On 10/9/21 4:04 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Sat, Oct 09, 2021 at 10:33:47AM +0200, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
This would be the ELTS (not LTS) repo at
https://salsa.debian.org/freexian-team/extended-lts/security-tracker/.
See the ELTS README at gitlab.com:freexian-lts/extended-lts
[...]
See
On Sat, Oct 09, 2021 at 10:33:47AM +0200, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> This would be the ELTS (not LTS) repo at
> https://salsa.debian.org/freexian-team/extended-lts/security-tracker/.
>
> See the ELTS README at gitlab.com:freexian-lts/extended-lts
[...]
> See
>
On 9/28/21 12:46 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi Jeremiah,
On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 08:57:04PM -0400, Jeremiah C. Foster wrote:
(Jeremiah, shall I explain how to gather this data?)
so there are three very simple scripts involved, which are attached and which
I used to run every Monday and then
Hi Jeremiah,
On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 08:57:04PM -0400, Jeremiah C. Foster wrote:
> > (Jeremiah, shall I explain how to gather this data?)
so there are three very simple scripts involved, which are attached and which
I used to run every Monday and then I massaged them into one email, where I
On 9/6/21 5:31 AM, Holger Levsen wrote:
hi,
today one package was unclaimed for LTS:
- mupdf (codehelp)
and none for ELTS. Also noone claimed 4 packages or more.
Two DLAs which already have been reserved have not yet been published:
- DLA 2754-1 (04 Sep 2021) (pywps)
- DLA 2717-2 (27 Aug
Holger Levsen wrote:
> Two DLAs which already have been reserved have not yet been published:
[..]
> - DLA 2717-2 (27 Aug 2021) (redis)
Thanks for the reminder. This change has now been committed and will
be available on the website after the next run.
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' :
Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On this past Friday, Raphaël put me in touch with Thorsten Glaser, who
had already prepared openjdk-8 package for jessie and stretch. I
reviewed and sponsored the upload, and the packages were literally in
the process of uploading when I saw this message. I will
On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 10:52:00AM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi Roberto,
>
> On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 06:38:15AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > It was completely my fault. [...]
>
> Mistakes happen, thank you for owning yours!
>
> > The update to dla-needed.txt
> > and ela-needed.txt
Hi Roberto,
On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 06:38:15AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> It was completely my fault. [...]
Mistakes happen, thank you for owning yours!
> The update to dla-needed.txt
> and ela-needed.txt did not even cross my mind.
Mistakes happen. I'm just emphasizing "the
Am Montag, dem 09.08.2021 um 06:38 -0400 schrieb Roberto C. Sánchez:
[...]
>
> It was completely my fault. According to Raphaël and Thorsten, Markus
> was not responding to emails. I assumed that because Raphaël requested
> someone get in touch with Thorsten, that I should simply contact
>
On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 10:32:54AM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 06:20:43AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 08:43:34AM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > > today three packages were unclaimed for LTS:
> > > - openjdk-8 (Emilio)
> > >
> > > and
On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 10:32:54AM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 06:20:43AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 08:43:34AM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > > today three packages were unclaimed for LTS:
> > > - openjdk-8 (Emilio)
> > >
> > > and
On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 06:20:43AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 08:43:34AM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > today three packages were unclaimed for LTS:
> > - openjdk-8 (Emilio)
> >
> > and three for ELTS:
> > - openjdk-8 (Emilio)
> On this past Friday, Raphaël put
On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 08:43:34AM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> hi,
>
> today three packages were unclaimed for LTS:
> - nettle (Emilio)
> - openjdk-8 (Emilio)
> - pillow (codehelp)
>
> and three for ELTS:
> - nettle (Emilio)
> - openjdk-7 (Emilio)
> - openjdk-8 (Emilio)
>
> Utkarsh probably
hi,
if you reclaim packages which were unclaimed after 2 weeks of inactivity,
please update the notes *properly*. Updating the date of a note entry stating
'WIP' is not helpful for anyone wanting to contribute, especially if it's
WIP for two months or similar.
Also if it's WIP for weeks it
On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 09:51:44AM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Ah. I can see forgot to make sure it actually ended up on the website.
