Hi folks,
2016-04-25 9:43 GMT+02:00 Santiago Ruano Rincón :
> From the other side, what about armel/armhf LTS support? No objecting
> voices?
>
I enjoy my debian wheezy on my iop32x, which wheezy is the last supported
release for my arch, so +1 for consider LTS support on my n2100.
thanks, reg
Hi,
(fwiw, I am dropping all CCs except debian-lts)
On 23/04/2016 14:41, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Concerning the other concerns that you brought up, they do not seem
> specific to the support of the armel/armhf architectures. They
> rather question the LTS project as a whole and the usage of mone
On Mon, 25 Apr 2016, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> On 2016-04-25 09:27:34, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > - I don't think that the bounty model gives the correct incentive for
> > the security work, and you would have a hard time covering the hard
> > packages...
>
> I think this is a critical part of
On 2016-04-25 09:27:34, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> - I don't think that the bounty model gives the correct incentive for
> the security work, and you would have a hard time covering the hard
> packages...
I think this is a critical part of it. Bounties are fine and fun if you
want to scratch an
Hi,
this is really getting off-topic from the initial discussion, so I'm
dropping all lists except LTS and I add the leader in the loop (he was
already following it but through debian-wb-team AFAIK).
On Mon, 25 Apr 2016, Luca Filipozzi wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 09:55:10AM +0200, Raphael He
On Mon, 2016-04-25 at 02:07 +, Luca Filipozzi wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 09:55:10AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> >
> > Do you have some concrete suggestions?
> Decrease the separation by moving the funds management into Debian proper (via
> a TO like SPI) and move to a bounty model fo
Hi,
just nitpicking about a single detail here…
On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 09:55:10AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> The reason why I did it within Freexian is that it was just the simplest
> way to get it started and to prove that given some sane rules it's
> possible to not harm the Debian commun
El 25/04/16 a las 02:07, Luca Filipozzi escribió:
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 09:55:10AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > Do you have some concrete suggestions?
>
> Decrease the separation by moving the funds management into Debian proper (via
> a TO like SPI) and move to a bounty model for working
On Monday, April 25, 2016 02:07:01 AM Luca Filipozzi wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 09:55:10AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > Do you have some concrete suggestions?
>
> Decrease the separation by moving the funds management into Debian proper
> (via a TO like SPI) and move to a bounty model f
On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 09:55:10AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Do you have some concrete suggestions?
Decrease the separation by moving the funds management into Debian proper (via
a TO like SPI) and move to a bounty model for working on LTS. Make sure we're
transparent with our language rega
On Sun, 2016-04-24 at 22:24 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 09:45 +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
> >
> > Am 18.04.2016 um 08:45 schrieb Guido Günther:
> > [...]
> > >
> > >
> > > I'm all for it (although it's easy to say for me since the most burden
> > > will probably be on t
On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 09:45 +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Am 18.04.2016 um 08:45 schrieb Guido Günther:
> [...]
> >
> > I'm all for it (although it's easy to say for me since the most burden
> > will probably be on the kernel team) and having it as experimental with
> > a single sponsor seems se
On Sun, 24 Apr 2016, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > Consequently, I find the use of Debian resources such as the advertising
> > above
> > and/or the use of Debian machines as being problematic.
>
> It is really worse that indicating that some Debian services are handled
> by a given (commercial) CD
On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 09:55:10AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > https://wiki.debian.org/LTS/ makes it appear that LTS is an official Debian
> > effort.
>
> And it is. There are multiple Debian developers who have initiated this
> project, have been organizing it on debian-lts@lists.debian.org
On 04/24/2016 09:55 AM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
As a Debian developer (and not only as a freelancer/company owner) I do
care about Debian LTS because it is important for Debian's long term
relevance (at least according to me).
An off-topic: As a Debian user (not a developer/programmer, at lea
Hi,
thanks for the feedback.
