Re: Proposal for Registry-display on task pages

2017-10-20 Thread Dylan Aïssi
Hi Andreas, 2017-10-19 12:40 GMT+02:00 Andreas Tille : > > Well, it might be that we have some typos in our data but this > duckduckgo.com detour seems very suspicious to me and I would love to > avoid this. > The solution will come from OMICtools, they will provide an API that will permit to dir

Any volunteer for Sprint organisation (Was: Proposal for Registry-display on task pages)

2017-10-20 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi folks, up to now nobody volunteered for Sprint organisation. I think we should be quick to make up our minds to organise traveling. So, is there any volunteer? Kind regards Andreas. On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 09:34:31AM +0200, Dylan Aïssi wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > 2017-10-19 12:40 G

Re: Proposal for Registry-display on task pages

2017-10-20 Thread Andreas Tille
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 12:26:44PM +0200, Dylan Aïssi wrote: > > > > https://duckduckgo.com/?q=\OMIC_6 > > > > should lead to something related to abyss but it does not. :-( > > > > It's normal, the OMICtools ID here is incorrect, the correct ID is > OMICS_6 with a "S". We started to c

Re: [Outreachy] Hi all!

2017-10-20 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Katerina, On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 07:05:39PM +0300, ka lou wrote: > I am sorry for the late answer! This is just an update on my last tries to > get the source of tophat and run a test with sbuild ;) Good you hit the list with your question. > As Diane suggested in the last email , i downlo

Re: Please check implementation

2017-10-20 Thread Matus Kalas
Hey, This is super awesome to see Andreas & Steffen, you really made my day! A few notes: * Would you please add a dot to Bio.Tools? Or Bio.tools, whichever you like more. * The coloured backgrounds don't work in Firefox, but that's no problem at all. * I really like the coloured backg

Re: Please check implementation

2017-10-20 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 02:18:13PM +0200, Matus Kalas wrote: > This is super awesome to see Andreas & Steffen, you really made my day! You could make my day in turn to add more of the data we need for the packages not yet tagged. :-P > A few notes: > > * Would you please add a dot to Bio.

Re: Proposal for Registry-display on task pages

2017-10-20 Thread Steffen Möller
On 19.10.17 08:04, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Steffen, > > I'm working on some test implementation Great! > On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 04:10:59PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote: >> registry_prefix={ >> "bio.tools"=>"https://bio.tools/";, >> "RRID" => "http://identifiers.org/rrid/RRID:";, >> "SciCru

Re: Proposal for Registry-display on task pages

2017-10-20 Thread Steffen Möller
On 19.10.17 08:32, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 08:29:15AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 04:10:59PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote: >>> "OMICtools" => "https://duckduckgo.com/?q=\\"; (a single backslash at the >>> end is what I want) >> The link >> >>

Re: Any volunteer for Sprint organisation (Was: Proposal for Registry-display on task pages)

2017-10-20 Thread Steffen Möller
I am in a skype meeting at the very moment .. did not reach our contact over there, yet. Let us find another place if I fail to establish a contact till Monday. Cheers, Steffen On 20.10.17 09:56, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi folks, > > up to now nobody volunteered for Sprint organisation. I think

Re: Role of acedb-other-belvu and acedb-other-dotter versus belvu & dotter from seqtools

2017-10-20 Thread Steffen Möller
Hi Andreas, On 19.10.17 18:09, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > I started to check the list of external packages of possibly interesting > packages and stumbled upon blixem which is part of seqtools[1]. The > source also contains dotter and belvu and seems to be actively > maintained. However, the

Re: Role of acedb-other-belvu and acedb-other-dotter versus belvu & dotter from seqtools

2017-10-20 Thread Andreas Tille
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 04:23:37PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote: > > I started to check the list of external packages of possibly interesting > > packages and stumbled upon blixem which is part of seqtools[1]. The > > source also contains dotter and belvu and seems to be actively > > maintained. H

Re: Role of acedb-other-belvu and acedb-other-dotter versus belvu & dotter from seqtools

2017-10-20 Thread Steffen Möller
On 20.10.17 17:10, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 04:23:37PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote: >>> I started to check the list of external packages of possibly interesting >>> packages and stumbled upon blixem which is part of seqtools[1]. The >>> source also contains dotter and belvu

What's next. Re: Please check implementation

2017-10-20 Thread Steffen Möller
On 20.10.17 15:12, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 02:18:13PM +0200, Matus Kalas wrote: >> This is super awesome to see Andreas & Steffen, you really made my day! > You could make my day in turn to add more of the data we need for the > packages not yet tagged. :-P @Matúš,

Re: RFS: bowtie/1.2.1.1+dfsg-1

2017-10-20 Thread Dominique Belhachemi
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Alex Mestiashvili < ames...@rsh2.donotuse.de> wrote: > Hello, > > I've worked a bit on bowtie in git [0] and think that it is ready for > upload. It also presumably closes #864439. One of the issues I run > during package building is that bowtie unit tests fail on

Re: What's next. Re: Please check implementation

2017-10-20 Thread Andreas Tille
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 06:13:10PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote: > > You could make my day in turn to add more of the data we need for the > > packages not yet tagged. :-P > > @Matúš, you may rest assured that any task entry that has any registry > reference also had bio.tools checked. I don't min

Re: What's next. Re: Please check implementation

2017-10-20 Thread Steffen Möller
On 20.10.17 21:03, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 06:13:10PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote: > > . * RRID|SciCrunch: identifiers.org don't guarantee anything. If there's no cool permanent URL, identifiers.org don't have it either. That's exactly the case her

Should we package BioConductor TFBSTools? [Was [libtfbs-perl] 04/08: Add upstream's notice of deprecation to the package's description.]

2017-10-20 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, when reading this commit log: Should we package Bioconductor TFBSTools? This would need at least a hand full of Bioconductor depencencies but usually it is quite straightforward and can be easily done via dh-make-R --team med --test run-unit-test plus editing d/copyright a bit. If my