> I've merged the commit from my fork of the webwml.git repository and
> it should appear on the website in due course. Thanks for the
> pointers.
thanks for fixing
Hey,
> > The script checks:
> > https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml/-/tree/master/english/lts/security/2021
> > Maybe you forgot to git-push there?
>
> https://www.debian.org/lts/security/ also does not show it.
Ah. I can see forgot to make sure it actually ended up on the website.
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 09:20:45AM +0200, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> The script checks:
> https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml/-/tree/master/english/lts/security/2021
> Maybe you forgot to git-push there?
https://www.debian.org/lts/security/ also does not show it.
--
cheers,
Hi Chris,
The script checks:
https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml/-/tree/master/english/lts/security/2021
Maybe you forgot to git-push there?
- Sylvain
On 14/06/2021 09:08, Chris Lamb wrote:
Hi Holger,
Just three DLAs have been reserved and haven't been published yet:
Thanks
Hi Holger,
> Just three DLAs have been reserved and haven't been published yet:
Thanks for these. However, I think this is a false positive:
> - DLA 2676-1 (05 Jun 2021) (python-django)
This, I believe, has been published:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/06/msg4.html
Hello,
On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 2:23 AM Lynoure Braakman wrote:
> No one claimed more than 4 packages. Utkarsh claimed 4 packages, but
> having mrxvt, rxvt and uxvt-unicode claimed by different people wouldn't
> make very much sense, so no problem there.
Yep, all 4 packages are affected by the
Hi,
On 03/05/2021 16:40, Lynoure Braakman wrote:
Following DLAs have been reserved and haven't been published yet:
DLA 2637-1 (23 Apr 2021) (drupal7)
DLA 2610-1 (29 Mar 2021) (linux-4.19)
As FD, I have added these to the website (the other two were already done).
Cheers,
Emilio
On Monday 26 April 2021 17:39:01 CEST Lynoure Braakman wrote:
> Four DLAs have been reserved and haven't been published yet:
> DLA 2637-1 (23 Apr 2021) (drupal7)
> DLA 2636-1 (23 Apr 2021) (pjproject)
> DLA 2629-1 (18 Apr 2021) (libebml)
> DLA 2628-1 (17 Apr 2021) (python2.7)
> DLA 2618-2
Hello,
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 1:43 AM Holger Levsen wrote:
> well, yes, but it was caught by the script I'm running each week?!?
I am actually not sure what to reply because all I wanted to convey is
that this was left unpublished and no one's at fault here, really.
Someone had to notice and
hi,
dropping the elts list..
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 12:41:27AM +0530, Utkarsh Gupta wrote:
> I am not sure. This is a rare example of how a website update could go
> missing since this update was done entirely by another DD without
> anyone's help or coordination and might've missed the
Hello,
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 12:26 AM Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 12:04:44AM +0530, Utkarsh Gupta wrote:
> > > Twos DLAs have been reserved and haven't been published yet:
> > > - DLA 2613-1 (31 Mar 2021) (underscore)
> > This was issued by Yadd (the regular maintainer/team
Hi Utkarsh,
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 12:04:44AM +0530, Utkarsh Gupta wrote:
> > Twos DLAs have been reserved and haven't been published yet:
> > - DLA 2613-1 (31 Mar 2021) (underscore)
> This was issued by Yadd (the regular maintainer/team member of the JS
> team) and hence was missing the website
Hi Holger,
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 5:29 PM Holger Levsen wrote:
> Twos DLAs have been reserved and haven't been published yet:
> - DLA 2613-1 (31 Mar 2021) (underscore)
This was issued by Yadd (the regular maintainer/team member of the JS
team) and hence was missing the website update. I've now
On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 11:32:13AM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
>
> One DLA has been reserved but not yet been published:
> - DLA 2537-1 (31 Jan 2021) (ffmpeg)
>
It looks like this was just merged/published.
> Have a great week!
>
You too!
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 08:08:55AM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> There are two DLAs which have been reserved but not yet been published:
> - DLA 2463-1 (22 Nov 2020) (samba)
> - DLA 2379-3 (21 Nov 2020) (mediawiki)
I've just merged those debian-www MRs so these DLAs should be on the website
any
Abhijith PA writes:
> Also my issue is cleared and jupyter-notebook *accepted* . I hope
> golang-github-ncw-rclone-dev cleared too.
Yes, the two packages of mine that were waiting now got in.
