Re: Competing arrow tools in pbgenomicconsensus and unanimity

2018-10-11 Thread Afif Elghraoui
On October 11, 2018 11:14:35 AM EDT, Andreas Tille wrote: >Hi Afif, > >On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 09:27:16AM -0400, Afif Elghraoui wrote: >> > >> >#!/bin/sh >> >variantCaller --algorithm=arrow $* >> > >> >while unanimity installs a compiled binary. @Afif (or whoever is >> >informed about this PB

Re: Competing arrow tools in pbgenomicconsensus and unanimity

2018-10-11 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Afif, On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 09:27:16AM -0400, Afif Elghraoui wrote: > > > >#!/bin/sh > >variantCaller --algorithm=arrow $* > > > >while unanimity installs a compiled binary. @Afif (or whoever is > >informed about this PB programs): Do you have a sensible suggestion > >which arrow we should

Re: Competing arrow tools in pbgenomicconsensus and unanimity

2018-10-11 Thread Afif Elghraoui
Hello, On October 11, 2018 8:06:26 AM EDT, Andreas Tille wrote: >Hi, > >package unanimity[1] now builds and creates the binary package >python-consensuscore2 which in turn is needed to build the latest >version of pbgenomicconsensus[2]. I realised that both packages are >installing a tool

Competing arrow tools in pbgenomicconsensus and unanimity

2018-10-11 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, package unanimity[1] now builds and creates the binary package python-consensuscore2 which in turn is needed to build the latest version of pbgenomicconsensus[2]. I realised that both packages are installing a tool /usr/bin/arrow (shame on upstream for this generic name ;-)). In