Russ Allbery wrote:
> Raphael Geissert
> writes:
>
>> I found a difference on the results of the file-info parsing:
>>
>> diff --git a/t1 b/t2
>> index 14783a7..1e3fbb1 100644
>> --- a/t1
>> +++ b/t2
>> @@ -648,4 +648,4 @@ unit_tests/
ease let me know if there is
> anything else I could do to help debugging this.
there might be several, unknown?, reasons why it can or can not be
reproduced.
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
file-info.mbox
Description: application/mbox
Russ Allbery wrote:
> Raphael Geissert writes:
>
>> --- a/lib/Lintian/Command.pm
>> +++ b/lib/Lintian/Command.pm
>> @@ -303,7 +303,7 @@ all the executions of kill_kill.
>> =cut
>>
>> sub kill {
>> -my $status;
>> +my $status = 0;
&g
rther errors)
>
> I think the "commmand failed with error code 123" issue has been reported
> before already, but the uninitialized value in line 308 seems new.
The "command failed..." error was supposed to be fixed in 2.2.8, but looks
like something is missing.
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Russ Allbery wrote:
>
>> Raphael Geissert writes:
>>> Russ Allbery wrote:
>>>> I thought I responded to your patch with the specific details of what
>>>> else needs to be done, and I hadn't seen a further response af
Russ Allbery wrote:
> Raphael Geissert writes:
>> Russ Allbery wrote:
>
>>> I'm not sure about this one, honestly. I think there's something to be
>>> said about the simplicity of this mapping, and we do make the
>>> additional informatio
Russ Allbery wrote:
> Raphael Geissert writes:
>
>> Before I move into the main topic of this mail: is there any plan to
>> participate in GSoC 2009?
>
> I don't have any time to be a mentor or to put together project ideas. I
> think it would be great if some
s? suggestions? are those goals feasible?
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lint-maint-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Now that I think about it, the lab version should have been bumped when the
changes to unpack-src-l1 were made :-/
Sorry for the mess.
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lint-maint-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
IMO should be "fixed" by replacing variables with glob
masks
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lint-maint-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
ould have been run before the
upload.
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lint-maint-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> debhelper compatibility level V5 is now deprecated
s/V5/V4
The code change is fine, the changelog and commit entries are not :)
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lint-main
Hi,
Looking around at the different documentation files I noticed there were
some bits missing. Attached mbox should bring them up to date.
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
lintian-doc.mbox
Description: application/mbox
are asking on #-devel and #-mentors what to do due to the
install* checks so I think they should be addressed ASAP.
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lint-maint-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "uns
nce a single write.
I've tried to reproduce that bug with a test with over one thousand files
but only managed to reproduce it a couple of times.
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lint-maint-requ...@list
Package: lintian
Version: 2.2.6
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Hi,
Here are some of the findings while trying to test for the error messages of
failing collection scripts.
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
lintian-gzip.mbox
Description: application
t and found some bugs while at it, will file the reports
in a moment. But error reporting seems to be working fine:
warning: collect info strings about package binaries-embedded-zlib failed
warning: skipping check of binary package binaries-embedded-zlib
(added an exit 1 on collection/scripts)
Che
t;
I missed that one; surprisingly enough it anyway passed the whole test
suite.
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lint-maint-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
wanted to do for a while. Then we won't need
> those extra use libs that are easy to forget and will be closer to having
> a real module structure.
>
Sure.
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d
;> || m/GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE\s+Version 1/
>> || m/compatible\s+with\s+(?:the\s+)?(?:GNU\s+)?GPL/
>
> The real problem is that the existing regex didn't match this particular
> reference. I'm taking a look now.
>
OK :)
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Deb
Russ Allbery wrote:
> Raphael Geissert writes:
>
>> # info already available?
>> -next if (-e "$base/$ci->{'output'}");
>> +next if (-l "$base/.${coll}$ci->{'version'}");
>> +system('sh&
tag 516687 patch
thanks
Attached mbox should do it.
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
lintian-gfdl.mbox
Description: application/mbox
the collection scripts based on their deps. This would also allow
us to start moving bits out of unpack/unpack-* and in to collection/ scripts.
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
lintian-fine-grained_collection.mbox
Description: application/mbox
Package: lintian
Version: 2.2.6
Tags: patch
Hi,
While making some changes I ran the whole test suite and failed on the
binaries-from-other-arch test because of some changes now in testing's
objdump.
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
li
Russ Allbery wrote:
> Raphael Geissert writes:
>
>> When a collection script is modified, the changes are not reflected even
>> if the same package is re-unpacked or re-processed. This could lead to
>> certain temporary miss behaviours.
>
> That's why you
Russ Allbery wrote:
> Raphael Geissert writes:
>
>> None of these require my previous changes to be applied, but would be
>> great if the others could be applied as well.
