Re: [Draft] Bits from the lintian maintainers

2011-08-13 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2011-08-12 18:03, Russ Allbery wrote: Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net writes: Other improvements == These days Lintian ^^^ (Fixed a typo, thanks to Jakub Wilk) * processes related packages together Since 2.5.0~rc3 Lintian has grouped related

[Draft] Bits from the lintian maintainers

2011-08-12 Thread Niels Thykier
Hi See attached document; comments welcome :) ~Niels Topics: - Vendor profiles - Configuration file changes - Changes to Lintian options - Other improvements - Known bugs and issues - Help us help you Vendor Profiles === Starting with version 2.5.2, Lintian can now be

Re: [Draft] Bits from the lintian maintainers

2011-08-12 Thread Russ Allbery
Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net writes: * processes related packages together Since 2.5.0~rc3 Lintian has grouped related packages and processed them together. With this Lintian can now do things like check if a manpage is in a direct dependency. ...in a direct dependency

Re: [Draft] Bits from the lintian maintainers

2011-08-12 Thread Jeremiah Foster
On Aug 12, 2011, at 18:03, Russ Allbery wrote: Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net writes: This otherwise looks great to me. And on a personal note, thank you *so* much for all the work that you've been doing on Lintian. I've often had the experience with other open source projects of

Re: [Draft] Bits from the lintian maintainers

2011-08-12 Thread Russ Allbery
Jeremiah Foster jerem...@jeremiahfoster.com writes: I've got a question regarding the various lintian modules. I'm a command line person and often use tools like perldoc to read the documentation that is in with code. Lintian does seem to use plain old documentation very much which I think is

Re: [Draft] Bits from the lintian maintainers

2011-08-12 Thread Jeremiah C. Foster
On Aug 12, 2011, at 21:36, Jeremiah Foster wrote: I've got a question regarding the various lintian modules. I'm a command line person and often use tools like perldoc to read the documentation that is in with code. Lintian does seem to use I meant doesn't of course. :} plain old

Re: DRAFT: Bits from the Lintian maintainers

2009-12-31 Thread Joey Hess
Russ Allbery wrote: debhelper and didn't have this dependency will now get a warning. We're currently deciding whether to teach Lintian that ${misc:Depends} isn't needed in this specific case or to just uniformly recommend the ${misc:Depends} dependency for all packages using debhelper. The

Re: DRAFT: Bits from the Lintian maintainers

2009-12-31 Thread Russ Allbery
Joey Hess jo...@debian.org writes: Russ Allbery wrote: debhelper and didn't have this dependency will now get a warning. We're currently deciding whether to teach Lintian that ${misc:Depends} isn't needed in this specific case or to just uniformly recommend the ${misc:Depends} dependency for

DRAFT: Bits from the Lintian maintainers

2009-12-30 Thread Russ Allbery
[ Any mistakes, or anything else I should mention? ] New Team Member === The best news about Lintian is that Raphael Geissert has joined the team as an additional Lintian maintainer. Raphael has been making suggestions and contributing patches to Lintian since 2007 and has done a

Re: DRAFT: Bits from the Lintian maintainers

2009-12-30 Thread Raphael Geissert
Russ Allbery wrote: [ Any mistakes, or anything else I should mention? ] What about including the usual we welcome more contributors? :) New Team Member === The best news about Lintian is that Raphael Geissert has joined the team as an additional Lintian maintainer. Heh,

Re: DRAFT: Bits from the Lintian maintainers

2009-02-08 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 19:04 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: [ This is a draft of a post I'd like to send to debian-devel-announce. Take a look and let me know if anything is wrong or missing. Thanks! ] Thanks for that; I don't have think I have anything specific to add that wasn't on Raphael's

Re: DRAFT: Bits from the Lintian maintainers

2009-02-08 Thread Russ Allbery
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes: (fwiw, I've never really liked as good of a blah, but that could be an en_US vs en_GB thing). No, you're right, it's a sloppy construct. I reworded it. We're also looking for someone who would like to tackle converting the Lintian manual in

Re: DRAFT: Bits from the Lintian maintainers

2009-02-07 Thread Raphael Geissert
Russ Allbery wrote: [ This is a draft of a post I'd like to send to debian-devel-announce. Take a look and let me know if anything is wrong or missing. Thanks! ] Current Status == [...] Maybe it should be mentioned how many checks there were in etch's lintian, how many in

DRAFT: Bits from the Lintian maintainers

2009-02-06 Thread Russ Allbery
[ This is a draft of a post I'd like to send to debian-devel-announce. Take a look and let me know if anything is wrong or missing. Thanks! ] Current Status == Since the lenny freeze began, we've been working on incorporating major changes in preparation for squeeze, including (as

Re: DRAFT: Bits from the Lintian maintainers

2008-03-13 Thread Russ Allbery
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: FWIW, two years ago (?) Jeroen, djpig and I had a discussion about this. The basic idea back then was the same as you describe now: Move away from E, W and I and use two letters to indicate the two different measurements are represented: (i)

Re: DRAFT: Bits from the Lintian maintainers

2008-03-12 Thread Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: * Provide a way to more clearly indicate Lintian's certainty, the severity of the problem, and the source of the rule that Lintian is checking, rather than always collapsing that information into a simple three-level error/warning/info hierarchy.