Re: Source code of phyutility

2012-02-15 Thread Stephen Smith
Hi Andreas, Derby requirement should be gone. Hope that helps and let me know if you run into any other issues. Take care, Stephen On 01/31/2012 10:21 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: Hi Stephen, On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 09:52:32AM -0500, Stephen Smith wrote: No problems. How about I just change it f

Re: [MoM]: r9659 - trunk/packages/fis-gtm/fis-gtm/trunk/debian

2012-02-15 Thread Karsten Hilbert
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 09:45:51PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > As far as I understood the resulting C files only work for a specific > version and not for an upgrade. Regardless of whether that is actually the case - you are right, this is quite possible. Even if it would simply be that later M

Re: [MoM]: r9659 - trunk/packages/fis-gtm/fis-gtm/trunk/debian

2012-02-15 Thread Andreas Tille
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 04:29:16PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > > The problem is that *my* fis-gtm_5.4-002B.orig.tar.gz tarball does not > contain the file fis-gtm-src-extras/pro/gtminstall. Should I recreate > the orig.tar.gz??? I recreated the tarball now and can confirm that this file is jus

Re: [MoM]: r9659 - trunk/packages/fis-gtm/fis-gtm/trunk/debian

2012-02-15 Thread Andreas Tille
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 06:43:59PM +0100, Karsten Hilbert wrote: > > > I believe Andreas was using "initial" as in "version 0.1" > > of the packaging, e.g. the first quick and dirty way of > > getting it done, and then revising it to follow better > > practices and cleaner methods to become a "ver

Re: [MoM]: r9659 - trunk/packages/fis-gtm/fis-gtm/trunk/debian

2012-02-15 Thread Karsten Hilbert
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 12:35:35PM -0500, Luis Ibanez wrote: > >> As a last resort for the *initial* packaging it might work out.  Once we > >> are doing the real packaging we should not try such dirty tricks. > > > > Now that we can generate a mumps compiler by way of > > compiling only C code I

Re: [MoM]: r9659 - trunk/packages/fis-gtm/fis-gtm/trunk/debian

2012-02-15 Thread Luis Ibanez
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Karsten Hilbert wrote: > On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 04:29:16PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > >> As a last resort for the *initial* packaging it might work out.  Once we >> are doing the real packaging we should not try such dirty tricks. > > Now that we can generate

Re: [MoM]: r9659 - trunk/packages/fis-gtm/fis-gtm/trunk/debian

2012-02-15 Thread Karsten Hilbert
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 04:29:16PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > As a last resort for the *initial* packaging it might work out. Once we > are doing the real packaging we should not try such dirty tricks. Now that we can generate a mumps compiler by way of compiling only C code I wonder whether

Re: [MoM]: r9659 - trunk/packages/fis-gtm/fis-gtm/trunk/debian

2012-02-15 Thread Andreas Tille
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:03:35AM -0500, Luis Ibanez wrote: > > More on this, > > I just reran "debuild" (still using the -I- option), > to attempt to replicate the installation stage. > > In my case, it find "./pro/gtminstall", just fine, > but it has trouble finding the "configure" file. > >

Re: [MoM]: r9659 - trunk/packages/fis-gtm/fis-gtm/trunk/debian

2012-02-15 Thread Andreas Tille
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 09:43:44AM -0500, Luis Ibanez wrote: > Did you get this message as a result > of running "debuild" ? Actually pdebuild (because this ensures english error messages as a side effect). > I was working on the assumption that debuild goes > through a sequence of > > * config

Re: [MoM]: r9659 - trunk/packages/fis-gtm/fis-gtm/trunk/debian

2012-02-15 Thread Luis Ibanez
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Luis Ibanez wrote: > On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 9:28 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: >> Hi Luis, >> >> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 08:20:14AM -0500, Luis Ibanez wrote: >>> Using the ./pro/gtminstall script was almost too easy    :-) >>> >>> Here is how the rules file looks like

Re: [MoM]: r9659 - trunk/packages/fis-gtm/fis-gtm/trunk/debian

2012-02-15 Thread Luis Ibanez
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 9:28 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Luis, > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 08:20:14AM -0500, Luis Ibanez wrote: >> Using the ./pro/gtminstall script was almost too easy    :-) >> >> Here is how the rules file looks like now: >> >> >> override_dh_auto_install: >>       ./pro/gtmin

Re: [MoM]: r9659 - trunk/packages/fis-gtm/fis-gtm/trunk/debian

2012-02-15 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Luis, On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 08:20:14AM -0500, Luis Ibanez wrote: > Using the ./pro/gtminstall script was almost too easy:-) > > Here is how the rules file looks like now: > > > override_dh_auto_install: > ./pro/gtminstall --utf8 default --installdir $(CURDIR)/debian/tmp Hmmm:

Re: [MoM]: r9659 - trunk/packages/fis-gtm/fis-gtm/trunk/debian

2012-02-15 Thread Luis Ibanez
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 5:38 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 04:45:04PM -0500, Bhaskar, K.S wrote: >> >> If gtm_version is set, it does not download anything.  So, for >> installing a GT.M binary that is built from source, Luis can simply >> use the gtminstall script. > > Ahh, O

Bug#659964: ITP: proftmb -- per-residue prediction of bacterial transmembrane beta barrels

2012-02-15 Thread Andreas Tille
Just for those who might not read debian-devel. Laszlo, many thanks for including it straight into the tasks file which saves me some work! (I sometimes wished others would follow your example.) Kind regards Andreas. - Forwarded message from Laszlo Kajan - Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012