>
> I applied the first patch. For the move of common_data, I agree that this
> is an improve
Russ Allbery wrote:
> Raphael Geissert writes:
[...]
>
>> Do you handle that one?
>
> Not at the moment. I have lots of other things I want to work on first.
>
Implemented, see attached mbox.
[...]
>
> The proof-of-concept looks like a reasonable approach. I had
touch the .$collection_script$version file.
* Skip a collection script if the .$collection_script$version file exists.
If it is fine I'll implement it.
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lint-maint-requ...@l
st nor in the BTS, so attaching it now/again.
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
lintian_necf.mbox
Description: application/mbox
I'm afraid your message didn't make it to the newsgroup provided by gmane; so
it is until now that I'm reading your email.
On Sunday 08 February 2009 21:11:20 Russ Allbery wrote:
> Raphael Geissert writes:
> > There might indeed be a degradation on those texts where the
s file from and encode that information into the
> index.
>
Ok; attached mbox contains it all. Please beware that I haven't tested the
latest change (I don't have a local mirror, and my personal repository is
partially broken).
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
Hi,
As just pointed out by pabs on IRC.
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
lintian_js.mbox
Description: application/mbox
On what indices should the area be specified? would bin and udebs be more
than enough?
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lint-maint-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
ouch).
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
lintian_libtool.mbox
Description: application/mbox
this a
> section or category to call it an archive area instead, which is the
> terminology used by the Social Contract and in the next version of Policy,
> but that can be done later.)
>
Cloned :)
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
Bill W
tag 516530 patch
thanks
Attached mbox should do it.
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
lintian_sections.mbox
Description: application/mbox
tag 318104 patch
thanks
Attached mbox contains the necessary changes.
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
lintian_zlib.mbox
Description: application/mbox
Russ Allbery wrote:
> Raphael Geissert
> writes:
>
>>> +exists($archselftable{$arch}) or warn("Unknown architecture $arch");
>>> +
>>
>> argh; there should be two exceptions: all and lpia.
>
> Oh, thanks. I just got all sepearately. Sho
[...]
>
> +exists($archselftable{$arch}) or warn("Unknown architecture $arch");
> +
argh; there should be two exceptions: all and lpia.
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lint-maint-requ.
Hi everyone,
Now that lenny is out even oldstable (i.e. etch) has an lsb-base > 3.0-6
Am I right to assume that this bug should therefor be closed?
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lint-maint-r
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lint-maint-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
t;Internal error: \$mode has unknown value: $mode";
replace die with fail, and use Utils (fail);
Once the check is merged in 'scripts' [^#] won't be needed anymore.
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debi
Hi all,
None of these require my previous changes to be applied, but would be great
if the others could be applied as well.
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
lintian_profil3.mbox
Description: application/mbox
lintian_reorg.mbox
Description
Hi Frank,
Nice to see you around :)
2009/2/21 Frank Lichtenheld :
[...]
>
> lintian -v might be helpful.
>
-v isn't helpful at all, only -d is a bit more, but the issue is a bit
obscure. Attached is the output of -d on just a subset of the
packages.
Cheers,
--
Raphael Gei
Some other optimisations and a new check/bug fix, found by somebody in
#debian-mentors
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
lintian-copyright_license_typo.mbox
Description: application/mbox
lintian-data_optim.mbox
Description: application/mbox
merge 236534 513996
tag 513996 patch
thanks
On Tuesday 03 February 2009 02:15:15 Russ Allbery wrote:
> Raphael Geissert writes:
> > While working on the check for prebuilt binaries in source tarballs I
> > was thinking about making it severity: minor as having prebuilt binaries
-dependency-on-libc needed by ./usr/bin/kgb
There are 16 debs in deb/ one has a different version than the others.
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lint-maint-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubs
ather add an override
> instead?
>
>
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lint-maint-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
That reminds me of a change I saw it was needed the other day.
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
lintian-lzma.mbox
Description: application/mbox
Russ Allbery wrote:
> Raphael Geissert writes:
>> Russ Allbery wrote:
>
>>> You have to run strings -a if you're going to implement that, at which
>>> point I think chances are pretty high that you're going to get false
>>> positives from the
Russ Allbery wrote:
> Raphael Geissert writes:
>
>> At least the collection scripts could be run in parallel. All the
>> collection scripts with the same Order should run in parallel just fine,
>> and once the dependencies are done or all the scripts of the same Order
&
Russ Allbery wrote:
> Raphael Geissert writes:
>
>> Attached mbox contains patches adding a collection script to gather the
>> output of the 'strings' command on the ELF binaries of a package, and
>> spell checks its output. The collection script is also ne
t
just "looks like" one, but anything under tests.* could indeed be ignored.
