and maybe svn.debian.org for Vcs-Svn as well).
*) https://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/vcswatch
-
release
to not cause false-positive, at least.
--
Hideki Yamane
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lint-maint-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/CAPpVEmXBtkZu77XHHqjCekLERhniBu=w75sgp2-xzowbw4v...@mail.gmail.com
Package: lintian
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
Could you add sourceforge.jp as obsolete-sites, please? (since it was
renamed as osdn.jp) Here's a patch.
>From add0cbfd5081faaa4d444c66d15a7ce4dc88aa51 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Hideki Yamane
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2015 15:10:
les
http://www.mithril-linux.org/~henrich/debian/package/temp/
--
Regards,
Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/iijmio-mail.jp
http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lint-maint-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
nt specified for Gulim-Regular, defaulting to 0.
--
Regards,
Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/iijmio-mail.jp
http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane
pgpMhFAkmhjoY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Package: lintian
Version: 2.99.0
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Dear lintain Maintainers,
I've found a regression with lintian 2.99.0 and above, it reports as below
and failed with fonts-dejima-mincho package (simple font package).
+++ lintian output +++
su: warning: cannot change directory t
On Sun, 15 Nov 2020 16:59:06 +0900 Hideki Yamane wrote:
> Package: lintian
> Version: 2.99.0
> Severity: important
> Tags: patch
Add MergeRequest at
https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/merge_requests/342
(I'm not sure lintian test shows error at test stage)
--
Package: lintian
Version: 2.115.3
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
Checked non-free package r8125, lintian reports "unknown-field Autobuild"
that is set in debian/control file as below.
>> XS-Autobuild: yes
It would be better to not report as "unknown-field".
r there is any concern about uploading
such huge package or not.
Thank you.
--
Regards,
Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.org/iijmio-mail.jp
x27;s draft status). I'm not good at
Perl, so please review it when it's ready to merge.
Thank you.
*) https://lintian.debian.org/tags/patch-not-forwarded-upstream
--
Hideki Yamane
clock secs (16.58 usr 6.99 sys + 7916.42
> cusr 1489.12 csys = 9429.11 CPU)
> Result: FAIL
If you notice any issues or have questions, please let me know.
Thank you.
--
Hideki Yamane
ave Java8 as default JDK.
See http://java.debian.net/blog/2016/05/whats-new-since-jessie.html
- Java8 is default
- Java9 is not unknown version since it is in experimental now
So, we need to adjust it.
--
Hideki Yamane
Package: lintian
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi,
Please add one more obsolete hosting site check for fedorahosted.org.
Patch attached, could you check and apply it, please?
--
Hideki Yamane
From f9edf84467036667411dda43eccf3d68fc2c998d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Hideki Yamane
Date: Mon
Package: lintian
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
I heard about Microsoft's code hosting site codeplex.com will be shutdown,
so it's better to add a check to lintian for obsolete site. Patch, attached.
--
Regards,
Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/org
http://wiki.
Just you get source with apt-get source and debuild it, you'll
see same warning. The version of this package is ccstools_1.5.3-20080131-1,
it's uploaded at 2008-02-06.
--
Regards,
Hideki Yamane
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# I forgot to post this to BTS ;)
Hi Russ,
Thanks for your quick reply.
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:25:06 -0700
Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm afraid I don't. After getting the source and building it, I get the
> same lintian output as I get with the binary package currently in the
perl |
OR perl (>> 5.8) | 5.8.8-12
libparse-debianchangelog-perl (>= 0.6) | 1.1.1-2
liburi-perl | 1.35.dfsg.1-1
man-db(>= 2.3.20-1) | 2.5.1-3
rovides: libnums-ocaml, ocaml-base-nox-3.10.2
lintian requires ocaml-base-nox-3.10".0"
So we CANNOT satisfy what lintian says about dependency :(
I think lintian should not says about ocaml packages' names with version,
but only the generic names.
--
Regards,
Hideki Yamane
Package: lintian
Version: 2.2.5
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I've got a error message with lintian like below
>henr...@babytalk:~/src/2ch-browser/gnview$ lintian -v
>./gnview_0.8.11-1_i386.changes
>N: Setting up lab in /tmp/Mbne8gBwYW ...
>N: Processing
Package: lintian
Version: 2.2.6
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I've got errors from lintian
> dpkg-genchanges: including full source code in upload
> dpkg-buildpackage: full upload (original source is included)
> Now running lintian...
> Use of uninitialized
from Unix, last modified: Fri Jan
25 11:32:55 2008, max compression
- --
Regards,
Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/samba.gr.jp/iijmio-mail.jp
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable&
Package: lintian
Version: 1.23.46
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
This is minor issue.
linda has gone, so it would not need to say "SEE ALSO linda" in
its manpage, I think.
- --
Regards,
Hideki Yamane
-BEGIN PGP
36 matches
Mail list logo
