Hi,
Instead of sending each bug fix mail to the list, I thought of sending
a consolidated list instead, for the advent BSP, starting Dec 1.
+--+--+---+
| #1058558 | seqkit | RC|
+--+--+---+
| #1046668 | seqkit
Hi Debian Med team,
thank you all for joining the bug squashing party. I think we cleaned
up the list of bugs quite a bit. The last round of freshly filed bugs
was cleaned up quite quickly - thank you for working on this so busily.
I personally became a bit distracted the last couple of days.
Hi,
Instead of sending each bug fix mail to the list, I thought of sending
a consolidated list instead, for the advent BSP, starting Dec 1.
Here are the bugs that I have fixed in debian-med team during this time:
╔═╤╤═══╗
║ Bug │ Package│ Severity ║
╠
12:09, Andreas Tille wrote:
> | this issue is something for our advent calendar. Anybody with cblas
> | knowledge?
>
> I am the GNU GSL maintainer, and I at one point also worked a lot with the
> Atlas and other LAPACK/BLAS packages. I think Mo may be wrong here: I did the
> same app
On 5 December 2020 at 12:09, Andreas Tille wrote:
| this issue is something for our advent calendar. Anybody with cblas
| knowledge?
I am the GNU GSL maintainer, and I at one point also worked a lot with the
Atlas and other LAPACK/BLAS packages. I think Mo may be wrong here: I did the
same
Hi folks,
this issue is something for our advent calendar. Anybody with cblas
knowledge?
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 10:55:25AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> with my last mail I wanted to express: H, to stupid to turn
> this hint in
Control: tags -1 help
Hi,
I upgraded librostlab-blast in Git[1] but the autopkgtest fails with:
autopkgtest [22:31:34]: test installation-test: [---
Compile and run...
In file included from parseblast.cpp:2:
/usr/include/rostlab/blast-parser-driver.h:61:12: error: ‘enum
ro
Hi,
we have also bug #973431 on jellyfish ...
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 05:32:07PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> any idea about this?
>
> Kind regards
>
> Andreas.
>
> - Forwarded message from Andreas Tille -
>
> Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2020
Hi folks,
any idea about this?
Kind regards
Andreas.
- Forwarded message from Andreas Tille -
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2020 17:06:00 +0100
From: Andreas Tille
To: Debian Bug Tracking System
Subject: Bug#976340: jellyfish: Fails to build on some architectures
X-Debian-PR-Message: repo
Hi,
That is a common problem with legacy code being compiled with gcc-10, since
it defaults to "-fno-common". It can be solved for legacy packages by
passing "CFLAGS=-fcommon" to the `configure` (e.g `./configure
CFLAGS=-fcommon`), then `make` will succeed.
More information from https://gcc.gnu.or
Control: tags -1 help
Hi,
no idea why this was not catched in the usual gcc-10 rebuilds. Any volunteer?
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 12:08:32AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Source: rnahybrid
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS
>
> Hi,
>
> I tried
Hi, Andreas,
على الخميس 1 كانون الأول 2016 01:16، كتب Andreas Tille:
> I'll file a series of "New version available"
> bugs here and will CC the list to enable everybody picking from the
> list. I'll also give comments whether its an easy upgrade (for
> beginners!) or whether its a hard one.
Hi folks,
at about Christmas the window for package upgrades will close and thus
we should not only fix those bugs in existing packages but tackle
important version upgrades as well to deliver the greatest software
collection in Stretch. I'll file a series of "New version available"
bugs here and
for running the calendar and thanks to all who participated
in our Debian Med bug squashing advent calendar! BTW, meanwhile I had
the impression that Mathieu intended to open even more bugs than closing
but for those who might be to shy to open new bugs: Please follow
Mathieu's example and report
Hi everybody,
thanks alot for closing so much bugs. After taking care of 64 bugs in
2011 and 27 bugs in 2012, we reached a new all time high of 73 bugs this
year, BRAVO!
The oldest bug that could be closed was #541207 [1] which was the RFP of
fis-gtm dated from 2009 :-).