--
Brian May
Hello Brian,
On 17/11/20 2:14 am, Brian May wrote:
> Abhijith PA writes:
>
>> I generated DLA for jupyter-notebook just before upload. But upload was
>> rejected due to `Built-Using refers to non-existing source package`. I have
>> pinged ftp masters couple of times to manually move needed
Abhijith PA writes:
> I generated DLA for jupyter-notebook just before upload. But upload was
> rejected due to `Built-Using refers to non-existing source package`. I have
> pinged ftp masters couple of times to manually move needed packages to
> security-master. If any ftp masters here, please
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 12:36:23PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> These used to include the DLA number. Maybe those could be back?
copy error on my side, sorry.
- DLA 2446-1 (10 Nov 2020) (moin)
- DLA 2432-1 (04 Nov 2020) (jupyter-notebook)
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
Hi,
On 16/11/20 5:06 pm, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Hi,
...
> fwiw the jupyter-notebook DLA is not in -announce either, so it's not just
> missing in the website.
I generated DLA for jupyter-notebook just before upload. But upload was
rejected due to `Built-Using refers to non-existing
Hi,
On 16/11/2020 11:31, Holger Levsen wrote:
There are three DLAs which have been reserved but not yet been published:
- (15 Nov 2020) (libvncserver)
- (10 Nov 2020) (moin)
- (04 Nov 2020) (jupyter-notebook)
These used to include the DLA number. Maybe those could be back?
fwiw the
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 03:41:25PM +0200, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> I consider each separately and I can write a detailed rationale, but I
> feel out-of-place doing so (I'm not the one designing and justifying the
> procedures), and 10 days with no activity feels a bit long to resume
> this kind of
Hi,
On 31/08/2020 14:44, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 12:59:54PM +0200, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
>> Still in this particular case, in our process the team coordinator cites
>> contributors by running a heuristic-based script, and forwarding it
>> verbatim to the team (and the
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 12:59:54PM +0200, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> In this particular case of missing web imports, one real issue is a
> fragile workflow involving duplicate mail/web announcements due to lack
> of automation/integration.
sure, and my remarks are just to help with this sub-optimal
Hi,
On 20/08/2020 19:37, Holger Levsen wrote:
>>> p.s.: as an after thought re: "don't harass me" (though I get it was a
>>> joke, but I think the joke conveyed a useful notion): maybe my semiautomatic
>>> mails should have a permanent disclaimer that being 'called out' by them is
>>> nothing bad
Hi Sylvain,
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 04:31:28PM +0200, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> I was thinking of 24h, in which case it's perfectly justified to be
> notified.
> Anyway I settled for printing the DLA date.
thanks, I like that the date and package name is printed now. I slightly dislike
not naming
Hi
On 18/08/2020 00:08, Holger Levsen wrote:
> I believe that wouldn't change anything. If the script would only
> complain about DLA reservations X hours old, of course $you would send
> the DLA right after my mail / after X hours + 2 minutes.
I was thinking of 24h, in which case it's perfectly
Hi,
According to
https://wiki.debian.org/LTS/Development#Claim_a_DLA_ID_in_DLA.2Flist
one reserves the DLA number right /after/ the upload, with a dated entry
in data/DLA/list, so it's meant to be used quickly.
That being said, I modified the script to not only s/committer/package/,
but also
Hi
One thing to consider when implementing a delay. You typically reserve the
DLA some time before making the update so the time you select will most
likely be wrong.
Based on this I tend to agree with Holger that any time you select will not
be suitable. :-)
But sure some delay may be ok.
//
hi Sylvain,
On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 11:45:03PM +0200, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> > - DLA 2332-1 (reserved by Sylvain Beucler)
> I just uploaded it, I am waiting for the ftp confirmation mail, I didn't
> even send it by e-mail yet - don't harass me!! ;)
>
> More seriously, we could add a delay.