I'll leave that up the maintainers :)
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lint-maint-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
ase of gzip nor bzip2 there is no reason
to do it for lzma.
As I'm not a lintian maintainer I'm not marking this bug as blocked by
#347636 (bug report against tar asking for lzma auto detection, CC'ed), as
there is another solution: manually set --lzma if needed.
Cheers,
--
Raphael G
elf files without having to look for them in the
file-info index. Maybe it should die if nobody finds a use for it.
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
lintian-binaries_spelling.mbox
Description: application/mbox
signature.asc
Description: This is a
tag 509624 patch
thanks
Whatever the final severity is, attached patch implements it. Right now I'm
lacking good arguments for the tag description, so it needs to be improved.
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
lintian-icons.mbox
Descri
"C"?
another possibility would be to print them as "N" with some sort of format
that harness could identify and parse.
Suggestions? Comments?
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
ating Tag and its second read of all the tag metadata by merging it
> into the new Lintian::Tag::Info module. I'm slowly working on that.
>
Sure. I already tried to remove the add_tag and display_tags from
frontend/lintian; but I ended up with something useless.
Cheers,
--
Raphael Ge
normal fit better?
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lint-maint-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Raphael Geissert wrote:
[...]
> I just started to optimise the code, reduce number of calls, etc based on
> the profiling data (by moving some code I reduced over 2k function calls).
> Will send some patches tomorrow.
>
Attached is the first set.
We could speed up lintian a
Russ Allbery wrote:
> Raphael Geissert writes:
>> Russ Allbery wrote:
[...]
>> I remember seeing the other day some unneeded files being generated at
>> unpack level 1 of binary packages.
>
> More detail would be good. The only things that level 1 unpack of binary
&
/Lintian/Collect/Binary.pm
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ use base 'Lintian::Collect';
use Carp qw(croak);
use Util;
+use Lintian::Relation;
# Initialize a new binary package collect object. Takes the package name,
# which is currently unused.
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintai
Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Russ Allbery wrote:
> [...]
>>
>> Have you benchmarked this? My intuition says that if this makes any
>> difference at all, it will be a performance *degredation*. You're now
>> walking the entire text for every typo we know abo
Attached mbox should do it. I had some problems with perl not liking 'unless
($seen{$pkg} lt 2 or ...', but I used a workaround.
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
lintian-virtual_packages.mbox
Description: application/mbox
.dfsg.1-1+lenny2_i386.deb
[...]
real0m6.311s
user0m5.456s
sys 0m0.600s
(xlintian is an alias to lintian from my git repo).
As you can see with the patch it is faster.
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
tag 127494 patch
thanks
Attached mbox implements both parts. Maybe the check should later be extended
to look for stuff other than ELF an PE objects.
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
lintian-src_binaries.mbox
Description: application/mbox
archive,
and the patch in the attached mbox does exactly that.
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
lintian-virtual_packages.mbox
Description: application/mbox
Package: lintian
Version: 2.2.1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi,
This bug gave me something to do for over an hour, when change "caused" the
failure of some unrelated tests.
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
lintian-rsync_fix.mbox
D
ssions and other operations so that
> they are performed once for all the text, instead of doing it once on every
> word.
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
lintian-spelling_optim.mbox
Description: application/mbox
Hi,
Some more typos.
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
lintian-spelling.mbox
Description: application/mbox
>
I don't think that using "You" in a description is ok (not even
lowercase "you", but that would be too picky); but I won't object to try to
reach a concensus about it.
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
-
clone 513053 -1
retitle 513053 [checks/descriptions] include
first-word-of-sentences-too-repetitive
tag 513053 moreinfo
thanks
Russ Allbery wrote:
> Raphael Geissert writes:
>
>> I originally used severity: normal, but later was unsure about the
>> severity because if I fi
or less lintian
clean (say less than 10 tags) should try --pedantic at least once every now
and then to see what it reports and think about those issues. "You decide,
but take a look anyway" would be the right slogan.
[...]
>
> Upcoming Work
> =
>
[...]
> R
Russ Allbery wrote:
> Raphael Geissert writes:
>
>> Attached are two mboxs, one adds a some more words to Spelling.pm;
>
> Applied.
Thanks
>
>> the other mbox contains the necessary changes to generate an index of
>> the source package, and file-index.
>
something when I wrote the check.
>
> I think that, if feasible, this test should not compare the content of
> udeb packages with the content of deb packages.
>
Attached mbox contains the patch.
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
think about how to be friendly to the kernel's file caching,
to speed lintian up. Because the more checks are added, the more info is
collected, the more it slows down.