Season's Greetings
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 8:27 AM, Emmanuel Promayon
wrote:
> For instance the CamiTK package depends on huge libs such as qt, vtk,
> insighttoolkit and gdcm. When is the best time to try a transition to Qt5,
> Vtk6, itk4 and gdcm2.4?
This is a long debate ;)
Technically this is up to the maintain
something).
>
> What can be done concretely to fix this problem?
>
> If there is anything in my reach, I will try to help (might not be for the
> advent calendar, but maybe for the spring cleaning!).
>
> Another question, may be more addressed to the itk/vtk/gdcm specialists:
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 8:27 AM, Emmanuel Promayon
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
>>> Furthermore I would like to mention another page[3] with lots of
>>> information
>>> about Debian Med packages. Besides the list of RC bugs you can also
>>> see packages that can not be built on a Debian architecture,
>
cm excuses were about the fact gdcm was part of a
transition (itself mentioning mono or something).
What can be done concretely to fix this problem?
If there is anything in my reach, I will try to help (might not be for
the advent calendar, but maybe for the spring cleaning!).
Another questi
Le Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 04:27:13PM +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit :
>
> Yes, that's known and was mentioned by Charles some time ago. However,
> if I understood correctly we need to change something in samtools
> packaging anyway and thus I could live for the moment with the samtools
> copy and mig
Hi Olivier,
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 04:35:37PM +0100, Olivier Sallou wrote:
> If I succeed,
... you will get the free beer in Stonehaven from me. Promised. ;-)
See you
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On 11/26/2013 04:27 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Olivier,
>
> thanks for the review.
>
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 02:58:01PM +0100, Olivier Sallou wrote:
>>> Hardening is another open problem as well as some more lintian warnings.
>>> In addition to the chance
Hi Olivier,
thanks for the review.
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 02:58:01PM +0100, Olivier Sallou wrote:
> > Hardening is another open problem as well as some more lintian warnings.
> > In addition to the chance to show up in the advent calendar I'm offering
> > a free (as in b
ou can also
>> see packages that can not be built on a Debian architecture,
>> packages that are not allowed to migrate from unstable to testing
>> (and thus won't be included in the next release) and packages with a
>> new upstream version. I think those packages need
ith this patch but I have
no idea how to test the functionality. It also should be propagated
upstream.
Hardening is another open problem as well as some more lintian warnings.
In addition to the chance to show up in the advent calendar I'm offering
a free (as in beer) beer for the brave
t the notice of a closed case I will record that in our
Advent calendar[4]. In contrast to normal calendars, let us fill this
special one with lots of good deeds. Maybe we can hide at least one number
of a closed case behind every door.
Good hunting,
Thorsten
PS. The fun starts not until Decembe
Hi Andreas,
On Wed, 28 Dec 2011, Andreas Tille wrote:
Seems we could do with only "one bug of the week" in 2012 to bring it
down to zero. :-)
ok, so let's go :-)
BTW, the calendar does not seem to work any more.
Ooops, sorry, fat finger alert. Now it should work again. I hope it even
surv
Hi Thorsten,
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 01:13:28PM +0100, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> I am really impressed. As I started the Advent Calendar, I expected
> only one closed bug every day. But after 24 days of hard work 63
> bugs are able to pass to the retirement community in the Archive.
So
Hi everybody,
I am really impressed. As I started the Advent Calendar, I expected
only one closed bug every day. But after 24 days of hard work 63 bugs
are able to pass to the retirement community in the Archive.
Unfortunately some new bugs have been detected but still the number of
bugs
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 07:35:16PM +0100, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> hmm, if you look at http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/advent/2011/ the doors
> are always closed as well.
Ahhh, you found another broken advent calendar. :-)
At least if I remember correctly the days of my childhood the doors
re
Hi Andreas,
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011, Andreas Tille wrote:
and after there should be half the doors open I wonder if the open doors
could not show at least the number of bugs closed on this day. A usual
advent calendar changes its look evry day and the doors remain somehow
opened.
hmm, if you
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 10:18:35PM +0100, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
>
> On Tue, 29 Nov 2011, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> >while it is not yet clear to me how the Advent calendar might be filled
> >by I would like to claim the next door (2.12.) for bug #639389.
