Re: Report for my LTS work in December 2023

On 2/9/24 8:17 PM, Holger Levsen wrote: src:debian-security-support: - #1061268: ending security support for chromium in bullseye Hi, Does it mean that chromium in bullseye will not be updated anymore? Regards, Misko

Re: [SECURITY] [DLA 3452-1] thunderbird security update

On 6/12/2023 11:38 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 - - Debian LTS Advisory DLA-3452-1debian-lts@lists.debian.org https://www.debian.org/lts/security/

Re: Cannot read newsgroups with new Thunderbird

On 10/16/22 3:10 PM, Pascal Hambourg wrote: On 16/10/2022 at 13:28, Miroslav Skoric wrote: On 10/15/22 9:50 AM, Pascal Hambourg wrote: As found on a newsgroup, setting mailnews.nntp.jsmodule=false fixed the issue. As I am not a programmer, where can I find & fix that line? Tnx.

Re: Cannot read newsgroups with new Thunderbird

On 10/15/22 9:50 AM, Pascal Hambourg wrote: On 14/10/2022 at, I wrote: On 14/10/2022 at 11:08, Miroslav Skoric wrote: Thank you for comment. Unfortunately, I do not have any machine running bullseye or bookworm, so I cannot test it myself. Hope someone will do. I use thunderbird with

Re: Cannot read newsgroups with new Thunderbird

Debian LTS Team On 05/10/2022 15:17, Miroslav Skoric wrote: After a recent Thunderbird upgrade in Buster (from version 91-something to 101-something, or like), it stopped handling newsgroups properly (where the source is News Server (NNTP) on the same machine, and there nothing was changed/u

Cannot read newsgroups with new Thunderbird

After a recent Thunderbird upgrade in Buster (from version 91-something to 101-something, or like), it stopped handling newsgroups properly (where the source is News Server (NNTP) on the same machine, and there nothing was changed/upgraded). To be precise, Thunderbird now seems downloading new

Re: [SECURITY] [DLA 2880-1] firefox-esr security update

On 1/17/22 11:44 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: On 16/01/2022 23:49, Miroslav Skoric wrote: On 1/16/22 11:55 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 - - Debian LTS Advisory

Re: [SECURITY] [DLA 2880-1] firefox-esr security update

On 1/16/22 11:55 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 - - Debian LTS Advisory DLA-2880-1debian-lts@lists.debian.org https://www.debian.org/lts/security/

Re: [SECURITY] [DLA 2880-1] firefox-esr security update

On 1/16/22 11:55 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 - - Debian LTS Advisory DLA-2880-1debian-lts@lists.debian.org https://www.debian.org/lts/security/

Re: Bug#953950: python-twisted: twisted version 14.0.2-3+deb8u1 in jessie (security) is broken

On 3/19/2020 11:00 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: One 'specific reason' to stay with an older release is that almost any new release requires newer hardware (i.e. stops supporting some hardware that was supported by the older release). Linux upstream is super conservative with dropping support

Re: Bug#953950: python-twisted: twisted version 14.0.2-3+deb8u1 in jessie (security) is broken

On 3/19/20 1:01 PM, Simon McVittie wrote: If you do not have a specific reason to stay on Debian 8 'jessie', also consider upgrading to Debian 9 'stretch', and then from there to Debian 10 'buster', which is the current stable release. Hi, One 'specific reason' to stay with an older release

Re: jessie-updates gone

On 4/2/19 12:59 PM, Andy Smith wrote: Hi Miroslav, On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 11:53:50AM +0200, Miroslav Skoric wrote: On 4/1/19 8:14 PM, Andy Smith wrote: I do understand that re-adding an empty jessie-updates directory will silence a lot of warnings from apt update, and thus would avoid the

Re: jessie-updates gone

On 4/1/19 8:14 PM, Andy Smith wrote: I do understand that re-adding an empty jessie-updates directory will silence a lot of warnings from apt update, and thus would avoid the questions from end users that I have seen in a lot of places, but… I can't help thinking that although it is bad that the

Re: jessie-updates gone

On 4/1/19 3:50 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: We have asked if it's going to be re-added, even if empty, to avoid people using jessie from seeing errors when updateing package lists. do I have to fill a bugreport to get it back? Yes, do it please.

Re: A huge thank you!

