Am Montag, den 31.03.2008, 08:10 +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> I recently learned that file has obviosely no means for detecting biological
> data formats. Three months ago we had some discussions about Applied
> Biosystems chromatograms[1]. This thread more or less had ended with: We
> are wai
On Mon, 31 Mar 2008, Daniel Leidert wrote:
As long as there is no agreement with upstream, you can use the
a) x- prefix approach
b) vnd. vendor approach
Both are described in the MIME specification (IIRC i mentioned the RFC
in the discussion). I would suggest the latter for the application/* t
Am Montag, den 31.03.2008, 15:56 +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> On Mon, 31 Mar 2008, Daniel Leidert wrote:
>
> > As long as there is no agreement with upstream, you can use the
> >
> > a) x- prefix approach
> > b) vnd. vendor approach
> >
> > Both are described in the MIME specification (IIRC i me
Le Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 08:10:12AM +0200, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> Now I wonder whether we could assemble general mime information for
> several biological data formats to enable applications to detect whether
> files have the format they should have. I think this would be of great
> profit for
On Mon, 31 Mar 2008, Charles Plessy wrote:
Indeed, my initial approach of having the definition in the packages
using them is not sustainable.
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMedMIME
Although I was initially thinking that it would be better to to this for
Lenny+1,
I do not see a reason why we s
Are applications for the SoC biological database manager project are still
open? I know it's last-minute, but I thought it can't hurt to ask. Please
let me know if it is possible to still apply, and what I would need to do
so.
In 2006, I got an NSERC (Canada's big science funding body) award to do
Oh, I forgot to mention that Debian is the best distro, and Vi is the best
editor. Hopefully that last one doesn't get me disqualified...
-Aidan
On 31/03/2008, Aidan Findlater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Are applications for the SoC biological database manager project are still
> open? I know
This is what I mean
http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=testing&package=gnumed-client
It is not available for arm architecture , is it ?
Take file for example from here http://packages.debian.org/lenny/file
It shows more architectures including arm.
So I believe there is no repository I coul
http://packages.debian.org/lenny/gnumed-client
it lists a recommended package libchipcard3-tools which supposedly does not
exist. Is this an error ?
Thanks
--
Sebastian Hilbert
Leipzig / Germany
[www.gnumed.de] -> PGP welcome, HTML ->/dev/null
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Teemu Ikonen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Two-way syncing between SVN and most other distributed VCS is possible
> (I've tried it with bzr and git). The problem here is not really
> subversion, but svn-buildpackage, which encourages storing only the
> debian dir. I suppose it would be theoretic
On Mon, 31 Mar 2008, Sebastian Hilbert wrote:
http://packages.debian.org/lenny/gnumed-client
it lists a recommended package libchipcard3-tools which supposedly does not
exist. Is this an error ?
It would be an error if it would be correct what you wrote. But it is not
"Recommended" but "Sugg
On Mon, 31 Mar 2008, Sebastian Hilbert wrote:
This is what I mean
http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=testing&package=gnumed-client
Ahh, OK, that explains the situation.
It is not available for arm architecture , is it ?
Take file for example from here http://packages.debian.org/len
On Mon, 31 Mar 2008, Aidan Findlater wrote:
Oh, I forgot to mention that Debian is the best distro, and Vi is the best
editor. Hopefully that last one doesn't get me disqualified...
Well, the first statement increases your chances, but the second pushes
you out! ;-) Wait, last chance: What is
Le Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 10:45:55PM +0200, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> On Mon, 31 Mar 2008, Aidan Findlater wrote:
>
> >Oh, I forgot to mention that Debian is the best distro, and Vi is the best
> >editor. Hopefully that last one doesn't get me disqualified...
>
> Well, the first statement increases
14 matches
Mail list logo