>
&g
Hi Thorsten,
I keep on watching your Christmas tree at
http://debian-med.alteholz.de/advent/
and after there should be half the doors open I wonder if the open doors
could not show at least the number of bugs closed on this day. A usual
advent calendar changes its look evry day and the
On Sun, 27 Nov 2011, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
Maybe we can hide at least one number of a closed case behind every door.
Wow, I am really impressed. After 8 days of hard work, 19 bugs could be
closed :-). Keep it up!
Thorsten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.o
On Thu, 1 Dec 2011, Andreas Tille wrote:
As the star is part of the image, here is the link to the source:
http://debian-med.alteholz.de/advent-2011-original.tar.gz
which also contains the original original.
403: Forbidden
---> something is wrong with your server.
Urgs, that was a fault
On Thu, 1 Dec 2011, Andreas Tille wrote:
Ahhh, OK. So I will see whether the upload to fix #648705 which I
wanted to claim for 3.12. will count in here because it was a bit
delayed when passing NEW (the package names have changed with this
upload).
The "marked as done"-email already arrived
On Thu, 1 Dec 2011, Andreas Tille wrote:
Sure. While I do not like to turn this into a competition I would love
to loose it in case it would come to such a situation!!!
oh, no, I didn't want to start a competition. I just wanted to encourage
the others to follow your example!
Thorsten
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 10:18:35PM +0100, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> >while it is not yet clear to me how the Advent calendar might be filled
> >by I would like to claim the next door (2.12.) for bug #639389.
>
> Ok, but it should be the Debian Med Advent calendar and not th
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 10:13:41PM +0100, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> >would be the cherry on the cake.
>
> Hmm, I like Black Forest cake :-).
So you prefer cherries inside cake? :-P
> As the star is part of the image, here is the link to the source:
> http://debian-med.alteholz.de/advent-2011-
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 10:17:04PM +0100, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Nov 2011, Andreas Tille wrote:
> >Even if I do not fully understand the calendar procedure
>
> If a bug is closed in december, this is noted behind the door of the
> calendar.
Ahhh, OK. So I will see whether the uplo
On Tue, 29 Nov 2011, Andreas Tille wrote:
while it is not yet clear to me how the Advent calendar might be filled
by I would like to claim the next door (2.12.) for bug #639389.
Ok, but it should be the Debian Med Advent calendar and not the Andreas
Advent Calendar :-)
Thorsten
--
To
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011, Andreas Tille wrote:
Even if I do not fully understand the calendar procedure
If a bug is closed in december, this is noted behind the door of the
calendar. So instead of getting something out, this calendar is filled
with stuff. At Christmas I hope we have a well fille
Hi Charles,
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011, Charles Plessy wrote:
I like to start mornings reading emails like this !
ok, I try my best to repeat that at other times :-).
I do not remember seing such and advent calendar before; I am sure it can
inspire other teams as well.
Out of curiosity, I tried
Hi,
while it is not yet clear to me how the Advent calendar might be filled
by I would like to claim the next door (2.12.) for bug #639389.
Kind regards
Andreas.
- Forwarded message from Debian Bug Tracking System
-
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 19:06:25 +
From: Debian Bug
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 08:55:58AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>
> I like to start mornings reading emails like this !
:-)
> I do not remember seing such and advent calendar before; I am sure it can
> inspire other teams as well.
Definitely. Thorsten is doing really great wor
ent community in the Archive.
> As soon as I get the notice of a closed case I will record that in
> our Advent calendar[2]. In contrast to normal calendars, let us fill
> this special one with lots of good deeds. Maybe we can hide at least
> one number of a closed case behind every d
about 70 cases which are relevant to
Debian Med [1]. So please feel pity for them and allow the transition of
as many as possible poor souls to their final destination, the retirement
community in the Archive.
As soon as I get the notice of a closed case I will record that in our
Advent calendar
47 matches
Mail list logo