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
lintian_spelling.mbox
Description: applic
f topic, shouldn't the source-contains-* checks better be
severity: pedantic? There's no much maintainers can do about those but
repack the tarball and/or bug upstream, not to mention that they usually
don't affect the final .deb and when they do another check should catch
didn't see the tar ones. I don't know how we could suppress
those, maybe a bug report against those packages is the only option, as tar
doesn't seem to have a "ultra-quiet" option (and even if it had, it doesn't
sound like the best solution here).
Cheers,
--
Raphael G
arch directories should be ignored, but I can't
think about any good reason to for example ship an i386 binary in an armel
package.
Oh, and by implementing such a check I would not need to rise the severity of
the other check, not to mention that it isn't the right thing to do :).
Chee
[No need to CC me]
2009/2/2 Evgeni Golov :
> On Mon, 02 Feb 2009 12:26:37 -0600 Raphael Geissert wrote:
>
>> >
>> > I suspect there's still arguably a bug in such a package, since this would
>> > imply that the upstream license statement wasn't cut and
his tag isn't the
> right one to apply. So this patch looks good to me. I'll go ahead and
> apply it.
>
Yes, and a new check should be implemented.
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lint-maint-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
ad side-effects when checking the source
package.
Well, I guess this bug should then be closed, don't you think?
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lint-maint-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "
Package: lintian
Version: 2.2.0
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Attached is an mbox containing several bug fixes, found thanks to lintian.log
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
lintian_lintian.d.o_bugfixes.mbox
Description: application/mbox
that you expected to produce
> errors which didn't?
Yes, attached changelog files is the culprit.
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
batv-milter (0.3.0.dfsg-2) unstable; urgency=high
* Build depend on m4 (FTBFS)Closes: #505755
-- Rich
'debfiles/changelog',
'5',
'couldn\'t parse date Mon, 29 Dec 2008 85:45:00 -'
]]
},
'data' => [
bless( {
[...]
'Date' => 'Mon, 29 Dec 2008 85:45:00 -',
esent, I think we should still warn with severity: pedantic, since I
> think the user should still be pointing to the version of the GPL stated
> in the license, not some random later version.
Attached mbox implements the checks. I checked the regex against lots of the
installed packages a
Russ Allbery wrote:
> Raphael Geissert writes:
>
>> So, what's the way to go here?
>
>> severity:minor when no "or any later version" is used? and
>> severity:pedantic when it is?
>> Or just the former with the severity of the latter?
>
>>
nts-i386.gz \
> -| perl -n -w -E 'print lc $_ if
> (s#^.+/([\w-]+\.(?:[to]tf|pfb|pcf))\s+\w+/([to]tf.+)$#$1=$2#i);' \
> -| sort > fonts
> -
> -mv fonts "$lintian_data/files/"
> +| perl -n -w -E 'print lc $_ if
> (s,^.+/([\w-]+\.(?:
I'm too sleepy or
there's no way to do it via the standard options of ls or find.
The file index is necessary for #512265 and #472219 too.
Any hints?
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lint-maint-requ
On Sunday 31 August 2008 23:20:32 Russ Allbery wrote:
> Raphael Geissert writes:
> > The following snippet is pretty common and always, IMHO, wrong:
> >> On Debian systems, the complete text of the GNU General
> >> Public License can be found in `/usr/share/common-licen
ompromise between accuracy (or rather number of false negatives)
and speed.
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lint-maint-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
It only sort of belongs in cruft; it's
> different than what the rest of that check does.
That sounds like a good idea :).
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lint-maint-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
te.
What do you think?
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
iner I'm leaving the report open, although IMO there's
nothing to change here (and the tag description sounds fine).
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lint-maint-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
ertainty and reduces the number of false
> positives by not expecting X from X-dbg to actually exist.
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
lintian_dbg-rework.mbox
Description: application/mbox
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Raphael Geissert wrote:
>
> Theory:
> mkdir bin
> ln -s /bin/true bin/gpg
> PATH="bin:$PATH"
Implemented in the patch included in the mbox.
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
harness_gpg.mbox
Description: application/mbox
Russ Allbery wrote:
> Raphael Geissert writes:
>
>> On a partially unrelated topic, what about disabling the pgp/gpg
>> signature check on lintian.d.o? it just consumes time and space in
>> lintian.log and won't find anything without the keyrings and gpg setup.
&g
d
anything without the keyrings and gpg setup.
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lint-maint-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
a more wide diversity of words.
> In case you have troubles with it an email to the english i18n mailing
> list should help.
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
lintian_descriptions.mbox
Description: application/mbox
t's doing those.
I just took a quick look at the source-related checks and didn't find much, just
some unused global variables and an unused pm. The attached mbox contains the
patches reflecting the cleanup.
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintai
601 - 700 of 872 matches
Mail list logo