On Sat, 23 Apr 2016, Julien Cristau wrote:
> I think one of the contentious points is how "Freexian raising funds to
> work on Debian LTS" is already too close to calling itself "Debian LTS
> fundraising", so I'm not sure bringing them closer would alleviate
> anyone'
On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 02:41:30PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> That's why I have been advocating for a change of the DMUP. It has been used
> far too often to annoy persons who are being paid (or who are accepting
> donations) to work on Debian instead of causing real troubles that could
> anno
On 23/04/16 13:41, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 22 Apr 2016, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
I am not speaking on behalf of DSA here.
Thanks for making this clear. I also want to explain why I included DSA
in the discussion: I wanted to make sure that the fact that we run wheezy
armel/a
On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 14:41:30 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> I have also been looking at ways to bring the "LTS funding" closer to Debian
> and to find a way to join all this in the Debian Partner program but we
> don't have many volunteers interested in this work. We discussed it a bit
> last
Hi,
On Fri, 22 Apr 2016, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> I am not speaking on behalf of DSA here.
Thanks for making this clear. I also want to explain why I included DSA
in the discussion: I wanted to make sure that the fact that we run wheezy
armel/armhf buildd for two more years do not go against some
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 05:16:19PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > The LTS period is about to start soon and we will send out an announce
> > soon... it would be nice to be able to say a word about armel/armhf, so
> > an official confirmation from ftpmasters/DSA would be nice.
>
> So, I'm a bit
]] Raphael Hertzog
I am not speaking on behalf of DSA here.
> The LTS period is about to start soon and we will send out an announce
> soon... it would be nice to be able to say a word about armel/armhf, so
> an official confirmation from ftpmasters/DSA would be nice.
So, I'm a bit divided on a
On Mon, 18 Apr 2016, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> In the mean time, the sponsor clarified that they will join as "gold
> sponsor" so they are effectively sponsoring 8 hours of work per month,
> which seems to be enough to cover for the increased work that those
> ports might represent.
The sponsorship
Hey guys,
Might be a longshot, but you could contact the Scaleway team (scaleway.com).
They provide physical arm servers with (among others) Wheezy images, as
well as Jessie and Sid images.
I couldn't find a direct contact email, but they do have a ticketing system
on their website. (or maybe som
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 09:44:43AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 18 Apr 2016, Guido Günther wrote:
> > I assume the level of sponsorship offered is reasonable to support an
> > arm port?
>
> Yes, I believe so. They will join as gold sponsor.
>
> > I still wonder how we could wo
Am 18.04.2016 um 08:45 schrieb Guido Günther:
[...]
> I'm all for it (although it's easy to say for me since the most burden
> will probably be on the kernel team) and having it as experimental with
> a single sponsor seems sensible.
+1 from my side too. I guess I'm one of those armel hobbyists an
Hi,
On Mon, 18 Apr 2016, Guido Günther wrote:
> I assume the level of sponsorship offered is reasonable to support an
> arm port?
Yes, I believe so. They will join as gold sponsor.
> I still wonder how we could would make it simpler to have this
> support end up at the right places (i.e. LTS get
Hello,
On Fri, 15 Apr 2016, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> armhf users to run jessie and armel users to be only hobbyists). But here
> we have a sponsor willing to sign on a contract saying us « our customers wish
> to use Debian 7 OS continuously so that we are planning to sponsor the LTS
> efforts for
(trimming the cc list a bit since this is mostly a +1)
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 10:03:45AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I know that we decided to not support arm* for wheezy-lts during last
> Debconf but it turns out that Freexian has been contacted by a potential LTS
> sponsor selli
Hello,
I know that we decided to not support arm* for wheezy-lts during last
Debconf but it turns out that Freexian has been contacted by a potential LTS
sponsor selling arm* products:
Openblocks A7 (armel)
http://openblocks.plathome.co.jp/products/obs_a/a7/spec.html
Opneblocks AX3 (armhf)
http:/
30 matches
Mail list logo