I
Hi,
On 17/08/2020 23:31, Holger Levsen wrote:
> There are three DLAs which have been reserved but not yet been published on
> www.debian.org:
>
> - DLA 2332-1 (reserved by Sylvain Beucler)
I just uploaded it, I am waiting for the ftp confirmation mail, I didn't
even send it by e-mail yet -
Hi Emilio,
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 11:27 PM Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
wrote:
> On 10/07/2020 19:49, Utkarsh Gupta wrote:
> They got reverted here:
>
> commit 41a5070e43be50edc80c35082caa1a5005b06131
> Author: Branislav Makuch
> Date: Wed Jul 1 13:31:49 2020 +
>
> Revert "Merge branch
On 10/07/2020 19:49, Utkarsh Gupta wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 1:40 PM Holger Levsen wrote:
>> Three DLAs have been reserved but not yet been published on www.debian.org:
>> LTS:
>>
>> - DLA 2269-1 (reserved by Utkarsh Gupta)
>> - DLA 2270-1 (reserved by Utkarsh Gupta)
>> - DLA
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 11:19 PM Utkarsh Gupta wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 1:40 PM Holger Levsen wrote:
> > Three DLAs have been reserved but not yet been published on www.debian.org:
> > LTS:
> >
> > - DLA 2269-1 (reserved by Utkarsh Gupta)
> > - DLA 2270-1 (reserved by Utkarsh Gupta)
> > -
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 1:40 PM Holger Levsen wrote:
> Three DLAs have been reserved but not yet been published on www.debian.org:
> LTS:
>
> - DLA 2269-1 (reserved by Utkarsh Gupta)
> - DLA 2270-1 (reserved by Utkarsh Gupta)
> - DLA 2271-1 (reserved by Utkarsh Gupta)
This is weird. These
On Mo 29 Jun 2020 12:07:31 CEST, Holger Levsen wrote:
- DLA 2230-1 (reserved by Mike Gabriel)
Ouch. Here it is:
https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml/-/merge_requests/504
Mike
--
DAS-NETZWERKTEAM
c\o Technik- und Ökologiezentrum Eckernförde
Mike Gabriel, Marienthaler Str. 17,
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 5:58 PM 'Mike Gabriel' via Extended LTS
Contributors wrote:
> > - DLA 2230-1 (reserved by Mike Gabriel)
> Ouch. Here it is:
> https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml/-/merge_requests/504
Merged! :)
Best,
Utkarsh
Hi Emilio,
> > If we do not announce these via the website, I suppose the next course
> > of action would be to update the script to ignore these. Advice welcome.
>
> parse-dla.pl will dtrt, e.g.:
>
> emilio@andromeda:~/deb/webwml/english/lts/security$ ls 2020/*-2.*
Ah, I had looked for
On 09/03/2020 19:29, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Hi Holger et al.,
>
>> ERROR: .data or .wml file missing for DLA 2115-2 (reserved by Chris Lamb)
>__^__
>
> How does we announce a regression (ie. -2, -3) via the website? The
> namespacing used here
Hi Holger et al.,
> ERROR: .data or .wml file missing for DLA 2115-2 (reserved by Chris Lamb)
__^__
How does we announce a regression (ie. -2, -3) via the website? The
namespacing used here (captured in the filenames such as 2020/
dla-2115.wml etc.)
Hi Emilio,
On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 12:57:26PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> And it's finally merged into webwml. You can run it like this:
yay! thank you very much for resolving this issue finally!
& more thanks for cleaning up the remaining entries!
--
cheers,
Holger
On 02/03/2020 12:57, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 01/03/2020 00:28, Holger Levsen wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 10:46:48PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
I have moved it to the security-tracker in [1].
>>> hah.
>>
>> hah and now that I want to use it I realize you moved the MR
On 01/03/2020 00:28, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 10:46:48PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
>>> I have moved it to the security-tracker in [1].
>> hah.
>
> hah and now that I want to use it I realize you moved the MR only... grrr.
> ok, we'll see how this goes.
And it's finally
On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 10:46:48PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > I have moved it to the security-tracker in [1].
> hah.
hah and now that I want to use it I realize you moved the MR only... grrr.
ok, we'll see how this goes.
;)
--
cheers,
Holger
Hi Emilio,
On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 02:02:41PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 19/02/2020 10:45, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > btw I wonder if that script shouldn't leave elsewhere, such as in the webwml
> > repo or in the security-tracker.
> I have moved it to the security-tracker
On 19/02/2020 10:45, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> btw I wonder if that script shouldn't leave elsewhere, such as in the webwml
> repo or in the security-tracker.
