Étienne Mollier wrote:
> Technically speaking, the existing bedtools-test package moving
> to Arch: any will need one instance per architecture, so growing
> the size of the archive.
That is true, and the test data is unfortunately quite large. One could put the
htsutil executable (and perhaps th
Hi John,
John Marshall, on 2021-01-17 16:35:36 +:
> Étienne Mollier wrote:
> > I noticed current bedtools 2.29.2+dfsg-5 fails to migrate to
> > testing, so I pushed a fix[1].
>
> The problem being that the bedtools-test package's symlink to
> the htsutil executable located in the bedtools pac
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 01:27:08PM -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> > You could join our Debian Med sprint and than we talk about this.
>
> added Feb 18-21 to my calendar...
:-)
> I will try to keep an eye on the
> perspective schedule to see when container relevant discussion would
> happen t
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 11:51:32PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> dcut dm --uid npatra...@gmail.com --allow cdbfasta
Done. Thanks!
tony
On Mon, 18 Jan 2021, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Yaroslav,
> thanks a lot for the valuable information.
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 09:15:16AM -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> > May be would be of some help/information
> You could join our Debian Med sprint and than we talk about this.
added Feb
gbp clone --pristine-tar https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/cdbfasta
OR
dcut dm --uid npatra...@gmail.com --allow cdbfasta
Thanks and Regards
Nilesh
Hi,
thanks to a hint of Juhani here I striped llvm from the upstream source
and tried again (please git pull if you just have a clone of the spades
Git repository). Unfortunately also here the build does not succeed:
...
[ 69%] Building CXX object
common/pipeline/CMakeFiles/pipeline.dir/library
Hi Yaroslav,
thanks a lot for the valuable information.
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 09:15:16AM -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> May be would be of some help/information
You could join our Debian Med sprint and than we talk about this.
See you
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
On Mon, 18 Jan 2021, Alex Mestiashvili wrote:
> But we have a great success with singularity definition files.
Forgot also to mention a project, which is despite "neuro" in its name,
is not that much "neuro":
https://github.com/ReproNim/neurodocker/
Neurodocker is a command-line progra
Hi Steffen,
On 1/17/21 4:42 PM, Steffen Möller wrote:
Hello,
Our HPC environment does not offer Docker, but Singularity
(https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0177459)
is supported. I thought I should give it a shot. Is anybody using this
already on this list?
Best,
On Sun, 17 Jan 2021, Steffen Möller wrote:
> Hello,
> Our HPC environment does not offer Docker, but Singularity
> (https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0177459)
> is supported. I thought I should give it a shot. Is anybody using this
> already on this list?
FWIW,
On Sun, 2021-01-17 at 16:42 +0100, Steffen Möller wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Our HPC environment does not offer Docker, but Singularity
> (
> https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0177459
> )
> is supported. I thought I should give it a shot. Is anybody using
> this
> already
12 matches
Mail list logo
