On Monday, April 25, 2016 02:07:01 AM Luca Filipozzi wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 09:55:10AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > Do you have some concrete suggestions?
>
> Decrease the separation by moving the funds management into Debian proper
> (via a TO like SPI) and move to a bounty model
On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 09:55:10AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Do you have some concrete suggestions?
Decrease the separation by moving the funds management into Debian proper (via
a TO like SPI) and move to a bounty model for working on LTS. Make sure we're
transparent with our language
On Sun, 2016-04-24 at 22:24 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 09:45 +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
> >
> > Am 18.04.2016 um 08:45 schrieb Guido Günther:
> > [...]
> > >
> > >
> > > I'm all for it (although it's easy to say for me since the most burden
> > > will probably be on
On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 09:45 +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Am 18.04.2016 um 08:45 schrieb Guido Günther:
> [...]
> >
> > I'm all for it (although it's easy to say for me since the most burden
> > will probably be on the kernel team) and having it as experimental with
> > a single sponsor seems
Hi everybody,
I uploaded version 1.8.13.1~dfsg1-3+deb7u4 of asterisk to:
https://people.debian.org/~alteholz/packages/wheezy-lts/asterisk/amd64/
https://people.debian.org/~alteholz/packages/wheezy-lts/asterisk/i386/
Please give it a try and tell me about any problems you met.
Thanks!
On Wed, 2016-04-13 at 21:51 +1000, Brian May wrote:
[...]
> (dvswitch)
[...]
This is known to be broken with newer libav and has not been fixed
upstream. (I think I was able to make it build, but it then crashed at
run-time.) Definitely a candidate for removal.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 09:55:10AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > https://wiki.debian.org/LTS/ makes it appear that LTS is an official Debian
> > effort.
>
> And it is. There are multiple Debian developers who have initiated this
> project, have been organizing it on
On 04/24/2016 09:55 AM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
As a Debian developer (and not only as a freelancer/company owner) I do
care about Debian LTS because it is important for Debian's long term
relevance (at least according to me).
An off-topic: As a Debian user (not a developer/programmer, at
Hi,
thanks for the feedback.
On Sat, 23 Apr 2016, Julien Cristau wrote:
> I think one of the contentious points is how "Freexian raising funds to
> work on Debian LTS" is already too close to calling itself "Debian LTS
> fundraising", so I'm not sure bringing them closer would alleviate
>
