I uploaded a snapshot of the jessie-security branch of linux, with the
version 3.16.65-1~git20190405.c586826, to people.debian.org:
https://people.debian.org/~benh/packages/jessie-security/
There are source and binaries for amd64 and i386, along with a signed
.changes file.
Let me know if you
Package: samba
Version: 2:4.2.14+dfsg-0+deb8u12
CVE ID : CVE-2017-9461 CVE-2018-1050 CVE-2018-1057 CVE-2019-3880
Various vulnerabilities were discovered in Samba, SMB/CIFS file, print,
and login server/client for Unix
CVE-2017-9461
smbd in Samba had a denial of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2019 23:50:58 +0200
Source: samba
Binary: samba samba-libs samba-common samba-common-bin smbclient
samba-testsuite registry-tools libparse-pidl-perl samba-dev samba-doc
python-samba samba-dsdb-modules
On Tuesday 09 April 2019 03:09 AM, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Am 08.04.19 um 21:51 schrieb Salvatore Bonaccorso:
>> Hi LTS contributors,
>>
>> Recently I noticed that for a no-dsa (either for no-dsa or the
>> stronger ignored) as explanation was started to be used e.g. "not used
>> by any
Hi,
On 09/04/2019 09:50, Ingo Wichmann wrote:
> labeling it "minor issues" when the real reason is "sponsors needed"
> sounds wrong to me.
That's never been the real reason so far AFAICS, only a complementary
reason.
[jessie] - libpodofo (DoS, not used by any sponsor)
[jessie] -
Hi Hugo,
"funding needed" is OK to me, too.
But to me, the packages that we're talking about are "orphaned in LTS".
To change that, we need a Debian Maintainer to pick that package, fix it
and upload it.
Maybe that Debian Maintainer needs funding, maybe not. But still
"funding needed" would be
Hi Ingo,
> labeling it "minor issues" when the real reason is "sponsors needed"
> sounds wrong to me.
>
> I'd say "minor issues" is right for minor issues. And "sponsors needed"
> is a legitimate, helpful additional information.
>
> It seems to me, that it's not uncommon to Debian to search for
Hi,
labeling it "minor issues" when the real reason is "sponsors needed"
sounds wrong to me.
I'd say "minor issues" is right for minor issues. And "sponsors needed"
is a legitimate, helpful additional information.
It seems to me, that it's not uncommon to Debian to search for a sponsor
of a
Holger Levsen writes:
> ERROR: .data or .wml file missing for DLA 0015-1
> ERROR: .data or .wml file missing for DLA 0014-1
> ERROR: .data or .wml file missing for DLA 0013-1
> ERROR: .data or .wml file missing for DLA 0012-1
> ERROR: .data or .wml file missing for DLA 0011-1
> ERROR: .data or
Brian May writes:
> Ok, so it does sound like I should make this change too.
Updated patch attached.
--
Brian May
diff -Nru libvirt-1.2.9/debian/changelog libvirt-1.2.9/debian/changelog
--- libvirt-1.2.9/debian/changelog 2018-03-13 06:51:52.0 +1100
+++ libvirt-1.2.9/debian/changelog
> If LTS is meant as Debian project, then I would suggest not to start
> to use those formulations, which I think are fine for ELTS, which is a
> dedicated project not on Debian directly. Saying something is not DSA
> worthy or is going to be ignored, because it's not used by a LTS
> sponsor will
Guido Günther writes:
> I don't think this is needed for jessie since the corresponding function
> in qemu was implemented in 4.8.0.
Sounds like it won't hurt to leave this in, in any case...
> qemuDomainGetTime is present in 1.2.9 and uses the guest agent so it's
> affected as well. The
Hi Brian,
On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 07:38:19AM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> Holger Levsen writes:
>
> > ERROR: .data or .wml file missing for DLA 1750-1
> > ERROR: .data or .wml file missing for DLA 1730-2
> > ERROR: .data or .wml file missing for DLA 719-1
> > ERROR: .data or .wml file missing for
13 matches
Mail list logo