I have moved it to the security-tracker in [1]. I made it more useful for DSAs
by ignoring regression updates, as those are not
Hi all,
> And, thanks to Emilio's patch showing the authors here, we got significantly
> less DLAs missing on www.debian.org:
[..]
> ERROR: .data or .wml file missing for DLA 1985-1 (reserved by Chris Lamb)
Thanks for your dilegence. Another one with a local commit but I
neglected to ensure an
On Mon, 2020-02-24 at 14:17 +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> hi,
>
> today I unclaimed
>
> for LTS:
> - python-pysaml2 (Abhijith PA)
>
> and none for eLTS.
>
>
> And, thanks to Emilio's patch showing the authors here, we got significantly
> less DLAs missing on www.debian.org:
>
> ERROR: .data
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 11:14:35AM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Do you have python3-git installed? I made that dependency optional, so that if
> you don't have it, the script will still work (but without the author info).
thanks, this fixed this indeed.
--
cheers,
Holger
Dear all.
> > The attached patch allows that script to also print author information when
> > using a local copy of the security-tracker repo with the --list option.
This is extremely useful, thank you.
> > ERROR: .data or .wml file missing for DLA 2083-1 (reserved by Chris Lamb)
Looking at my
Hi Emilio,
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 10:45:36AM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > cd ~/Projects/security-tracker
> > git pull
> > cd ~/Projects/debian-www/webwml
> > git pull
> > ../cron/parts/10-check-advisories --mode DLA 2>&1
> >
> > where
On 20/02/2020 14:32, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> I still see this in 2019/dla-1993.wml:
>
> # do not modify the following line
> #include "$(ENGLISHDIR)/lts/security/2020/dla-1993.data"
> # $Id: $
>
> Looks like you actually need to modify it :p
>
> Btw if you parse a file with a Date:
On 20/02/2020 13:56, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 20/02/2020 13:35, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 20/02/2020 12:40, Abhijith PA wrote:
>>> Holger,
>>>
>>> On 19/02/20 3:15 pm, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>>
>>>
The attached patch allows that script to also print author
Hi,
On 20/02/2020 13:35, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 20/02/2020 12:40, Abhijith PA wrote:
>> Holger,
>>
>> On 19/02/20 3:15 pm, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>
>>
>>> The attached patch allows that script to also print author information when
>>> using a local copy of the security-tracker
On 20/02/2020 12:40, Abhijith PA wrote:
> Holger,
>
> On 19/02/20 3:15 pm, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>
>
>> The attached patch allows that script to also print author information when
>> using a local copy of the security-tracker repo with the --list option.
>> Otherwise it should fall back
Holger,
On 19/02/20 3:15 pm, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> The attached patch allows that script to also print author information when
> using a local copy of the security-tracker repo with the --list option.
> Otherwise it should fall back to the status quo. The current output is:
>
>
Hi,
On 19/02/2020 10:45, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 13/02/2020 14:02, Holger Levsen wrote:
>> Hi Emilio,
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 04:18:08PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> ERROR: .data or .wml file missing for DLA 2098-1
> It would be useful if this info came with
On 13/02/2020 14:02, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi Emilio,
>
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 04:18:08PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> ERROR: .data or .wml file missing for DLA 2098-1
It would be useful if this info came with the person who reserved that DLA.
>> Is this script living
Hi Emilio,
On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 04:18:08PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> >>> ERROR: .data or .wml file missing for DLA 2098-1
> >> It would be useful if this info came with the person who reserved that DLA.
> Is this script living somewhere? I could take a look at extracting that
>
On 10/02/2020 12:07, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 11:23:08AM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> [...]
>>> ERROR: .data or .wml file missing for DLA 2098-1
>> It would be useful if this info came with the person who reserved that DLA.
>
> sure. it's just not that easy to get
On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 11:23:08AM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
[...]
> > ERROR: .data or .wml file missing for DLA 2098-1
> It would be useful if this info came with the person who reserved that DLA.
sure. it's just not that easy to get that information programmatically...
> If
> one of
On 10/02/2020 03:25, Holger Levsen wrote:
> hi,
>
> today I unclaimed
>
> for LTS:
>
> - xerces-c (Hugo Lefeuvre)
>
> and none for eLTS.
>
> Then, the monthly reports for January are due today. Please publish yours, if
> you haven't already.
>
>
> And, the following DLAs are missing on
77 matches
Mail list logo
