-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2018 13:29:37 +0100
Source: lintian
Binary: lintian
Architecture: source
Version: 2.5.77~bpo9+1
Distribution: stretch-backports
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Lintian Maintainers
Changed-By: Luca Falavigna
It seems this bug is triggered only when specifying another parameter
(e.g. --show-overrides).
The commit triggering this bug is
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=lintian/lintian.git;a=commitdiff;h=c3048a44a96c44929ce741f7b7db75ef9806b6c7
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lint-maint-requ...@
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.22
Severity: normal
it seems lintian no longer recognizes "--" parameter as end of parameters.
This behaviour happens since version 2.5.22.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lint-maint-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact list
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.22.1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
python-support is deprecated in favour of dh_python2, as per
http://packages.qa.debian.org/p/python-support/news/20110627T204800Z.html
The attached patch adds two new warnings checking whether the python-support is
listed as build-de
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.15
Severity: normal
dh_python has been removed from debhelper (see #717374),
dh_python-is-obsolete tag can be safely removed.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lint-maint-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.d
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.15
Severity: normal
python-central has been removed from both sid and jessie, so the following tags
will no longer be emitted, and can be safely removed:
* dh_pycentral-is-obsolete
* missing-dependency-on-python-central
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.12
Tags: patch
python-support is deprecated in favour of dh_python2, as per
http://packages.qa.debian.org/p/python-support/news/20110627T204800Z.html
The attached patch adds a new warning checking whether the
dh_pysupport helper is available in debian/rules.
This ch
It seems I omitted footnotes, here they are:
[0] http://code.google.com/p/waf/
[1] Yes, that phrase originates from the GPL, nevertheless Debian uses
it as definiton of "source".
[2] http://wiki.debian.org/UnpackWaf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lint-maint-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.4
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
After discussing the issue within the FTP Team, we came to the
conclusion that packages using waf build-system [0] in its current,
compressed form do not ship all sources in their prefered form of
modification [1].
A workaround has bee
Package: lintian
Version: 2.3.3
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
As announced in [1], I prepared a patch implementing a new tag called
empty-binary-package, which tries to catch empty binary packages which
are not meta-packages or transitional packages.
I also provided a patch for devref [2] asking
a way to denote such packages.
Also done as per #569219 [2].
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=569220
[2] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=569219
--
.''`.
: :' : Luca Falavigna
`. `'
`-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ers about their
"meta" status, so they can be eventually removed.
Waiting for your thoughts and suggestions (please keep me CCed) :)
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2010/02/msg00154.html
[2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2010/02/msg00164.html
[3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-d
tags 551793 + patch
thanks
Here's a patch which implements required feature.
Regards,
--
.''`.
: :' : Luca Falavigna
`. `'
`-
diff --git a/checks/control-file b/checks/control-file
index 180be7c..e73a436 100644
--- a/checks/control-file
+++ b/checks/contr
13 matches
Mail list logo