On 05/31/2018 10:44 PM, Adrian Zaugg wrote: Dear LTS Team Your work is greatly appreciated! I would like to thank you all for your effort. Without the LTS of wheezy it would have been a big pain for me. Thanks a lot for helping that much. Best regards, Adrian. +1 M.S.

Fwd: Bug#843399: Acknowledgement (linux-image-3.2.0-4-486 version 3.2.81-2 freezes)

Forwarded Message Subject: Bug#843399: Acknowledgement (linux-image-3.2.0-4-486 version 3.2.81-2 freezes) Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2016 13:03:04 + From: Debian Bug Tracking System Reply-To: 843...@bugs.debian.org To: Miroslav Skoric Thank you for filing a new Bug report

Re: linux-image-3.2.0-4-486

On 11/13/2016 04:58 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: I'm afraid this hasn't arrived. Maybe reportbug doesn't know how to send mail from your system? There should still be a file in /tmp (name beginning with 'reportbug') that can you copy into an email to sub...@bugs.debian.org. It should have arri

Re: linux-image-3.2.0-4-486

On 11/05/2016 10:37 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: Please use 'reportbug kernel' to open a bug report and attach the file to the report. Done.

Re: linux-image-3.2.0-4-486

On 11/04/2016 09:58 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: You should be able to extract the kernel log messages for the new kernel version like this: { zcat /var/log/messages.{4,3,2}.gz ; cat /var/log/messages{.1,} ; } \ | sed -n '/Debian 3\.2\.82-1/,/Debian 3\.2\.81-2/ { /kernel:/p }' \ > kern

Re: linux-image-3.2.0-4-486

On 11/04/2016 12:22 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: Ten days ago I upgraded one of my older PCs running wheezy from kernel 3.2.81-2 to 3.2.82-1 and soon after I realized that the system started to "freeze" a couple of minutes after booting. Does that happen while you are actively using the system, or

linux-image-3.2.0-4-486

Ten days ago I upgraded one of my older PCs running wheezy from kernel 3.2.81-2 to 3.2.82-1 and soon after I realized that the system started to "freeze" a couple of minutes after booting. In fact nothing else could be done but pressing the reset button. After downgrading the kernel back to 3.2

Re: Supporting armel/armhf in wheezy-lts

mmend? For example, I am particularly interested in non-expensive publishing houses that are willingly to publish books in lesser-used disciplines, such as using Linux as a component of amateur radio networks in various educational environments, ... Best regards, Miroslav Skoric -- tut

Re: Upgrading from Debian 6.0 LTS to 7

On 02/20/2016 01:17 PM, Alexis Grigoriou wrote: or is there more that I need to do since my installation has LTS support? One thing that comes to mind is the "squeeze-lts" entry in /etc/apt/sources.list. Does that need to be removed prior to upgrading or does the upgrade process take care of th

Re: Preparing to announce Squeeze LTS end-of-life

On 02/10/2016 10:17 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: so, are you prepared for valentine's day massacre? Actually not: It is Wheezy (7.9) now, and I predict its valentine's day massacre to approach in few years. Btw, when is the end of life for Wheezy LTS? or have you tried something li

Re: Preparing to announce Squeeze LTS end-of-life

On 02/09/2016 05:04 AM, Bret Busby wrote: End of Life on Valentines Day? So, Valentines Day means death to many lifes? A Valentines Day Massacre? (Someone had to say it...) :) To prevent the 'end of life' I upgraded my old comp to wheezy some time ago, despite being told to throw the ol

Re: The content of /etc/apt/sources.list

On 05/23/2015 03:44 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: See . ... I don't see why it wouldn't still work, though it's likely to run slower again. Maybe time for new hardware? Ben. Thanks Ben. Well I am reluctant to invest in

Re: The content of /etc/apt/sources.list

On 05/23/2015 12:36 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: tried searching for more RAM? there's also some small probability to get better/faster CPU for the same socket, e.g. Pentium 3. I'm afraid xfce won't be very fast on such machine, switching to LXDE _could_ help (not sure tho). However, if

The content of /etc/apt/sources.list

Hi, Probably after some faulty misconfiguration I lost some lines in /etc/apt/sources.list so I am not sure now what is the proper content of it. In fact, I started to use squeeze a couple of years ago by installing the first ten CDs of its release 6.0.1a and by time upgraded to 6.0.10 and at